Author Topic: Raveonettes live setup?  (Read 4818 times)

MindCage

  • Member
  • Posts: 1282
    • Mindless Faith
Re: Raveonettes live setup?
« Reply #15 on: March 31, 2008, 11:42:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by azaghal1981:
 I was near the middle rows and toward the left and the chattiness was almost unbarable at times.
That's what you get for being on the side with the big bar  ;)   The right side of room didn't have a lot of people and had more people dancing around then having conversations all night.
 
 I did think the open act was a bit unprofessional with their comment about not getting enough time to soundcheck. First off, they're the opening act and second, they had at least a hour...
 
 MindCage
 Mindless Faith
 Deep6 Productions
3MTA3

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21433
  • I don't belong here.
Re: Raveonettes live setup?
« Reply #16 on: March 31, 2008, 01:02:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Tom Servo:
 DC crowds don't so much listen to music...they consider it.
great line.
<sig>

Vas Deferens

  • Member
  • Posts: 8981
(_|_)

xneverwherex

  • Member
  • Posts: 2109
    • Pics and more pics
Re: Raveonettes live setup?
« Reply #18 on: April 01, 2008, 09:55:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by wanderlust j. marshmallow:
  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/30/AR2008033001674.html
do you really go by writers of WaPo to decide what you should see and not see? its quite pathetic.
 
 I know for me -  hearing comments from boardies is either going to make me more or less inclined to see a show vs what some writer thinks about a prior show. At least I know the boardies are _actually_ into music.
 
 and the NYC show was awesome!
HeyLa

Vas Deferens

  • Member
  • Posts: 8981
Re: Raveonettes live setup?
« Reply #19 on: April 02, 2008, 12:02:00 pm »
calm the f*ck down, it's a post-concert review.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by xneverwherex:
   
Quote
Originally posted by wanderlust j. marshmallow:
   http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/30/AR2008033001674.html  
do you really go by writers of WaPo to decide what you should see and not see? its quite pathetic.
 
  [/b]
(_|_)