Author Topic: Stanley Cup Picks  (Read 212227 times)

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21464
  • I don't belong here.
Re: Stanley Cup Picks
« Reply #555 on: June 05, 2009, 10:30:50 am »
i suspect he's hiding in his basement with a rifle, 50 gallons of Evian, and enough hors d'oeuvres to get him through until the start of 2009-2010 season - all a precaution in case the series continues on its most recent trajectory.  
<sig>

Julian, Alleged Computer F**kface

  • Member
  • Posts: 5970
  • JULIAN'S AMERICA - It makes my taco pop!
Re: Stanley Cup Picks
« Reply #556 on: June 05, 2009, 10:40:21 am »
Don't forget my new Tiffany crystal candle holders. I wouldn't go anywhere without them.

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: Stanley Cup Picks
« Reply #557 on: June 05, 2009, 12:27:18 pm »
three BEAUTIFUL goals in less than 6 mins... pens on fire. 

More like three hideous turnovers, but kudos to Pittsburgh for converting those turnovers into goals.
27>34

RatBastard

  • Member
  • Posts: 2955
    • Obscenitees
Re: Stanley Cup Picks
« Reply #558 on: June 06, 2009, 10:48:59 pm »
Did not watch the game but just saw the box score.  Was this a home ref game as much as the box score shows it to be?  Four goals in the 2nd and ALL FOUR are PP (1st one was 5 sec after the man got back so basically a PP goal as well).  Was that the way it really went down or did the Pens just lose control of the game aside from the fact?
FUKIT

babystew

  • Member
  • Posts: 33
Re: Stanley Cup Picks
« Reply #559 on: June 06, 2009, 11:05:43 pm »
Pens completely lost composure.  Took a bunch of really bad penalties.  There was one questionable/bad call (an interference call where both a Pen and Wing ran into Osgood), but otherwise everything was pretty legit.

Julian, Alleged Computer F**kface

  • Member
  • Posts: 5970
  • JULIAN'S AMERICA - It makes my taco pop!
Re: Stanley Cup Picks
« Reply #560 on: June 06, 2009, 11:22:49 pm »
Did not watch the game but just saw the box score.  Was this a home ref game as much as the box score shows it to be?  Four goals in the 2nd and ALL FOUR are PP (1st one was 5 sec after the man got back so basically a PP goal as well).  Was that the way it really went down or did the Pens just lose control of the game aside from the fact?
The Penguins completely lost composure, the Wings looked like they were under zero pressure whatsoever, and Fleury didn't make any save worth replaying. It was one of those games that once it got to 2-0 or 3-0, you knew it was over, and the rest was just the other team completely deconstructing in front of your face.

Julian, Alleged Computer F**kface

  • Member
  • Posts: 5970
  • JULIAN'S AMERICA - It makes my taco pop!
Re: Stanley Cup Picks
« Reply #561 on: June 06, 2009, 11:24:24 pm »
Pens completely lost composure.  Took a bunch of really bad penalties.  There was one questionable/bad call (an interference call where both a Pen and Wing ran into Osgood), but otherwise everything was pretty legit.
Yeah, they seemed to think if they took a cheapy roughing or "physical" penalty that it'd fire their team up or give them a rallying point. and it didn't.

Oh, and also: PAVEL, freaking, DATSYUK. Set up 2 goals and just with his all-around play tipped the collective balance back to the boys from Hockeytown.

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: Stanley Cup Picks
« Reply #562 on: June 08, 2009, 09:11:14 am »
i missed game 5 apart from bits and piece on a 2 inch screen. i'm going to go with "didnt happen"
o/\o

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: Stanley Cup Picks
« Reply #563 on: June 08, 2009, 12:15:08 pm »
i'm going to go with "didnt happen"

Unfortunately in a 7 game series, do overs don't exists.
27>34

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: Stanley Cup Picks
« Reply #564 on: June 08, 2009, 12:21:00 pm »
yes but fortunately the winning team needs 4 wins and not 1 no matter how many goals they win by
o/\o

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: Stanley Cup Picks
« Reply #565 on: June 08, 2009, 12:24:48 pm »
also, theyve got to start and end the season earlier. second year in a row that i've been to a wedding during the scf
o/\o

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: Stanley Cup Picks
« Reply #566 on: June 08, 2009, 12:52:03 pm »
also, theyve got to start and end the season earlier. second year in a row that i've been to a wedding during the scf

I blame the groom - he should know better.  Early to mid August is a good time to get married, but be wary of The PGA.
27>34

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: Stanley Cup Picks
« Reply #567 on: June 08, 2009, 12:57:44 pm »
his comment was it would have been a perfect wedding if the pens would have showed up for the game

o/\o

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: Stanley Cup Picks
« Reply #568 on: June 08, 2009, 08:19:56 pm »
usually i sent around 200 text messages tops

last month it was 737. thanks nhl
o/\o

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: Stanley Cup Picks
« Reply #569 on: June 09, 2009, 12:08:35 pm »
last month it was 737. thanks nhl

Surely, Newcastle had something to do with that as well...
27>34