Author Topic: COVID-19 2020  (Read 401292 times)

grateful

  • Member
  • Posts: 9901
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?
Re: COVID-19 2020
« Reply #3795 on: December 21, 2021, 10:55:23 pm »
U.S. COVID update: Daily cases rising at fastest rate since pandemic began

- New cases: 190,190
- Average: 153,792 (+10,819)
- States reporting: 47/50
- In hospital: 68,290 (+1,099)
- In ICU: 16,477 (+224)
- New deaths: 2,104
- Average: 1,396 (+54)

Data: https://t.co/YDZSbYO7l7

Justin Tonation

  • Member
  • Posts: 5157
  • Did you ever wonder?
😐 🎶

Julian, Forum COGNOSCENTI

  • Member
  • Posts: 28558
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: COVID-19 2020
« Reply #3797 on: December 22, 2021, 11:02:14 am »
^^ See how that overlays with coronavirus surges.
LVMH

Starsky

  • Guest
Re: COVID-19 2020
« Reply #3798 on: December 22, 2021, 01:52:05 pm »
Why wasn’t this done in February

Government incompetence

And it’s an expensive government we pay for…

https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-joe-biden-health-jen-psaki-08ee41d8e7c0af1ad8b4dfb7b434ea61

grateful

  • Member
  • Posts: 9901
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?
Re: COVID-19 2020
« Reply #3799 on: December 22, 2021, 02:14:57 pm »
Why wasn’t this done in February

Government incompetence

And it’s an expensive government we pay for…

https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-joe-biden-health-jen-psaki-08ee41d8e7c0af1ad8b4dfb7b434ea61

Wait. Which is it? The government is too expensive,  or the government should have spent all this money a year ago?

Vas Deferens

  • Member
  • Posts: 8991
Re: COVID-19 2020
« Reply #3800 on: December 22, 2021, 02:24:37 pm »
"The answer goes back to the U.S.'s approach at the start of the pandemic. The U.S. government — under both Trump and Biden — didn't oversee and pay for universal at-home testing the way it did with vaccines."

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/12/10/1062700278/how-the-u-s-got-on-the-slow-track-with-at-home-covid-tests

Why wasn’t this done in February

Government incompetence

And it’s an expensive government we pay for…

https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-joe-biden-health-jen-psaki-08ee41d8e7c0af1ad8b4dfb7b434ea61
(_|_)

Starsky

  • Guest
Re: COVID-19 2020
« Reply #3801 on: December 22, 2021, 04:01:41 pm »
Why wasn’t this done in February

Government incompetence

And it’s an expensive government we pay for…

https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-joe-biden-health-jen-psaki-08ee41d8e7c0af1ad8b4dfb7b434ea61

Wait. Which is it? The government is too expensive,  or the government should have spent all this money a year ago?

It’s both.

grateful

  • Member
  • Posts: 9901
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?
Re: COVID-19 2020
« Reply #3802 on: December 22, 2021, 04:30:18 pm »
Why wasn’t this done in February

Government incompetence

And it’s an expensive government we pay for…

https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-joe-biden-health-jen-psaki-08ee41d8e7c0af1ad8b4dfb7b434ea61

Wait. Which is it? The government is too expensive,  or the government should have spent all this money a year ago?

It’s both.

I feel like you have to choose between large, interventionist government, or small, laissez faire government. You can't really have both (or neither). Otherwise you just look like someone who likes to criticize everything.

Starsky

  • Guest
Re: COVID-19 2020
« Reply #3803 on: December 22, 2021, 04:34:08 pm »
You can have a small government that does the things it’s supposed to do.

I mean giant bailouts for corporations is not something- typically- I think government should do.

Putting out covid test kits 18 months into a pandemic that has killed a million Americans seems like a nobrainer and will save government money.


grateful

  • Member
  • Posts: 9901
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?
Re: COVID-19 2020
« Reply #3804 on: December 22, 2021, 04:37:32 pm »
But why should the government even be providing free test kits at all? Consumers who want them should just go and get them. Making them free won't have a huge impact on whether or not they're used. IF the government mails every household a test kit, nearly 1/3 to 1/2 of them will be wasted. Is that the way small government should work?

Yada

  • Member
  • Posts: 11663
Re: COVID-19 2020
« Reply #3805 on: December 22, 2021, 05:23:02 pm »
Big fan of all the disposable masks and a few hundred million unused tests being thrown in a dump taking 100s of years to decompose.

grateful

  • Member
  • Posts: 9901
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?
Re: COVID-19 2020
« Reply #3806 on: December 22, 2021, 05:49:29 pm »

Starsky

  • Guest
Re: COVID-19 2020
« Reply #3807 on: December 22, 2021, 06:03:54 pm »
Not really opining on whether they should be mailed to people or free.

Beyond my pay grade.


I just don’t think they are widely available enough.

They should at the very least be widely and easily available and inexpensive to encourage their use.

Why? Public health.

I don’t really get your thinking. Me saying government is wasteful doesn’t preclude one from saying government ought to spend money on something.

These kind of arguments remind me of people who come down on Springsteen cause he is rich or people who think you can’t be interested in the environment and take a plane. It’s all about nuance.



« Last Edit: December 22, 2021, 06:07:02 pm by Starsky »

Re: COVID-19 2020
« Reply #3808 on: December 22, 2021, 06:11:03 pm »
hasn't some boardie been beating this 'free and easy' testing since May of 2020
slack

Re: COVID-19 2020
« Reply #3809 on: December 22, 2021, 06:11:35 pm »
The Mountain Goat
https://fb.watch/a3lIKmMyeo/
is he immortal now?  Keeps saying that he's not going to die
slack