Author Topic: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread  (Read 38621 times)

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
« Reply #105 on: November 20, 2009, 08:40:20 pm »
but, the NFL old timers, the ones who punt on 4th and 1 from the opponents 45 yard line, say that's ridiculous. . . .and i'm not buying it.

4th and 1 from the opponents 45 is a completely different argument than 4th and 2 from your own 28 with 2 minutes to go and a 6 point lead.  Nobody young or old in football not named Belicheck has said this was a good idea.  Just a bunch of "stat" heads who you've already admitted are not using a full deck for their equations.

On Sunday you and I have always thought you should go for it on 4th and 1 from the opponents 45, but mostly because punters not named Sepulveda suck.  I'm only sad that we weren't watching the game together so I wouldn't have to listen to your contrarian ways because you find it chic to agree with guys like Easterbrook.  If you were there, you would have called it a bad idea.  And you would have been right.
27>34

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21478
  • I don't belong here.
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
« Reply #106 on: November 20, 2009, 09:16:09 pm »
Bottom line, he ruined his defense's confidence for the rest of the season

bottom line?  hyperbole much?
<sig>

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
« Reply #107 on: November 20, 2009, 09:21:24 pm »
bottom line?  hyperbole much?

OK.  45 is the over under, with the Pats being an 11 point favorite.  (45/2)-(11/2)=17.

I'll take the over on the Jets scoring 17 points.
27>34

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21478
  • I don't belong here.
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
« Reply #108 on: November 20, 2009, 09:28:07 pm »
first, i'd take that bet mostly 'cause it'll give us grounds for smack (!) talk.  name your proposed wager.

second, the link between the jets scoring more than the vegas line gives them credit for is a very very tenuous way of proving that the pat's D is done for the season.
<sig>

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
« Reply #109 on: November 21, 2009, 03:01:55 pm »
only massholes who care more about baseball during the winter think going for it on 4th down was a good idea. and even then only 45% of left handers at night

o/\o

Venerable Bede

  • Member
  • Posts: 3863
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
« Reply #110 on: November 23, 2009, 03:44:08 pm »
first, i'd take that bet mostly 'cause it'll give us grounds for smack (!) talk.  name your proposed wager.

second, the link between the jets scoring more than the vegas line gives them credit for is a very very tenuous way of proving that the pat's D is done for the season.

so, what did sweetcell win?

Pats defense, productive offense beat Jets 31-14
OU812

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21478
  • I don't belong here.
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
« Reply #111 on: November 23, 2009, 04:15:30 pm »
sweetcell won nothing, we never agreed to a wager.  but i'll claim the moral victory, "i told you so" is reward enough.
<sig>

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19716
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
« Reply #112 on: November 23, 2009, 08:47:01 pm »
sweetcell won nothing, we never agreed to a wager.  but i'll claim the moral victory, "i told you so" is reward enough.

And I conceded at halftime via text message.  Sanchez was horrible and all the USC guys I was with said you can forget about him playing in 50 degrees or below weather.  I should have waited for the Drew Brees week to shoot my mouth off.
27>34

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21478
  • I don't belong here.
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
« Reply #113 on: November 23, 2009, 09:26:51 pm »
I should have waited for the Drew Brees week to shoot my mouth off.

except that the saints are averaging over 30 points a game as is.  they'd have to score 50+ points to prove that a defense has serious issues.  somehow i doubt the pats will let brees & co run away with 50+ points (however the pats won't keep pace with the saints).
<sig>

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21478
  • I don't belong here.
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
« Reply #114 on: November 24, 2009, 03:22:30 am »
all the USC guys I was with said you can forget about him playing in 50 degrees or below weather. 

great trait to have when playing in new york, in the AFC (north) East...
<sig>

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: 2009-2010 NFL discussion thread
« Reply #115 on: December 17, 2009, 11:40:32 am »
Vinny Cerrato resigns:

http://www.wtopnews.com/?nid=293&sid=1842940

Now if only Dan Snyder would resign...