930 Forums

=> GENERAL DISCUSSION => Topic started by: sonickteam2 on September 09, 2003, 02:59:00 pm

Title: over the hill?
Post by: sonickteam2 on September 09, 2003, 02:59:00 pm
OK, at the record store last night, we got into a rather interesting conversation, that i think you guys can eat up.
    We were thinking of "rock" bands/musicians that have actually aged well.
    Basically, bands that have put out better records post 40ish than pre 40ish.
   
     I could only think of Tom Petty really.
   Anyone else?   and no , country/folk/blues/jazz...dont count, we are talking ROCK!
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: markie on September 09, 2003, 03:27:00 pm
u2 and REM, and the stones and Paul McCartney......
 
 Oh wait, all of them are shite now.
 
 How about the tyde, they are all old gits and the previous incarnations of bands they were in were not nearly as good. Pretty tenuous though, huh?
 
 Rhett might want to make a case for Nick Lowe. I would make a case for Matt Johnson of THe the. I think Joe Strummers two mescalero albums were brilliant also.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: markie on September 09, 2003, 03:29:00 pm
And I guess David Gedge from the wedding present and now cinerama. I think Torino, his last proper album,  is his best work
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: Guiny on September 09, 2003, 03:30:00 pm
Yeah i'd have to say Joe Strummer aged well.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: sparky on September 09, 2003, 03:32:00 pm
Tom Waits.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer on September 09, 2003, 03:32:00 pm
I thought Tom Petty was a folk artist.
 
    I would make the case for Nick Lowe's last three albums being as good as anything he did earlier in his career.
 
    And Neil Young's output in the 90's was excellent.
 
    Steve Earle's albums since getting out of the clink at 40 have been better than his earlier output, with the exception of his last album.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: jadetree on September 09, 2003, 03:32:00 pm
I think Paul Weller has aged well, not better necessarily, but he has aged well.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: markie on September 09, 2003, 03:35:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by jadetree:
  I think Paul Weller has aged well, not better necessarily, but he has aged well.
I think he looks and sounds good, but the music doesnt contain half the passion to be found on setting sons. Although Stanley Road was pretty great, illumination is just very solid in my opinion.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: jadetree on September 09, 2003, 03:37:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Anton Newcombe:
  I think he looks and sounds good, but the music doesnt contain half the passion to be found on setting sons. Although Stanley Road was pretty great, illumination is just very solid in my opinion.
Listened to Illumination last night, and it is good, especially like the song with Kelly Jones.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: sonickteam2 on September 09, 2003, 03:38:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
  I thought Tom Petty was a folk artist.
 
    I would make the case for Nick Lowe's last three albums being as good as anything he did earlier in his career.
 
    And Neil Young's output in the 90's was excellent.
 
    Steve Earle's albums since getting out of the clink at 40 have been better than his earlier output, with the exception of his last album.
yeah, Tom Petty could be called folk, and so could anything Neil Young has done lately.  But those are two good ones, and Nick Lowe.  I knew you people were smarter than record store clerks  ;)
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: markie on September 09, 2003, 03:39:00 pm
I like the second of the bonus tracks..... The kelly song did prick up my ears as well though.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: ggw on September 09, 2003, 03:41:00 pm
There are many who are above 40 and still good, but I can't think of any "rock" artist who is better after 40 than before.  Rock is a young man's game.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: sonickteam2 on September 09, 2003, 03:43:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  There are many who are above 40 and still good, but I can't think of any "rock" artist who is better after 40 than before.  Rock is a young man's game.
That was why it was such as intriguing conversation.  get it?
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: Sir HC on September 09, 2003, 03:45:00 pm
The guys from the Flaming Lips are well into their forties.  I hate their early pre-Transmissions stuff.
 
 Morphine's M. Sandman was in his 40's when he started the band.  So I guess everything before that was crap as there was nothing.
 
 Fred Schnieder from the B-52s.  Still looks the same.  No new albums though.
 
 Helios Creed.  His work has been getting better with  age.  Didn't really like his early stuff, though I haven't listened to Chrome.
 
 Mission of Burma bassist Clint Connolly (or however it is spelled).  His band Consonant is great.  Though I guess the early stuff was quite good too.
 
 Massive Attack.  Forget which guy is in his 40's, but they didn't get rolling until the second album.  Daddy G I think is the old fart.
 
 there are more, I have to remember...
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer on September 09, 2003, 03:46:00 pm
Mark Sandman was the leader of Treat Her Right before Morphine. I liked them better than Morphine...
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by Sir HC:
  The guys from the Flaming Lips are well into their forties.  I hate their early pre-Transmissions stuff.
 
 Morphine's M. Sandman was in his 40's when he started the band.  So I guess everything before that was crap as there was nothing.
 
 Fred Schnieder from the B-52s.  Still looks the same.  No new albums though.
 
 Helios Creed.  His work has been getting better with  age.  Didn't really like his early stuff, though I haven't listened to Chrome.
 
 Mission of Burma bassist Clint Connolly (or however it is spelled).  His band Consonant is great.  Though I guess the early stuff was quite good too.
 
 Massive Attack.  Forget which guy is in his 40's, but they didn't get rolling until the second album.  Daddy G I think is the old fart.
 
 there are more, I have to remember...
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: markie on September 09, 2003, 03:46:00 pm
I would like to repeat David Gedge and Matt Johnson.....
 
 and add a Mark E Smith of the Fall. I dont know if he got better, but it appears to me he just stayed the same.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: sonickteam2 on September 09, 2003, 03:46:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Sir HC:
  The guys from the Flaming Lips are well into their forties.  I hate their early pre-Transmissions stuff.
 
Flaming Lips....you should win a prize, though, i did not know they were in thier forties, and some would say they are not rock....but someone always does.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: sonickteam2 on September 09, 2003, 03:48:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Anton Newcombe:
  I would like to repeat David Gedge and Matt Johnson.....
 
 and add a Mark E Smith of the Fall. I dont know if he got better, but it appears to me he just stayed the same.
Dave Gedge very good shit.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: markie on September 09, 2003, 03:49:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Sir HC:
 
 Massive Attack.  Forget which guy is in his 40's, but they didn't get rolling until the second album.  Daddy G I think is the old fart.
 
 
WHAT?
 
 their first album is a masterpiece. It created the whole trip hop genre. I didnt think any of the main members of Massive attack were that old. Horace Andy who always does some of the vocals is, he was a great reggae guy in the 70's.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: Sir HC on September 09, 2003, 03:51:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by sonickteam2:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Sir HC:
  The guys from the Flaming Lips are well into their forties.  I hate their early pre-Transmissions stuff.
 
Flaming Lips....you should win a prize, though, i did not know they were in thier forties, and some would say they are not rock....but someone always does. [/b]
Have an article from around the time of Clouds Taste Metallic.  When Transmissions came out they were mid-thirties.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: Sir HC on September 09, 2003, 03:52:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Anton Newcombe:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Sir HC:
 
 Massive Attack.  Forget which guy is in his 40's, but they didn't get rolling until the second album.  Daddy G I think is the old fart.
 
 
WHAT?
 
 their first album is a masterpiece. It created the whole trip hop genre. I didnt think any of the main members of Massive attack were that old. Horace Andy who always does some of the vocals is, he was a great reggae guy in the 70's. [/b]
It hasn't aged as well as the others to me.  It was brilliant and started a movement but then they got better.  Mezzanine to me is their peak.  Yeah, Daddy G supposedly was doing sound systems for years before Massive Attack.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: Sir HC on September 09, 2003, 03:54:00 pm
Oh yeah and how can we forget Sonic Youth?
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: sonickteam2 on September 09, 2003, 03:55:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Sir HC:
  Oh yeah and how can we forget Sonic Youth?
but i dont think they are better now. than in the 80s.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer on September 09, 2003, 03:57:00 pm
Why would someone say Flaming Lips are not a rock band?
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by sonickteam2:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Sir HC:
  The guys from the Flaming Lips are well into their forties.  I hate their early pre-Transmissions stuff.
 
Flaming Lips....you should win a prize, though, i did not know they were in thier forties, and some would say they are not rock....but someone always does. [/b]
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: markie on September 09, 2003, 03:58:00 pm
from the best I could find:
 
 "Daddy G's is around mid-December 1959 (Sagittarius), and 3D's is around late January/mid-February 1966 "
 
 so if that is right, makes Mezzanine mostly done before he was 40. I really dont see them doing anything worthwhile again. 100 broken windows is approaching unlistenable.
 
 I still think blue lines is the best. Hymn of the big wheel and for the complete sound of the album.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: Sir HC on September 09, 2003, 04:01:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Anton Newcombe:
  from the best I could find:
 
 "Daddy G's is around mid-December 1959 (Sagittarius), and 3D's is around late January/mid-February 1966 "
 
 so if that is right, makes Mezzanine mostly done before he was 40. I really dont see them doing anything worthwhile again. 100 broken windows is approaching unlistenable.
 
 I still think blue lines is the best. Hymn of the big wheel and for the complete sound of the album.
I based it on an interview with them when Mezzanine came out with him saying he was 40.  It was Option Magazine, still have it around somewhere, will look at the date and all.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: sonickteam2 on September 09, 2003, 04:04:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
  Why would someone say Flaming Lips are not a rock band?
[/QB][/QUOTE]
 
 
  crazy people, thats who!
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: markie on September 09, 2003, 04:07:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Sir HC:
   when Mezzanine came out with him saying he was 40.  
that would fit, but they had been working on Mezzanine for 3 years before it was released. So he probably wasnt 40 when working on it.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: Bags on September 09, 2003, 06:27:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
  I thought Tom Petty was a folk artist.
 
What??  Man, he's the grandaddy of southern rock, in all its forms.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: Bags on September 09, 2003, 06:32:00 pm
Bob Mould, yes
 
 Paul Westerberg, NO
 
 Bob Pollard, yes
 
 You said aged well, not better, right?  If that's the premise, I think Pollard is better, Mould is excellent but early 90s was almost unbeatable, and Westerberg just makes me sad.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: walkman on September 09, 2003, 06:47:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by bags:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
  I thought Tom Petty was a folk artist.
 
What??  Man, he's the grandaddy of southern rock, in all its forms. [/b]
QUE??  Petty definitely dabbled in southern rock sounds, but his first album was in '76!  And was, at least to my ears, pretty much a rootsy take on  early new-wave.  The Allman Brothers invented Southern Rock (first album 1969) and Lynyrd Skynyrd released Free Bird in '73, so I can't really see calling Petty the grandaddy of southern rock.  But, true enough, he ain't no folk artist either.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: Bags on September 09, 2003, 11:41:00 pm
You're right, walkman, he's not southern rock.  I was just rebelling too hard against the folk label (not that there's anything wrong with that!).
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: jadetree on September 09, 2003, 11:44:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by bags:
  Bob Mould, yes
 
 Paul Westerberg, NO
 
 Bob Pollard, yes
 
 You said aged well, not better, right?  If that's the premise, I think Pollard is better, Mould is excellent but early 90s was almost unbeatable, and Westerberg just makes me sad.
While I still think Pollard is great now, his early songs can't be beat - none of the newer albums are as good as Propeller or Alien Lanes.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: Mobius on September 10, 2003, 10:00:00 am
Lucinda Williams.
 
 Surprisingly difficult question.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: mankie on September 10, 2003, 10:05:00 am
Not really better, but have not lost it north of 40.
 
 
 Paul Heaton
 David Bowie
 Elvis Costello
 Johhny Marr
 Richard Butler
 Bruce Springsteen
 John Menstralcramps
 Marianne Faithful
 
 
 Old age pensioners who need to give it up and head off into the retirement home
 
 The Rolling Stones
 KISS
 Aerosmith
 Van Halen
 
 
 Finally, were the Grateful Dead EVER younger than 40?
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: thirsty moore on September 10, 2003, 10:05:00 am
Difficult question indeed!  Maybe Nick Cave?
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: Venerable Bede on September 10, 2003, 10:20:00 am
Quote
Originally posted by thirsty moore:
  Difficult question indeed!  Maybe Nick Cave?
that's exactly of who i was thinking.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer on September 10, 2003, 10:36:00 am
I was going to say her, but her pre-40 something stuff is good as well.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by Mobius:
  Lucinda Williams.
 
 Surprisingly difficult question.
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: chknfngrs on September 10, 2003, 10:49:00 am
neil emmer effen young
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: poorlulu on September 10, 2003, 10:54:00 am
naaaaaah
 
 they are all shite now...............
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: Sir HC on September 15, 2003, 03:24:00 pm
Found some others for the list:
 
 Brian Eno 1948
 Wayne Coyne (flaming lips) Born 1960
 Bevis Frond's Nick Salomon (11-03-1953) started 1986
 Peter Gabriel (born February 13, 1950)
 Lee Ranaldo born 3 February 1956
 1958 Paul Barker is born.
 1959 Alain Jourgensen is born.
 Gibby Haynes
 Rick Smith (41) and Karl Hyde of Underworld (been around since 1981 with Freur)
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: Jaguär on September 15, 2003, 03:27:00 pm
Arthur Lee (Love)
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: Ryan on September 16, 2003, 07:50:00 am
R. Kelly  :(   )
Title: Re: over the hill?
Post by: Sir HC on September 16, 2003, 09:51:00 am
And George Clinton (he is my mom's age), born in 1941.