930 Forums
=> GENERAL DISCUSSION => Topic started by: bearman🐻 on July 17, 2007, 10:59:00 am
-
http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/Music/07/17/music.newclassics.ap/index.html (http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/Music/07/17/music.newclassics.ap/index.html)
-
It blows my mind that Back in Black sold almost half a million copies last year.
We got this cool shirt for our 3 year old son at the beach last year.
<img src="http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:nb_e-Z_loI1_LM:http://www.babyvintage.net/Quickstart/ImageLib" alt=" - " />
-
I know I've had at least three copies of Back in Black since I was 13.
-
That article confirms my theory that simply put, AC/DC is the shit. Period.
Sometimes the public is right . . . .
-
At least they got the release date right for Back in Black (1980) in that article. The version that appeared in the Baltimore Sun today had it coming out in 1990, which means I must have heard a REALLY advance copy of "You Shook Me All Night Long" at every single prom and homecoming I ever went to.
-
I like how they say My Bloody Valentine's "Loveless" sells "under 12,000" copies a year. What? Sales figures for "In the Aeroplane Over the Sea" weren't available?
Brian
-
uh, yeah right.
Originally posted by TheDirector217:
That article confirms my theory that simply put, AC/DC is the shit. Period.
Sometimes the public is right . . . .
-
Originally posted by TheDirector217:
That article confirms my theory that simply put, AC/DC is the shit. Period.
Sometimes the public is right . . . .
Thought it proved their fans are big stoners who forget that they already own it. :D