930 Forums

=> GENERAL DISCUSSION => Topic started by: xcanuck on June 12, 2006, 12:14:00 pm

Title: Joe Jackson
Post by: xcanuck on June 12, 2006, 12:14:00 pm
Any other suckers out there who paid $40 each to see Joe tonite? I admit it...I got a ticket. But it's been YEARS since I saw him and his "Night and Day" album was a huge part of my university soundtrack.
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: Bags on June 12, 2006, 01:03:00 pm
I'm such a sucker I have three extra tickets, which I'm *hoping* to get rid of for $35 or so bucks tonight.  It's JJ and Graham Maby -- I thought this would sell out quick.
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: bearman🐻 on June 12, 2006, 01:46:00 pm
I think I'll be there!
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: sanderssam on June 12, 2006, 02:22:00 pm
raul midon is awesome... but im not paying $40 to see him and some other guy from ages ago that no one cares about.
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer on June 12, 2006, 02:23:00 pm
Raul Midon is boooooring.
 
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by Some Guy:
  raul midon is awesome... but im not paying $40 to see him and some other guy from ages ago that no one cares about.
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: Bombay Chutney on June 12, 2006, 02:46:00 pm
Wouldn't miss it.  Should be great.
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: jollyjim on June 12, 2006, 02:59:00 pm
What is his set list like these days......is he going to do some old stuff or what ever new stuff he is into - i aint paying 40 to hear some new experimental.......
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: Bags on June 12, 2006, 03:00:00 pm
I'm checking out Duff's about 8:45 until just about Joe time, if anyone wants to try a $4.00 20 oz Guinness with me!
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: xcanuck on June 12, 2006, 03:05:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Bags:
  I'm checking out Duff's about 8:45 until just about Joe time, if anyone wants to try a $4.00 20 oz Guinness with me!
Look for us at Duffs! We should be there in time to watch the second period of the hockey game, then over to the club to see Joe.
 
 I'm hoping that this lineup means that we'll hear more of the stuff from the 1979-1984 period.
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: slipkid on June 12, 2006, 04:35:00 pm
What time is Joe Jackson time? I know this is the kick off night of the tour - so who knows what they will play.  It's Graham and Dave Houghton - the original drummer from the 80s stuff.
 
 I think I will skip Raul and just show up for Joe Jackson.
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: bearman🐻 on June 12, 2006, 04:46:00 pm
10pm
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: mizerock on June 12, 2006, 04:52:00 pm
I'll be there - I haven't seen him in YEARS but he was a favorite of mine back in HS.  Actually, I think I last saw him was at Hammerjacks in Baltimore - the old one, it was demolished to make room for the football stadium.  His opening act was a quiet young lady accompanied by a cello player - by FAR the quietest act ever to play Hammerjacks - it was really pretty ridiculous.
 
 I haven't heard of Raul Midon before but I'm looking forward to checking him out as a free bonus.  And it's not a sellout?  I guess $40 is too much, OR most of the people old enough to appreciate him aren't willing to stay up past midnight on a school night   ;)
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: Bags on June 12, 2006, 08:07:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by mizerock:
  Actually, I think I last saw him was at Hammerjacks in Baltimore - the old one, it was demolished to make room for the football stadium.  
Was that 1991 or 1992?  If so, I was there!!!
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: bearman🐻 on June 13, 2006, 09:51:00 am
Since no one else has posted anything about the show, I'll take a stab. Joe Jackson is great, extremely talented, a gifted pianist, and the band were fantastic. My issue was with his fans, most of who were obnoxiously loud, talked more and more as the night went on, and couldn't stand in one spot. I had about 6 people literally walk right into me last night, and it wasn't even crowded. I guess maybe some people don't get out to concerts much and thus aren't socially conditioned. But why drop 40 clams to go to a concert when you're just going to stand there to drink, smoke, talk, and not even listen to the music? It's not like it was a loud rock show. It was pretty disappointing to me that people would go to a show and behave like that. But the fact of the matter is the minute you walk through that door of the club, you're not entering what is just a bar...it is a concert venue, and there are musicians on stage who deserve some degree of respect and attention. Why bother going at all if you could do what you are doing across the street in the Irish place? You'd have a hell of a lot more money for booze.
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: xcanuck on June 13, 2006, 09:52:00 am
Well, that was a DAMN fine show. It was apparently the first show of the tour, but there weren't any real flaws. He played for about 1hr 40 mins but it  seemed to speed by. Joe may be looking his age, but he sure doesn't sound like it. His voice was strong and dead on. I was also really impressed with his piano playing. He may not have flashy chops (a la Ben Folds) but he does have some serious, jazz influenced technique.
 
 He played alot of the 'classics' - Stepping Out, Slow Song, It's Different For Girls, Is She Really Going Out With Him - but there were a few songs that he left out like Sunday Papers, Look Sharp and I'm The Man.
 
 At one point, he was playing a new song, and I remarked to my wife (xcanuckette? le maudit americain?) that he was using the "Steely Dan" chord quite a bit - it's an add9 or add2 chord, depending on how you voice it. And what does he do but follow it up with an outstanding cover of Steely Dan's Rose Darling (from Katy Lied). Excellent!!! Definitely some influence there.
 
 Overall, it really was worth the $40. Joe was in great shape and I continue to be impressed with Graham Maby's bass playing.
 
 One quick (catty) word about the crowd. Holy crap. Average age was mid 40s and showing it. I hope I don't look like that when I hit 40. Oh, wait...   :roll:
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: xcanuck on June 13, 2006, 09:56:00 am
Quote
Originally posted by bearman:
  My issue was with his fans, most of who were obnoxiously loud, talked more and more as the night went on, and couldn't stand in one spot.  
Yeah - I didn't want to get *too* catty but the crowd was the type that rarely gets out to shows anymore (strains of Bob Seger's Rock and Roll Never Forgets run through my mind). They just wanted to wait to hear The Hits and ignored anything else. I felt bad for Joe a few times when he was playing a great solo and people were talking quite loudly. I'm hoping the monitors were loud enough to cover up the chit chat.
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer on June 13, 2006, 10:12:00 am
Maybe the show wasn't that good if the crowd wasn't into it?
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: Bags on June 13, 2006, 10:14:00 am
Quote
Originally posted by xcanuck:
  Well, that was a DAMN fine show. It was He played alot of the 'classics' - Stepping Out, Slow Song, It's Different For Girls, Is She Really Going Out With Him - but there were a few songs that he left out like Sunday Papers, Look Sharp and I'm The Man.
 
During "Is She Really Going Out With Him," I was thinking that I know it's the biggest 'hit,' but I'd much rather hear I'm the Man, Sunday Papers, Beat Crazy or Happy Loving Couples....whatcha gonna do.
 
 Good show -- spot on about the crowd, xcanuck.  It was funny to see these groups of 3 to 4 mid-40s men who were clearly there together.  It's like a time machine window of a crowd you'd see at, say, The Editors -- 20 years later without the baseball hats, less hair but same cool tees.   ;)
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: Guiny on June 13, 2006, 10:14:00 am
Quote
Originally posted by xcanuck:
 I felt bad for Joe a few times when he was playing a great solo and people were talking quite loudly. I'm hoping the monitors were loud enough to cover up the chit chat. [/QB]
He got paid for it, so don't feel to bad for him.
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: Bags on June 13, 2006, 10:36:00 am
Quote
Originally posted by xcanuck:
  They just wanted to wait to hear The Hits and ignored anything else. I felt bad for Joe a few times when he was playing a great solo and people were talking quite loudly. I'm hoping the monitors were loud enough to cover up the chit chat.
If you noticed, during the new songs half the folks weren't paying attention at all -- talking, etc.  What's funny about that is the crowd gave GREAT cheering, hooting, yelling, clapping etc., to Joe -- so seemingly they were really in to it.
 
 I actually thought that all the moving around was an aspect of the crowd size -- in other words, there was room to move around, so folks did.  WE noticed the same thing -- I was mid-crowd, and you would have thought there was a designated walkway in front of us, with little lights on the ground leading you to the bar.
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: Bombay Chutney on June 13, 2006, 01:03:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Chaz Nakatestes, Breaststroking Guy:
  Maybe the show wasn't that good if the crowd wasn't into it?
No - It was the crowd.  There's really no excuse for facing away from the stage, screaming at your friend who's about 5 feet away from you, during the second song, which is a fairly quiet solo-piano tune.
 
 Joe was fantastic.  Too bad most of the people around me didn't pay any attention.
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: diract22 on June 13, 2006, 01:26:00 pm
Hi. I'm seeing Joe tonight, outside of Philly, so I just stopped by to see some reviews. Sounds like a good show. Tonights venue has seats.
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: Dr. Anton Phibes on June 13, 2006, 01:33:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by xcanuck:
   
Quote
Originally posted by bearman:
  My issue was with his fans, most of who were obnoxiously loud, talked more and more as the night went on, and couldn't stand in one spot.  
Yeah - I didn't want to get *too* catty but the crowd was the type that rarely gets out to shows anymore (strains of Bob Seger's Rock and Roll Never Forgets run through my mind). They just wanted to wait to hear The Hits and ignored anything else. I felt bad for Joe a few times when he was playing a great solo and people were talking quite loudly. I'm hoping the monitors were loud enough to cover up the chit chat. [/b]
>>>Here's the funny thing...........and I'm not naming names.......but,some of the same folks who bitch about the Birchmere's "quiet" policy are some of the same folks who bitch about the groups of obnoxious assholes who regularly prowl the 9:30 floor.....I have made a habit of NOT going to the 9:30 when there is someone who may be playing acoustically or might have a "softer" playlist than the usual higher decibel bands who are the norm.........and I say "norm" meaning those of the louder,sometimes heavier variety......If I'm going to be paying a Birchmere-sized ticket price... 40 clams or above.....then I would enjoy HEARING the fucking show!......I have no problem with Birchmere staff telling obnoxious, shitbag yuppies, to turn off their fucking phones, and take their goddamn inane conversations out into the bar....it sounds like Joe Jackson would have been better served at the Birch.....just my 2 cents.....
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: Bags on June 13, 2006, 01:39:00 pm
What's so funny about the Birchmere is the INTENSE level of quiet.  Literally, not a person speaks or whispers to a friend, "good song."  And for a lot of the shows at the Birch, that makes sense.  I, personally, find it funny and overly reverential.  But I agree that it's preferable to the very chatty folks treating a show like any other random bar night.  I thought I'd lose my mind at a Wrens show at the Black Cat.
 
 Last night for Joe was odd because in some ways the crowd was SO in to him, then half of them didn't really pay attention to about half the set.
 
   
Quote
Originally posted by Dr. Jonas Sulk:
  Here's the funny thing...........and I'm not naming names.......but,some of the same folks who bitch about the Birchmere's "quiet" policy are some of the same folks who bitch about the groups of obnoxious assholes who regularly prowl the 9:30 floor.....I have made a habit of NOT going to the 9:30 when there is someone who may be playing acoustically or might have a "softer" playlist than the usual higher decibel bands who are the norm.........and I say "norm" meaning those of the louder,sometimes heavier variety......If I'm going to be paying a Birchmere-sized ticket price... 40 clams or above.....then I would enjoy HEARING the fucking show!......I have no problem with Birchmere staff telling obnoxious, shitbag yuppies, to turn off their fucking phones, and take their goddamn inane conversations out into the bar....it sounds like Joe Jackson would have been better served at the Birch.....just my 2 cents.....
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: kosmo vinyl on June 14, 2006, 09:13:00 am
Two of my worst experiences regarding the audience talking were at Joe Jackson concerts and it's because he has just enough hits the casual fans show up expecting to hear nothing else...
 
 On the Big World tour, not one of his more shining moments but still, the chatter was so loud in the venue that Joe himself told those uninterested in what the band was doing to  "Fuck off to the bar".  On the "Body & Soul" some women decided to carry on a lengthy and loud one side conversation for a good part of the show, then got indigent when I shushed her.
 
 The Day and Night show however was amazing the audience completely respectful for what Joe and his extended group were doing that night.
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: bearman🐻 on June 14, 2006, 09:57:00 am
I just don't understand the talking thing. It doesn't happen too often for me, but the worst that I can remember before this Joe Jackson show was seeing Air in 2001. I actually ended up telling the people point blank to shut the fuck up. I have a lot of patience usually, but these folks were right up by the stage, not even at the bar. I hate that shit. I've seen Bob Mould actually single people out and tell them to shut up. Once in Chicago there was a great rant he did on this girl...brilliant. She really did deserve it though.
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: Frank Gallagher on June 15, 2006, 02:58:00 am
"OI! TWAT! WILL YOU SHUT THE FUCK UP!?....I'M TRYING TO DO A FUCKING GIG HERE!!!"
 
 
 Peter Murphy, Lisner Auditorium, Washington DC. 1989(ish)
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: kosmo vinyl on June 15, 2006, 05:31:00 am
Quote
Originally posted by Roadbike Mankie:
  "OI! TWAT! WILL YOU SHUT THE FUCK UP!?....I'M TRYING TO DO A FUCKING GIG HERE!!!"
 
 
 Peter Murphy, Lisner Auditorium, Washington DC. 1989(ish)
i'm half tempted to go over to cafepress and create a t-shirt with that quote on it...  maybe a whole line of no talking t-shirts
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: on June 15, 2006, 08:21:00 am
Hey, they paid their good money.  They can talk all they want.  It's not like they are lighting up joints?
 
 I'm half tempted to go for a show wearing a Depends.  And right in the middle of Peter Murphy's set I'm gonna squeeze out a huge steaming shit and let it churn in my diaper for the rest of the show.  And talk loudly a lot too!
Title: Re: Joe Jackson
Post by: bearman🐻 on June 15, 2006, 09:41:00 am
At least if they had lit up joints they would have been mellow enough to shut the hell up!