930 Forums
=> GENERAL DISCUSSION => Topic started by: Bags on February 10, 2004, 11:44:00 am
-
Though I'm sure not a one of you men here on the board knows or 'dallies' with women in that category so would look at such a product (http://www.nypost.com/entertainment/17566.htm) as a lark, an experimental lark... :D
-
And there are plenty of them: a recent University of Chicago study found that 26 percent of the women polled didn't have orgasms.
I'll bet that correlates to 26% of men who refuse to eat pussy (probably gay). Or 26% of women who for some inexplicable reason don't like to have their pussy eaten.
-
It's the story of my life......
"IT'S three inches long, covered in bumps and doesn't look like anything you'd want to see in bed"
-
Originally posted by Rutherford J. Balls:
And there are plenty of them: a recent University of Chicago study found that 26 percent of the women polled didn't have orgasms.
I'll bet that correlates to 26% of men who refuse to eat pussy (probably gay). Or 26% of women who for some inexplicable reason don't like to have their pussy eaten.
26% of women are over what age? Could the statistic be misleading?
-
In fact, if you go with age, Markie, it's younger women who are less orgasmic.... I don't have time to google, but I'll bet someone does.
-
Sorry, I should have quoted the first paragraph. The first paragraph was from Bags' article, the second paragraph was my comment.
That said, I don'ty think the article got specific regarding ages.
Originally posted by mark e smith:
Originally posted by Rutherford J. Balls:
And there are plenty of them: a recent University of Chicago study found that 26 percent of the women polled didn't have orgasms.
I'll bet that correlates to 26% of men who refuse to eat pussy (probably gay). Or 26% of women who for some inexplicable reason don't like to have their pussy eaten.
26% of women are over what age? Could the statistic be misleading? [/b]
-
Originally posted by Bags:
Though I'm sure not a one of you men here on the board knows or 'dallies' with women in that category so would look at such a product (http://www.nypost.com/entertainment/17566.htm) as a lark, an experimental lark... :D
<img src="http://pages.prodigy.net/indianahawkeye/newpage41/13.gif" alt=" - " />
-
Originally posted by Bags:
In fact, if you go with age, Markie, it's younger women who are less orgasmic
Not with me. :p
Yes, but do many 70 year olds still come? Do you even want to think about it? As it said women, I presume the study was on over 18s.... But its a meaningless statistic to bandy about.
-
Regardless of the statistic, I think we can all agree that there are a lot of women who have trouble climaxing all the time, most of the time, and even some of the time. I'd bet that the actual numbers are even higher than 26% if you include women who climax only "some of the time."
So who's gonna be the guinea pig and get out there and try Viella...or whatever the hell it was called!
-
doesn't samantha like guinea pigs............?
-
They should tell their partner to keep licking. Sometimes it takes awhile.
Originally posted by Bags:
Regardless of the statistic, I think we can all agree that there are a lot of women who have trouble climaxing all the time, most of the time, and even some of the time. I'd bet that the actual numbers are even higher than 26% if you include women who climax only "some of the time."
So who's gonna be the guinea pig and get out there and try Viella...or whatever the hell it was called!
-
"February 10, 2004 -- IT'S three inches long, covered in bumps and doesn't look like anything you'd want to see in bed. "
That's nothing new...Brit women were banging doodles back during WW2.
-
70% of women NEVER achieve orgasm through intercourse. Again, that's why god gave us oral sex.
Originally posted by Bags:
Regardless of the statistic, I think we can all agree that there are a lot of women who have trouble climaxing all the time, most of the time, and even some of the time. I'd bet that the actual numbers are even higher than 26% if you include women who climax only "some of the time."
So who's gonna be the guinea pig and get out there and try Viella...or whatever the hell it was called!
-
Originally posted by Rutherford J. Balls:
[QB] 70% of women NEVER achieve orgasm through intercourse. Again, that's why god gave us oral sex.
doesnt the bible say oral sex is evil?
If you had hands you could stimulate the clitoris whilst having sex.
-
I don't know. I don't read the bible. I'd be interested in hearing the passage that says that, if indeed it does. I think it's probably more along the lines of any sex that's not specifically designed for procreation is evil, but that's just a guess.
Originally posted by mark e smith:
Originally posted by Rutherford J. Balls:
[QB] 70% of women NEVER achieve orgasm through intercourse. Again, that's why god gave us oral sex.
doesnt the bible say oral sex is evil?
If you had hands you could stimulate the clitoris whilst having sex. [/b]
-
Song 2:3, "Like an apple tree among the trees of the forest, so is my beloved among the young men. In his shade I took great delight and sat down, and his fruit was sweet to my taste."
Song 4:16, "Awake, O north wind, and come, wind of the south; make my garden breathe out fragrance. Let its spices be wafted abroad. May my beloved come into his garden and eat its choice fruits!?
-
Originally posted by poorlulu:
doesn't samantha like guinea pigs............?
<img src="http://www.thedisco.demon.co.uk/lulu.jpg" alt=" - " />
...sorry
-
"In clinical trials, The Journal of the British Association for Sexual and Relationship Therapy found the wonder product halved the time it took women to reach orgasm - from about 13 minutes to just under 6. And they weren't faking."
Women who have orgasms within 13 minutes cannot really be a useful test group to represent women who have great difficulty having orgasms...and from 13 minutes to 6 minutes? What's the hurry anyway?
-
Originally posted by Celeste:
Women who have orgasms within 13 minutes cannot really be a useful test group to represent women who have great difficulty having orgasms...and from 13 minutes to 6 minutes? What's the hurry anyway?
Probably thinking of a Gaussian distribution. Shifting the bell curve to less time to acheive the goal, will move more women to completion before the time boredom or wristache sets in.
-
I guess I do see how one could do your bell curve thingy and extrapolate that a similar decrease in time required could help someone for whom it took, say 30 or 45 minutes to do it in 15 or 23 minutes, maybe...but using people that have orgasms already in 13 minutes average is using a group that is bound to show success. The 30 and 45 minute gals may have more trouble in general...anyway...seems like a neat thing.
I prefer Rhett, though, but he's not on the market.
-
hey dupek.........
no offense taken......
http://sherm.20megsfree.com/burgerking.swf (http://sherm.20megsfree.com/burgerking.swf)
-
Originally posted by Celeste:
I prefer Rhett, though, but he's not on the market.
And the world thanks you for taking him off the market!
-
Originally posted by mankie:
Originally posted by Celeste:
I prefer Rhett, though, but he's not on the market.
And the world thanks you for taking him off the market! [/b]
<img src="http://www.illlogic.net/images/owned.gif" alt=" - " />
-
Originally posted by mark e smith:
Originally posted by Celeste:
Women who have orgasms within 13 minutes cannot really be a useful test group to represent women who have great difficulty having orgasms...and from 13 minutes to 6 minutes? What's the hurry anyway?
Probably thinking of a Gaussian distribution. Shifting the bell curve to less time to acheive the goal, will move more women to completion before the time boredom or wristache sets in. [/b]
Not to mention you can sort the missus out during halftime, or between periods of the hockey game!
-
Originally posted by mankie:
Not to mention you can sort the missus out during halftime, or between periods of the hockey game!
see, this is why NASCAR is so great...since all they do is drive around and around anyway, you can fool around whilst you sort of watch the race and not miss much...and if there's a crash or something good, you just take a break and pick up where you left off...
-
Originally posted by Celeste:
Originally posted by mankie:
Not to mention you can sort the missus out during halftime, or between periods of the hockey game!
see, this is why NASCAR is so great...since all they do is drive around and around anyway, you can fool around whilst you sort of watch the race and not miss much...and if there's a crash or something good, you just take a break and pick up where you left off... [/b]
Why do Canadians only have sex doggie-style?
So they can both watch the hockey game eh!
-
if someone buys it for me I'll try it :D
-
Wait. I don't understand? Is it just a vibrator?