930 Forums

=> GENERAL DISCUSSION => Topic started by: G.Love on December 04, 2003, 06:31:00 pm

Title: Jagger knighthood: Richards rages
Post by: G.Love on December 04, 2003, 06:31:00 pm

"I told Mick it's a paltry honor ... It's not what the  Stones (http://www.cnn.com/2003/SHOWBIZ/Music/12/04/jagger.richards.reut/index.html)is about, is it?"

Title: Re: Jagger knighthood: Richards rages
Post by: Sir HC on December 04, 2003, 07:16:00 pm

First read it as "Jaguar Kighthood...", knew she was into the British rock but wow!

Title: Re: Jagger knighthood: Richards rages
Post by: Jaguär on December 04, 2003, 10:48:00 pm

LOL. Yes, the British monarchy created the title in my honour.    :D  It's quite the distinquished award and must pass my with my approval.

Title: Re: Jagger knighthood: Richards rages
Post by: Bags on December 04, 2003, 10:53:00 pm

Quote

Originally posted by Sir HC:
  First read it as "Jaguar Kighthood...", knew she was into the British rock but wow!

That's so funny -- so did I!!!

Title: Re: Jagger knighthood: Richards rages
Post by: on December 04, 2003, 11:38:00 pm

<img src="http://i.cnn.net/cnn/2003/SHOWBIZ/Music/12/04/jagger.richards.reut/story.stones.jpg" alt=" - " />
 Keith could have at least had the decency to put his uppers in for the photo.

Title: Re: Jagger knighthood: Richards rages
Post by: flawd101 on December 05, 2003, 07:04:00 pm

they look like hobbits!!!!!!!!specially keith

Title: Re: Jagger knighthood: Richards rages
Post by: on December 06, 2003, 10:35:00 am

Which do you prefer?  The road-grizzled, but real Keith, or the regal, but  'Guy Smiley'-android, Mick? <img src="http://pages.prodigy.net/rogerlori1/emoticons/robot.gif" alt=" - " />

Title: Re: Jagger knighthood: Richards rages
Post by: tooms on December 06, 2003, 05:50:00 pm

Keith rules.