930 Forums

=> GENERAL DISCUSSION => Topic started by: chaz on July 08, 2005, 02:42:00 pm

Title: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: chaz on July 08, 2005, 02:42:00 pm
In terms of sheer influence, I'll take Skynard any day.
 
 USA kicks ass!
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: thirsty moore on July 08, 2005, 02:43:00 pm
Who had the better haircuts?
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: Sir HC on July 08, 2005, 02:48:00 pm
Skynyrd?
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: kosmo vinyl on July 08, 2005, 02:48:00 pm
nowadays early stones, mid period beatles,  in high school LS before the crash.
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: chaz on July 08, 2005, 03:00:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Sir HC:
  Skynyrd?
Indeed.
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: godsshoeshine on July 08, 2005, 03:33:00 pm
skynard INVENTED classic rock
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: walkonby on July 08, 2005, 06:15:00 pm
i heard this crazy song the other day for the first time:  it was called something like "nelly vs. skynard", with the song called  "sweet home country something or other."  my feet were tapping as my brain was reeling from the fact.  i hate it when you try to hate something, but then you almost can't.
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: eddie on July 08, 2005, 10:35:00 pm
http://mei-lwun.com/www_music/Sweet%20Home%20Counrty%20Grammar.mp3 (http://mei-lwun.com/www_music/Sweet%20Home%20Counrty%20Grammar.mp3)
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: MAXX44 on July 09, 2005, 12:45:00 am
I hate to admit it...it's catchy as hell...
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: chaz on July 09, 2005, 07:54:00 am
The other day I saw the video for that Nelly song calle "Trapped in the closet" or something.  I swear at first I thought that it was some sort of parody or something.  The words to that song are so freaking silly.  Has anyone seen or heard that song/video?
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: mike9182 on July 10, 2005, 11:08:00 pm
beatles for me.
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: Relaxer on July 10, 2005, 11:26:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Fine French Chaz:
  In terms of sheer influence, I'll take Skynard any day.
 
 USA kicks ass!
The Beatles are the most influential pop group of all time and to deny that is to either deny reality or to not understand what music was before and after the Beatles. What did Skynyrd contribute to rock and roll that no other band did? If Skynrd never existed, how is the musical world any different? They were a fine band who produced some fine songs and albums, but the Beatles' music literally changed how half the world listens to and appreciates music, and that was just while they were still an existing band. Not even Elvis was as influential as the Beatles, since he never wrote a song in his life.
 
 Hell, you can't even spell their name right. How much of a fan could you be?
 
 And if you were just being ironic or satirical, well gosh, that sure was funny.
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: MAXX44 on July 10, 2005, 11:44:00 pm
Chaz...that video is by R. Kelly...not Nelly
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: chaz on July 11, 2005, 09:11:00 am
Quote
Originally posted by Relaxer:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Fine French Chaz:
  In terms of sheer influence, I'll take Skynard any day.
 
 USA kicks ass!
The Beatles are the most influential pop group of all time and to deny that is to either deny reality or to not understand what music was before and after the Beatles. What did Skynyrd contribute to rock and roll that no other band did? If Skynrd never existed, how is the musical world any different? They were a fine band who produced some fine songs and albums, but the Beatles' music literally changed how half the world listens to and appreciates music, and that was just while they were still an existing band. Not even Elvis was as influential as the Beatles, since he never wrote a song in his life.
 
  [/b]
Dude any southern rock band...Allmans, Skynyrd, Molly Hatchett beats any of that wussy brit rock anyday.  USA RULES, got it?
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: chaz on July 11, 2005, 09:14:00 am
Quote
Originally posted by MAXX44:
  Chaz...that video is by R. Kelly...not Nelly
Yeah sorry, thanks.  Hilarious song.  It's like an SNL skit.  Surely R. Kelly can't be serious.
 
 Shh, shh, quiet
 Hurry up and get in the closet"
 She said, "Don't you make a sound
 Or some shit is going down"
 I said, "Why don't I just go out the window?"
 "Yes, except for one thing, we on the 5th floor"
 "Think, think, quick, put me in the closet"
 And now I'm in this darkest closet, tryin' to figure out
 Just how I'm gonna get my crazy ass up out this house
 
 Then he walks in and yells, "I'm home"
 She says, "Honey, I'm in the room"
 He walks in there with a smile on his face
 Sayin', "Honey, I've been missin' you"
 She hops all over him
 And says, "I've cooked and ran your bath water"
 I'm tellin' you now, this girl's so good that she deserves an Oscar
 
 Rolls her in the bed
 And start to snatchin' her clothes off
 I'm in the closet, like man, what the fuck is going on?
 You're not gonna believe it
 But things get deeper as the story goes on
 Next thing you know, a call comes through on my cell phone
 I tried my best to quickly put it on vibrate
 But from the way he act, I could tell it was too late
 He hopped up and said, "There's a mystery going on
 And I'm gonna solve it"
 And I'm like, "God please, don't let this man open this closet
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: Relaxer on July 11, 2005, 09:22:00 am
Quote
Originally posted by Hello, My Name is Chaz:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Relaxer:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Fine French Chaz:
  In terms of sheer influence, I'll take Skynard any day.
 
 USA kicks ass!
The Beatles are the most influential pop group of all time and to deny that is to either deny reality or to not understand what music was before and after the Beatles. What did Skynyrd contribute to rock and roll that no other band did? If Skynrd never existed, how is the musical world any different? They were a fine band who produced some fine songs and albums, but the Beatles' music literally changed how half the world listens to and appreciates music, and that was just while they were still an existing band. Not even Elvis was as influential as the Beatles, since he never wrote a song in his life.
 
  [/b]
Dude any southern rock band...Allmans, Skynyrd, Molly Hatchett beats any of that wussy brit rock anyday.  USA RULES, got it? [/b]
You spelled Molly Hatchet wrong.
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: mike9182 on July 11, 2005, 09:23:00 am
Beatlemania? yes
 Skynardmania? ?
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: chaz on July 11, 2005, 09:24:00 am
Quote
Originally posted by Relaxer:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Hello, My Name is Chaz:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Relaxer:
     
Quote
Originally posted by Fine French Chaz:
  In terms of sheer influence, I'll take Skynard any day.
 
 USA kicks ass!
The Beatles are the most influential pop group of all time and to deny that is to either deny reality or to not understand what music was before and after the Beatles. What did Skynyrd contribute to rock and roll that no other band did? If Skynrd never existed, how is the musical world any different? They were a fine band who produced some fine songs and albums, but the Beatles' music literally changed how half the world listens to and appreciates music, and that was just while they were still an existing band. Not even Elvis was as influential as the Beatles, since he never wrote a song in his life.
 
  [/b]
Dude any southern rock band...Allmans, Skynyrd, Molly Hatchett beats any of that wussy brit rock anyday.  USA RULES, got it? [/b]
You spelled Molly Hatchet wrong. [/b]
You don't spell it dude, you rock out to it!
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: on July 11, 2005, 11:34:00 am
FREEBIRD! (http://poststuff2.entensity.net/070605/media.php?media=flybird.wmv)
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: sonickteam2 on July 11, 2005, 12:30:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Relaxer:
 
 Hell, you can't even spell their name right. How much of a fan could you be?
 
when i worked at a record store, it was always amazing to help people find Skynyrd CDs.  people would be all over the L's.  Ly to Le to Li and everything in between.
 
   one guy was actually looking in the S's like it was some guy named Leonard Skinnard and we had it by his last name!!
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: vansmack on July 11, 2005, 01:08:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by sonickteam4:
   one guy was actually looking in the S's like it was some guy named Leonard Skinnard and we had it by his last name!!
Maybe he was that guys PE teacher too.
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer on July 11, 2005, 01:12:00 pm
Real Skynrd fans buy their Skynrd stuff on 8 track or cassette at highway truck stops.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by sonickteam4:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Relaxer:
 
 Hell, you can't even spell their name right. How much of a fan could you be?
 
when i worked at a record store, it was always amazing to help people find Skynyrd CDs.  people would be all over the L's.  Ly to Le to Li and everything in between.
 
   one guy was actually looking in the S's like it was some guy named Leonard Skinnard and we had it by his last name!! [/b]
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: Jaguär on July 11, 2005, 07:50:00 pm
Now we know who all of those fools are hollering out "FREEBIRDDDD".     :roll:    
 
 My choice would be a very close tie between the Beatles and the Stones, probably with the Beatles just edging out the Stones. Early Beatles, that is.
 
 I fucking HATE Lynard Skynard....however they spell it!!!! Always have and always will. In fact, I hate them more than Rap or Hip Hop. At least I've heard several Rap or Hip Hop songs that I've actually really liked. That's never, ever happened to me with a Skynard song. Worse yet, I hate them even more than Sleater Kinney. Much, much more....and that's saying something.
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: BLACKSTORM on July 11, 2005, 11:42:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Jaguär:
 [QB]
 I fucking HATE Lynard Skynard....however they spell it!!!! Always have and always will. In fact, I hate them more than Rap or Hip Hop. At least I've heard several Rap or Hip Hop songs that I've actually really liked. That's never, ever happened to me with a Skynard song. .
 
 
 Jaguar, you took the words right out of my mouth. Lynard Skynard is 100% without a doubt Shit.
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: evilizac on July 12, 2005, 05:01:00 pm
Fuck!!! I tried to resist this post but it kept drawing me back in.
 The Beatles without a doubt always manage to amaze me. When I forget about how thrilling  their work is it alway hits me with one listen. It's shows what happens when you let a band evolve. They made beautiful rock music and not without some edge.
 The Stones made rock and roll into what it is when it comes to a live sense as well as earthy, bluesy, often gritty. Check out the video "Ladies and Gentlemen The Rolling Stones" from 1973. Rock!!!
Title: Re: Beatles, Stones or Skynard?
Post by: myuman on July 12, 2005, 08:25:00 pm
Skynard = Nascar; just because a few bandana toting individuals with confed. flagged draped pickups came into Tower records and inquired about a few skynard albums does not put them into the Beatles/stones class.  And I couldn't care less about the beatles or the stones... but skynard? Dale Jr.?  Come on... hype is nothing but that.