930 Forums

=> GENERAL DISCUSSION => Topic started by: brennser on June 22, 2004, 09:45:00 am

Title: bad pitchfork, bad!!
Post by: brennser on June 22, 2004, 09:45:00 am

ooooooh (http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/)

Title: Re: bad pitchfork, bad!!
Post by: Got Haggis? on June 22, 2004, 09:53:00 am

they forgot to break out the thesaurus for that bit of 'news'.

Title: Re: bad pitchfork, bad!!
Post by: loopzlp on June 22, 2004, 09:55:00 am

so will they re-review the album and give it higher marks as an appeasement?  did anyone actually read the original un-retracted review...I only got to read the retracted one, on tuesday afternoon so you'd have to have read it early tuesday morning...why was he talking re: radiohead?

Title: Re: bad pitchfork, bad!!
Post by: Random Citizen on June 22, 2004, 10:53:00 am

Original review (http://www.esselle.org/blog/lepage/fullpitch.html)

Title: Re: bad pitchfork, bad!!
Post by: loopzlp on June 22, 2004, 11:25:00 am

thanks for the link...

Title: Re: bad pitchfork, bad!!
Post by: on June 22, 2004, 12:43:00 pm

<img src="http://www.sillygirl.com/images/sillypictures/dangerboy/american_gothic.jpg" alt=" - " />

Title: Re: bad pitchfork, bad!!
Post by: MET on June 22, 2004, 01:52:00 pm

I'm glad that review got pulled.  I'd like to hear about the record, not how cool the reviewer thinks he is.