930 Forums

=> GENERAL DISCUSSION => Topic started by: sacriforce on November 07, 2005, 01:38:00 pm

Title: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: sacriforce on November 07, 2005, 01:38:00 pm
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,17162341-13762,00.html (http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,17162341-13762,00.html)
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: godsshoeshine on November 07, 2005, 02:18:00 pm
so now that there (most likely) will be 5 of 9 catholic judges, does that mean that intelligent design is fucked in the court?
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: on November 07, 2005, 02:31:00 pm
It just goes to prove that Catholics don't ever claim that God talks directly to them, unlike many of the Protestant denominations("Jesus told me to invade Iraq").
   <img src="http://www.trimpe.org/jr/pictures/walrus-approves.jpg" alt=" - " />
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: sacriforce on November 07, 2005, 03:43:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by The Walrus:
  It just goes to prove that Catholics don't ever claim that God talks directly to them, unlike many of the Protestant denominations("Jesus told me to invade Iraq").
    <img src="http://www.trimpe.org/jr/pictures/walrus-approves.jpg" alt=" - " />
or at the very least they're a pube's width more rational than baptists etc
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: on November 07, 2005, 03:47:00 pm
Jimmy Carter (http://myspace.com/sexyfitsum) is my hero, too.  Go figure..?
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: sacriforce on November 07, 2005, 05:56:00 pm
very productive post-presidency. genuine humanitarian.
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: ggw on November 07, 2005, 06:04:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by _Sexy Fitsum_:
  very productive post-presidency. genuine humanitarian.
One of only two presidents to have received a lower approval rating than W.
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: on November 07, 2005, 06:18:00 pm
Would W have flown to the control room of Three Mile Island when the reactor's situation was critical to reassure the staff & community?
 
            <img src="http://www.trimpe.org/jr/pictures/walrus-says-no.jpg" alt=" - " />
 
 Every time I see W involved with a genuine national crisis he's either running the other way in a hurry after dropping his copy of My Pet Goat, or he shows up about two weeks late and only stays long enough for a quick overflight & hand-shake/photo-op.
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: Barcelona on November 07, 2005, 06:21:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  One of only two presidents to have received a lower approval rating than W.
yet you still support W.
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: on November 07, 2005, 06:29:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Barcelona:
       
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  One of only two presidents to have received a lower approval rating than W.
yet you still support W. [/b]
You'd think ggw would like Carter more?  After all, Jimmy wanted to legalize marijuana, even though he didn't smoke it himself...unlike W.
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: Herr Professor Doktor Doom on November 07, 2005, 08:16:00 pm
Flying to the control room of a nuclear reactor was a dumb stunt.  It convinced people that TMI was a far bigger crisis than it actually was and scared the bejeesus out of everyone.
 
 Carter has done good things since his presidency.  But as a President, he sucked.
 
 As for the Catholics... for the most part they seem more reasonable than Evangelical Protestants (pretty much everyone does) but then remember that they do silly things like ban the DaVinci Code and forbid contraception....
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: on November 07, 2005, 11:17:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Doctor Doom:
  Flying to the control room of a nuclear reactor was a dumb stunt.  It convinced people that TMI was a far bigger crisis than it actually was and scared the bejeesus out of everyone.
Despite flirting with good taste in music via your purchase of a Steely Dan album, Dr. Gloom, you're quite the 'Dim Bulb'.  I find it difficult to comprehend, what with your total ignorance of historical record, that you managed to secure such a cushy position working for the federal government?
 
 I'd hardly call a core meltdown a small crisis.  In actuality Carter's move calmed everyone.
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: Herr Professor Doktor Doom on November 08, 2005, 06:23:00 am
Quote
Originally posted by The Walrus:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Doctor Doom:
  Flying to the control room of a nuclear reactor was a dumb stunt.  It convinced people that TMI was a far bigger crisis than it actually was and scared the bejeesus out of everyone.
Despite flirting with good taste in music via your purchase of a Steely Dan album, Dr. Gloom, you're quite the 'Dim Bulb'.  I find it difficult to comprehend, what with your total ignorance of historical record, that you managed to secure such a cushy position working for the federal government?
 
 I'd hardly call a core meltdown a small crisis.  In actuality Carter's move calmed everyone. [/b]
Wow, that's really insightful of you. You must be smart.  I especially am impressed by the way you backed up your opinion with facts!
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: chaz on November 08, 2005, 09:29:00 am
nothing to see here.
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: kosmo vinyl on November 08, 2005, 09:43:00 am
uh your confusing ggw and rob_gee
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: chaz on November 08, 2005, 09:56:00 am
Quote
Originally posted by kosmo vinyl:
  uh your confusing ggw and rob_gee
Shit yer right...sorry folks...nothing to see here just move along!
 Thanks Kosmo.
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: on November 08, 2005, 12:33:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Doctor Doom:
   
Quote
Originally posted by The Walrus:
     
Quote
Originally posted by Doctor Doom:
  Flying to the control room of a nuclear reactor was a dumb stunt.  It convinced people that TMI was a far bigger crisis than it actually was and scared the bejeesus out of everyone.
Despite flirting with good taste in music via your purchase of a Steely Dan album, Dr. Gloom, you're quite the 'Dim Bulb'.  I find it difficult to comprehend, what with your total ignorance of historical record, that you managed to secure such a cushy position working for the federal government?
 
 I'd hardly call a core meltdown a small crisis.  In actuality Carter's move calmed everyone. [/b]
Wow, that's really insightful of you. You must be smart.  I especially am impressed by the way you backed up your opinion with facts! [/b]
Um, it's a matter of historical record. Maybe you should consider looking into matters you espouse beforehand, otherwise you're liable to posit your usual threadbare commentary and be made the fool again..?
 
   <img src="http://www.forumspile.com/Retard-Stage.jpg" alt=" - " />
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: Herr Professor Doktor Doom on November 08, 2005, 02:03:00 pm
heh... dude, you're a winner!      :D  
 
 ps, since you're blabbing on about historical records, maybe you ought to look up the fact that TMI never actually did fully melt down.  It was just panicked morons like yourself who thought it did.
 
 Or perhaps you can just go on feeling like a winner.   :D
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: ggw on November 08, 2005, 02:09:00 pm
Three Mile Island is the location of a U.S. nuclear power station that, on March 28, 1979, suffered a partial core meltdown.
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Mile_Island (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Mile_Island)
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: on November 08, 2005, 02:11:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by Doctor Doom:
  heh... dude, you're a winner!       :D  
 
 ps, since you're blabbing on about historical records, maybe you ought to look up the fact that TMI never actually did fully melt down.  It was just panicked morons like yourself who thought it did.
 
 Or perhaps you can just go on feeling like a winner.    :D  
Why are you a moron?
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: ggw on November 08, 2005, 02:12:00 pm
Nice edit.
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: Herr Professor Doktor Doom on November 08, 2005, 02:13:00 pm
this is dumb.  Why am I arguing with net losers about the extent of a meltdown?  That's the end of it from me.
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: on November 08, 2005, 02:27:00 pm
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  Nice edit.
You "Net Loser", you!
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: HoyaSaxa03 on November 08, 2005, 04:45:00 pm
there was a really good documentary on PBS (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/three/) about three mile island ... really captured the hysteria of the moment
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: on November 08, 2005, 04:51:00 pm
Dick
  Cheney
  likes
 it (http://www.nader.org/interest/050101.html).
 
 What is it?
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: Got Haggis? on November 09, 2005, 09:38:00 am
it's it.
Title: Re: Vatican criticizes "intelligent design"/defend
Post by: on November 25, 2005, 09:38:00 am
Give 'em hell (http://www.crooksandliars.com/2005/11/23.html#a6027), Jimmy.