930 Forums

=> GENERAL DISCUSSION => Topic started by: atomicfront on August 20, 2013, 03:29:10 pm

Title: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: atomicfront on August 20, 2013, 03:29:10 pm
Lena Dunham

(http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2013/01/11/arts/11GIRLS_SPAN/11GIRLS-articleLarge.jpg)
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: hutch on August 20, 2013, 05:11:55 pm
no way
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: atomicfront on August 20, 2013, 05:59:24 pm
I think I would.  Not much in juggs but she is the best looking chick on "girls" and she appears to be an always nude.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: James Ford on August 20, 2013, 10:00:20 pm
I don't watch that show, but my wife does. She says:

"He's an idiot. She's the worst looking chick on that show, by far."

I think I would.  Not much in juggs but she is the best looking chick on "girls" and she appears to be an always nude.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: i am gay and i like cats on August 20, 2013, 10:21:45 pm
that was your reply to this thread mister front?  this is my reply.


(http://a.pix.ge/g/4fg0t.jpg)
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: atomicfront on August 20, 2013, 10:48:51 pm
I don't watch that show, but my wife does. She says:

"He's an idiot. She's the worst looking chick on that show, by far."

I think I would.  Not much in juggs but she is the best looking chick on "girls" and she appears to be an always nude.

Really you are using your wife to tell me quick chick is attractive?  Your wife is an idiot.for supposing to know what I should be attracted to.  All the other girls on that show have bodies like 14 year old boys. 
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: killsaly on August 20, 2013, 10:56:56 pm
Why would someone's attraction to someone else make them an idiot?
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Thousand Made-Up Loves on August 20, 2013, 11:24:44 pm
Absolutely fucking not. In fact, I'd pay her $20 to shut the fuck up.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Thousand Made-Up Loves on August 20, 2013, 11:25:09 pm
I think I would.  Not much in juggs but she is the best looking chick on "girls" and she appears to be an always nude.

Exhibit A why I'll never live in NY.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: imbecile on August 21, 2013, 08:06:43 am
I think I would.  Not much in juggs but she is the best looking chick on "girls" and she appears to be an always nude.

I think I maybe agree with  you, as her being the best looking girl on the show.  The girl from Mad Men and the British chick are non-starters in this debate because they're just bizarre looking and annoying as fuck.  Which brings it down to Marnie (the plastic) and whatever this girls name is (the chubbs).  It's certainly a matter of choosing the lesser of two evils here, the plastic is classicly very pretty, but is such a vacant hole that it's hard to overlook that.  Whereas this chick is a complete clusterfuck, but she atleast seems entertaining.. and the sex would be better.  Chubbs by a nose.

That aside, everyone that says that Girls is like Sex in the City (i've never seen Sex in the City), but with characters who are more like real people, needs to hang out with more real people.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Yada on August 21, 2013, 08:59:54 am
If you'd bang Lena Dunham, you must bang anything that walks.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: James Ford on August 21, 2013, 09:05:50 am
This thread is demeaning toward women and could have only been started by a pimply 15 year old boy, or a creepy 50 year old middle aged loser.

That said, my wife said the British chick doesn't have a body of a 14 year old girl, and that "I'm 41 and struggling, and i look better than any of the girls on that show. Any men who would want one of those girls just likes the insecure, wimpy type of 20something girl the show is portraying."

And speaking as a creepy 50 year old middle aged loser, who cares what type of personality they have? If I'm going to hypothetically "hit it" (and i'm realistically not, because I'm a married 46 yr old guy trying my best to be a decent husband), I'm basing it 100% on looks. Now my standards for looks have definitely dropped with age, but no way am I going to hit that Lena Dunham chick. Ever. Even if she has the most amazing personality and fucks like a screaming bonobo.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: atomicfront on August 21, 2013, 09:32:34 am
This thread is demeaning toward women and could have only been started by a pimply 15 year old boy, or a creepy 50 year old middle aged loser.

That said, my wife said the British chick doesn't have a body of a 14 year old girl, and that "I'm 41 and struggling, and i look better than any of the girls on that show. Any men who would want one of those girls just likes the insecure, wimpy type of 20something girl the show is portraying."

And speaking as a creepy 50 year old middle aged loser, who cares what type of personality they have? If I'm going to hypothetically "hit it" (and i'm realistically not, because I'm a married 46 yr old guy trying my best to be a decent husband), I'm basing it 100% on looks. Now my standards for looks have definitely dropped with age, but no way am I going to hit that Lena Dunham chick. Ever. Even if she has the most amazing personality and fucks like a screaming bonobo.

Your wife has to get a dose of reality. I do not find 41 year old women hot.  I don't even think your wife has said these things.  They are ridiculous.  It is like me arguing with some woman about some man she thinks is hot.  It would only make me look insecure and pathetic

As for the threads they are about women who are not convetionally attractive and whether you find them attractive despite their faults. 
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: atomicfront on August 21, 2013, 09:34:28 am
If you'd bang Lena Dunham, you must bang anything that walks.

Not true at all.  I am sure there are tons of girls you would hit that I wouldn't. 
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: DeathFromAbove1979 on August 21, 2013, 09:40:04 am
Nope.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: James Ford on August 21, 2013, 09:47:06 am
I dig women with hairy pits (and don't see that as a "fault"). I think that speaks to the issue of unconventional beauty.

And why wouldn't my wife's comments on the sexual attractiveness of a woman be as valid as yours?


This thread is demeaning toward women and could have only been started by a pimply 15 year old boy, or a creepy 50 year old middle aged loser.

That said, my wife said the British chick doesn't have a body of a 14 year old girl, and that "I'm 41 and struggling, and i look better than any of the girls on that show. Any men who would want one of those girls just likes the insecure, wimpy type of 20something girl the show is portraying."

And speaking as a creepy 50 year old middle aged loser, who cares what type of personality they have? If I'm going to hypothetically "hit it" (and i'm realistically not, because I'm a married 46 yr old guy trying my best to be a decent husband), I'm basing it 100% on looks. Now my standards for looks have definitely dropped with age, but no way am I going to hit that Lena Dunham chick. Ever. Even if she has the most amazing personality and fucks like a screaming bonobo.

Your wife has to get a dose of reality. I do not find 41 year old women hot.  I don't even think your wife has said these things.  They are ridiculous.  It is like me arguing with some woman about some man she thinks is hot.  It would only make me look insecure and pathetic

As for the threads they are about women who are not convetionally attractive and whether you find them attractive despite their faults. 
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: shemptiness on August 21, 2013, 09:47:31 am
This guy would:

(http://www.billboard.com/files/styles/promo_650/public/media/fun-jack-antonoff-650-430.jpg)
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Yada on August 21, 2013, 09:49:29 am
This guy would:

(http://www.billboard.com/files/styles/promo_650/public/media/fun-jack-antonoff-650-430.jpg)

Pretty sure he's gay, too.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: atomicfront on August 21, 2013, 09:49:43 am
I dig women with hairy pits (and don't see that as a "fault"). I think that speaks to the issue of unconventional beauty.

And why wouldn't my wife's comments on the sexual attractiveness of a woman be as valid as yours?


This thread is demeaning toward women and could have only been started by a pimply 15 year old boy, or a creepy 50 year old middle aged loser.

That said, my wife said the British chick doesn't have a body of a 14 year old girl, and that "I'm 41 and struggling, and i look better than any of the girls on that show. Any men who would want one of those girls just likes the insecure, wimpy type of 20something girl the show is portraying."

And speaking as a creepy 50 year old middle aged loser, who cares what type of personality they have? If I'm going to hypothetically "hit it" (and i'm realistically not, because I'm a married 46 yr old guy trying my best to be a decent husband), I'm basing it 100% on looks. Now my standards for looks have definitely dropped with age, but no way am I going to hit that Lena Dunham chick. Ever. Even if she has the most amazing personality and fucks like a screaming bonobo.

Your wife has to get a dose of reality. I do not find 41 year old women hot.  I don't even think your wife has said these things.  They are ridiculous.  It is like me arguing with some woman about some man she thinks is hot.  It would only make me look insecure and pathetic

As for the threads they are about women who are not convetionally attractive and whether you find them attractive despite their faults. 

No they aren't valid at all.  Women think Sara Jessica Parker is attractive.   I have never found a guy who found her attractive.

A friend of mine's chick said Jason Statham was hot.  I didn't tell her he is ugly and she is stupid.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: James Ford on August 21, 2013, 11:56:43 am
I'd hit Jason Statham before I'd hit Lena Dunham. She's not unconventionally attractive, she's just ugly.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: chaz on August 21, 2013, 12:10:03 pm
I've never seen this show or laid eyes on any of these women (to the best of my knowledge) until i google imaged "cast of girls".  The chubby one is the last one I'd choose to get with, by a wide margin.

(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/01/10/article-2260433-16DD3CC8000005DC-238_634x412.jpg)
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: atomicfront on August 21, 2013, 12:11:29 pm
I've never seen this show or laid eyes on any of these women (to the best of my knowledge) until i google imaged "cast of girls".  The chubby one is the last one I'd choose to get with, by a wide margin.

(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/01/10/article-2260433-16DD3CC8000005DC-238_634x412.jpg)

That is just a good image of the other girls and a bad image of the other girl. Trust me they don't look like that on the show.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: atomicfront on August 21, 2013, 12:13:07 pm
For example:

(http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1207423/thumbs/o-ZOSIA-MAMET-PANTSLESS-570.jpg?15)
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: James Ford on August 21, 2013, 12:40:50 pm
I'll take the one in green, thanks. And the other two over Lena.

The one on the right is the daughter of NBC news anchor Brian Williams, right?
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: kosmo vinyl on August 21, 2013, 07:39:00 pm
Correct James..
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: slappy on August 22, 2013, 04:27:32 pm
I'll take the one in green, thanks. And the other two over Lena.

The one on the right is the daughter of NBC news anchor Brian Williams, right?

I doubt it in reality.
I'd bet she's too crazy for you.
You'd lose interest when she told you her name is Jemima.
And she's way into hip hop right down to being removed from Jay Z's arty farty thing for clinging on to him too long.
(http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1419859!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_635/article-kircke0807-4.jpg)

But here she is topless for a Vice shoot and generic wacky interview.
http://www.vice.com/read/one-in-the-oven-0000310-v19n10-girls-jemima-kirke (http://www.vice.com/read/one-in-the-oven-0000310-v19n10-girls-jemima-kirke)
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: kosmo vinyl on August 22, 2013, 04:48:55 pm
Seriously once Lena's 3.7 million dollar book deal goes south, her career is over.  The show was unbearable to watch, once Chris o'Dowd left it.  She can only play herself and now her "character" on Girls has gone batshit crazy.  A feeble attempt to save a series full of hipster bucket list exploits.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: vansmack on August 22, 2013, 04:57:25 pm
I'd definitely hit the green and the white, would have to see them in person to have a preferred order.

Probably would take a pass on the other two.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: i am gay and i like cats on August 22, 2013, 04:59:41 pm
do you think that women enjoy being looked at and judged as things to be hit.  odd.  straight men are odd.  men are odd, as well.  i do enjoy the fact that certain forces in this world control men through something so simple as sex.  they can be made to do almost anything for it . . . trust me.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: vansmack on August 22, 2013, 05:14:35 pm
Probably about as much as I enjoy talking about my "feelings" but that doesn't stop them from asking either.  Of course I oblige when I want sex though...
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: i am gay and i like cats on August 22, 2013, 05:28:29 pm
thank you
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: atomic on August 28, 2013, 04:46:30 pm
do you think that women enjoy being looked at and judged as things to be hit.  odd.  straight men are odd.  men are odd, as well.  i do enjoy the fact that certain forces in this world control men through something so simple as sex.  they can be made to do almost anything for it . . . trust me.

I think that a woman who produces and directs her own show where she is nude more often than she is clothed enjoys being looked at judged as being a thing to procreate with. And straight men are weird?  When I was under 30 I got hit on by gay men constantly.  Once I hit 30 they stopped.   I am guessing gay men are at least as shallow as straight men.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Ardamus on August 28, 2013, 08:14:02 pm
Lena Dunham

(http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2013/01/11/arts/11GIRLS_SPAN/11GIRLS-articleLarge.jpg)

ah, what the hell.....i beat it up. as long as she doesn't cut her hair short and still keep that ass like it is. we're all good.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: sweetcell on August 29, 2013, 04:05:55 am
I think

false.

that a woman who produces and directs her own show where she is nude more often than she is clothed enjoys being looked at judged as being a thing to procreate with.

or, maybe, you know, she just likes being nude.  or she isn't all hung up about it - we spend some of our time without clothes on in the real world, but not on puritan TV (how many women do you know who tuck the bed sheet under their armpits all the time like they do on TV? this woman is just keepsing it real).  or she doesn't think that being without clothes is an invitation to sex. 

When I was under 30 I got hit on by gay men constantly.  Once I hit 30 they stopped.   I am guessing gay men are at least as shallow as straight men.

or maybe you started looking like hell when you hit 30. if so, i can only imagine what kind of a mess you are now in your 40's (or is it 50's?).

i really need to update my blocking script... but for the moment i'm enjoying your idiocy again.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Yada on August 29, 2013, 08:43:04 am
I unfortunately can't keep track of who's who around here?

Wha happened?
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: kosmo vinyl on August 29, 2013, 08:56:43 am
Stevewizzle under went a screen name change in honor if Bradley Manning.  I believe DFA got in touch with his 70s sitcom side
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: James Ford on August 29, 2013, 09:17:59 am
You're a pathetic piece of shit. What makes you think that she'd want you to "beat it up"?

Lena Dunham

(http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2013/01/11/arts/11GIRLS_SPAN/11GIRLS-articleLarge.jpg)

ah, what the hell.....i beat it up. as long as she doesn't cut her hair short and still keep that ass like it is. we're all good.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Yada on August 29, 2013, 09:20:26 am
You're a pathetic piece of shit. What makes you think that she'd want you to "beat it up"?

Lena Dunham

(http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2013/01/11/arts/11GIRLS_SPAN/11GIRLS-articleLarge.jpg)

ah, what the hell.....i beat it up. as long as she doesn't cut her hair short and still keep that ass like it is. we're all good.

The title of the thread was, "would you hit it?" Beatin' it up and hittin' it are pretty similar.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: James Ford on August 29, 2013, 09:33:12 am
Well i thought it went witout saying that the person who strated it was a pathetic piece of shit.

I wouldn't have a problem with "Do you find her sexually attractive and would you fuck her if she wanted to fuck you?"

The other two phrases a totally misogynistic. And the way they phrase it, as if it's automatically assumed that she's going to want to fuck them, like they're doing her some kind of favor, is what's most pathetic.

You're a pathetic piece of shit. What makes you think that she'd want you to "beat it up"?

Lena Dunham

(http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2013/01/11/arts/11GIRLS_SPAN/11GIRLS-articleLarge.jpg)

ah, what the hell.....i beat it up. as long as she doesn't cut her hair short and still keep that ass like it is. we're all good.

The title of the thread was, "would you hit it?" Beatin' it up and hittin' it are pretty similar.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: atomic on August 29, 2013, 09:43:18 am
Well i thought it went witout saying that the person who strated it was a pathetic piece of shit.

I wouldn't have a problem with "Do you find her sexually attractive and would you fuck her if she wanted to fuck you?"

The other two phrases a totally misogynistic. And the way they phrase it, as if it's automatically assumed that she's going to want to fuck them, like they're doing her some kind of favor, is what's most pathetic.

You're a pathetic piece of shit. What makes you think that she'd want you to "beat it up"?

Lena Dunham

(http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2013/01/11/arts/11GIRLS_SPAN/11GIRLS-articleLarge.jpg)

ah, what the hell.....i beat it up. as long as she doesn't cut her hair short and still keep that ass like it is. we're all good.

The title of the thread was, "would you hit it?" Beatin' it up and hittin' it are pretty similar.

No one assume any celebrity would do any of us on here.  You are the one who is throwing personal attacks on here so who is pathetic.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: atomic on August 29, 2013, 09:47:18 am
I think

false.

that a woman who produces and directs her own show where she is nude more often than she is clothed enjoys being looked at judged as being a thing to procreate with.

or, maybe, you know, she just likes being nude.  or she isn't all hung up about it - we spend some of our time without clothes on in the real world, but not on puritan TV (how many women do you know who tuck the bed sheet under their armpits all the time like they do on TV? this woman is just keepsing it real).  or she doesn't think that being without clothes is an invitation to sex. 

When I was under 30 I got hit on by gay men constantly.  Once I hit 30 they stopped.   I am guessing gay men are at least as shallow as straight men.

or maybe you started looking like hell when you hit 30. if so, i can only imagine what kind of a mess you are now in your 40's (or is it 50's?).

i really need to update my blocking script... but for the moment i'm enjoying your idiocy again.

I still get hit on by attractive girls in their early 20's when I go out.  I might have started looking like shit in your opinion when I got to my 30's.  But perhaps women don't only look at physical appearance.  Well perhaps they look at a tall muscular guy with blonde hair who istylish and they don't notice the other stuff.    But I am guessing I look better than a lot of people on here with the food they eat.  Hot wings and Bacon is going to make you look like shit.  Looking back at people I knew when I was 18 there is no corelation between how you looked at 18 and how you looked at 45.  It is how you treat your body. 
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: wml7 on August 29, 2013, 10:34:23 am
Atomic
 ;D
(http://fanclub.dogthebountyhunter.com/images/news/dogart.jpg)
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: slappy on August 29, 2013, 10:46:29 am
But you said you'll take the one in green, like you're doing her some kind of favor.
Sounds like today JF thinks last week JF is pathetic.

The other two phrases a totally misogynistic. And the way they phrase it, as if it's automatically assumed that she's going to want to fuck them, like they're doing her some kind of favor, is what's most pathetic.

I'll take the one in green, thanks. And the other two over Lena.

The one on the right is the daughter of NBC news anchor Brian Williams, right?
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: atomic on August 29, 2013, 11:30:57 am
But you said you'll take the one in green, like you're doing her some kind of favor.
Sounds like today JF thinks last week JF is pathetic.

The other two phrases a totally misogynistic. And the way they phrase it, as if it's automatically assumed that she's going to want to fuck them, like they're doing her some kind of favor, is what's most pathetic.

I'll take the one in green, thanks. And the other two over Lena.

The one on the right is the daughter of NBC news anchor Brian Williams, right?


His wife had a talk with him about his post. 
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: James Ford on August 29, 2013, 11:35:49 am
There's a difference between  "I want to take you home tonight and fuck your brains out." as opposed to "innocently flirting with a middle aged man who has no shot at me."

It's funny how you don't seem to get the difference.


I think

false.

that a woman who produces and directs her own show where she is nude more often than she is clothed enjoys being looked at judged as being a thing to procreate with.

or, maybe, you know, she just likes being nude.  or she isn't all hung up about it - we spend some of our time without clothes on in the real world, but not on puritan TV (how many women do you know who tuck the bed sheet under their armpits all the time like they do on TV? this woman is just keepsing it real).  or she doesn't think that being without clothes is an invitation to sex. 

When I was under 30 I got hit on by gay men constantly.  Once I hit 30 they stopped.   I am guessing gay men are at least as shallow as straight men.

or maybe you started looking like hell when you hit 30. if so, i can only imagine what kind of a mess you are now in your 40's (or is it 50's?).

i really need to update my blocking script... but for the moment i'm enjoying your idiocy again.

I still get hit on by attractive girls in their early 20's when I go out.  I might have started looking like shit in your opinion when I got to my 30's.  But perhaps women don't only look at physical appearance.  Well perhaps they look at a tall muscular guy with blonde hair who istylish and they don't notice the other stuff.    But I am guessing I look better than a lot of people on here with the food they eat.  Hot wings and Bacon is going to make you look like shit.  Looking back at people I knew when I was 18 there is no corelation between how you looked at 18 and how you looked at 45.  It is how you treat your body. 
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: James Ford on August 29, 2013, 11:38:46 am
I'd take her if she'd have me, if I were single, which I previously stated that I was not.

But you said you'll take the one in green, like you're doing her some kind of favor.
Sounds like today JF thinks last week JF is pathetic.

The other two phrases a totally misogynistic. And the way they phrase it, as if it's automatically assumed that she's going to want to fuck them, like they're doing her some kind of favor, is what's most pathetic.

I'll take the one in green, thanks. And the other two over Lena.

The one on the right is the daughter of NBC news anchor Brian Williams, right?
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: atomic on August 29, 2013, 11:42:26 am
You also told me I was an idiot for finding a woman attractive.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: James Ford on August 29, 2013, 12:00:51 pm
Actually, it was my wife who said you were an idiot (and i quoted it that way), and she said in in response to you PREFERRING Lena to the others.

I happen to agree with her that Lena is the least attractive of the four. I think it's another example of your bad taste, but i don't think that bad taste in women makes you an idiot like bad taste in beer does  ;)

Hence, I wouldn't call you an idiot for preferring her.

Wow, i can't believe i took the time to type that.
You also told me I was an idiot for finding a woman attractive.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: grateful on August 29, 2013, 12:21:40 pm
Wow, i can't believe i took the time to type that.

and I to read that.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: i am gay and i like cats on August 29, 2013, 12:25:55 pm
and i not knowing anything about what you are talking about.  i grew bored of this thread, and just now glance at thinigs.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: atomic on August 29, 2013, 12:55:47 pm
and i not knowing anything about what you are talking about.  i grew bored of this thread, and just now glance at thinigs.

We will a dude next to make things more.interesting.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: i am gay and i like cats on August 29, 2013, 12:58:38 pm
see . . . you did it, again.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: atomic on August 29, 2013, 01:14:32 pm
see . . . you did it, again.

Using a phone and I hit period by mistake.....Not trying to steal your thunder.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: atomic on August 29, 2013, 01:47:01 pm
Actually, it was my wife who said you were an idiot (and i quoted it that way), and she said in in response to you PREFERRING Lena to the others.

I happen to agree with her that Lena is the least attractive of the four. I think it's another example of your bad taste, but i don't think that bad taste in women makes you an idiot like bad taste in beer does  ;)

Hence, I wouldn't call you an idiot for preferring her.

Wow, i can't believe i took the time to type that.
You also told me I was an idiot for finding a woman attractive.

How could it be bad taste to find someone attractive.  And you just ranked the chicks on the show by the way they look.  Does that make you creepy or pathetic?  I forget which one you stated.


It isn't bad taste to like beer that you like because of the way it tastes.  And my favorite beers don't use a bunch of adjuncts like the american beers you prefer.  So they are probably healthier.  And this is my own opinion.  I am not using someone else's opinion to tell me what beers to like.  That would be idiotic.  People on that site are all sheep.  I read a review of one Heifweizen on there and they were all talking about the orange peel and corriander flavors they tasted.  Yeah too bad it doesn't have any of those flavors in it. 
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: ggw on August 29, 2013, 01:48:17 pm
Visible tattoos = ugly
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: i am gay and i like cats on August 29, 2013, 01:57:05 pm
see . . . you did it, again.

Using a phone and I hit period by mistake.....Not trying to steal your thunder.

oh ok.  whew.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Relaxer on August 29, 2013, 03:28:35 pm
Here you guys go, and you don't even have to rape her.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/28/ania-lisewska_n_3831495.html (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/28/ania-lisewska_n_3831495.html)

(http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1323849/thumbs/s-ANIA-LISEWSKA-large.jpg?6)
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: atomic on August 29, 2013, 03:34:16 pm
Here you guys go, and you don't even have to rape her.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/28/ania-lisewska_n_3831495.html (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/28/ania-lisewska_n_3831495.html)

(http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1323849/thumbs/s-ANIA-LISEWSKA-large.jpg?6)

Gross. 
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Yada on May 29, 2015, 11:35:27 am
(http://img.s-msn.com/tenant/amp/entityid/BBkfX4e.img?h=768&w=1366&m=6&q=60&o=f&l=f)
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Julian, Forum COGNOSCENTI on May 29, 2015, 11:41:03 am
(http://img.s-msn.com/tenant/amp/entityid/BBkfX4e.img?h=768&w=1366&m=6&q=60&o=f&l=f)
No way, Jose.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Julian, Forum COGNOSCENTI on May 29, 2015, 11:42:39 am
I think I would.  Not much in juggs but she is the best looking chick on "girls" and she appears to be an always nude.
I missed this the first time around and am just seeing this. Perhaps the most superlative example of atomic trolling: absolutely no one on Earth thinks Lena Dunham is the hottest of the main 4 female characters on Girls. Including Atomic.

Allison Williams is gorgeous.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Yada on May 29, 2015, 11:45:23 am
I think I would.  Not much in juggs but she is the best looking chick on "girls" and she appears to be an always nude.
I missed this the first time around and am just seeing this. Perhaps the most superlative example of atomic trolling: absolutely no one on Earth thinks Lena Dunham is the hottest of the main 4 female characters on Girls. Including Atomic.

Allison Williams is gorgeous.

I find each of the characters other than Lena attractive in some way.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Julian, Forum COGNOSCENTI on May 29, 2015, 11:46:24 am
I find each of the characters other than Lena attractive in some way.
I'll agree with that. I'm a lot higher on Zosia Mamet than most people seem to be. I think she'll probably have the best career of any of them, honestly.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: ye-ole-hatch ıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llıl on May 29, 2015, 11:47:43 am
I find each of the characters other than Lena attractive in some way.
I'll agree with that. I'm a lot higher on Zosia Mamet than most people seem to be. I think she'll probably have the best career of any of them, honestly.
loved her in MadMen
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Julian, Forum COGNOSCENTI on May 29, 2015, 11:50:44 am
I find each of the characters other than Lena attractive in some way.
I'll agree with that. I'm a lot higher on Zosia Mamet than most people seem to be. I think she'll probably have the best career of any of them, honestly.
loved her in MadMen
Agreed.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Yada on May 29, 2015, 11:55:11 am
I find each of the characters other than Lena attractive in some way.
I'll agree with that. I'm a lot higher on Zosia Mamet than most people seem to be. I think she'll probably have the best career of any of them, honestly.

Big fan. She reminds me of a young Jewish woman from my late teens that only was into me because she thought I was one of them. It worked out in my favor in the end.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: vansmack on May 29, 2015, 11:56:03 am
Absolutely not.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: RatBastard on May 29, 2015, 03:19:46 pm
that was your reply to this thread mister front?  this is my reply.


(http://a.pix.ge/g/4fg0t.jpg)

Who's he?
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Yada on May 29, 2015, 03:24:11 pm
that was your reply to this thread mister front?  this is my reply.


(http://a.pix.ge/g/4fg0t.jpg)

Who's he?

Julian, circa BMI of 14.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Julian, Forum COGNOSCENTI on May 29, 2015, 03:24:37 pm
Julian, circa BMI of 14.
I've never smoked.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: grateful on May 29, 2015, 03:26:01 pm
I find each of the characters other than Lena attractive in some way.
I'll agree with that. I'm a lot higher on Zosia Mamet than most people seem to be. I think she'll probably have the best career of any of them, honestly.

Big fan. She reminds me of a young Jewish woman from my late teens that only was into me because she thought I was one of them. It worked out in my favor in the end.

wait.  you were mistaken for a young jewish woman?
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Yada on May 29, 2015, 03:29:47 pm
I find each of the characters other than Lena attractive in some way.
I'll agree with that. I'm a lot higher on Zosia Mamet than most people seem to be. I think she'll probably have the best career of any of them, honestly.

Big fan. She reminds me of a young Jewish woman from my late teens that only was into me because she thought I was one of them. It worked out in my favor in the end.

wait.  you were mistaken for a young jewish woman?

Yeah... I had a bad crustache and I was growing out my dreads.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: ye-ole-hatch ıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llıl on May 29, 2015, 03:50:06 pm
was this you yada?
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-ELLbNZUdy8c/UO17bM2EciI/AAAAAAAAnKM/tQzqLU55Il0/s1600/dreadlocks.jpeg)
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Yada on June 01, 2015, 02:35:42 pm
(http://photos.vanityfair.com/2015/06/01/556c7a224ae56e586e457d3e_vf-cover-bruce-jenner-july-2015.jpg)
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Julian, Forum COGNOSCENTI on June 01, 2015, 02:37:44 pm
(http://photos.vanityfair.com/2015/06/01/556c7a224ae56e586e457d3e_vf-cover-bruce-jenner-july-2015.jpg)
No.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: i am gay and i like cats on June 01, 2015, 02:59:15 pm
(http://pbs.twimg.com/media/CDeNiv_WAAEnHNi.jpg)

YES



(http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--Coy3tcKI--/c_fit,fl_progressive,q_80,w_636/re9uuuiomp8tdieppvgf.jpg)

NO
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: killsaly on June 01, 2015, 03:19:59 pm
.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: i am gay and i like cats on June 01, 2015, 05:22:24 pm
did you, really just post that, kill,sally?  really?  really?

(https://fabbreeze.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/giphy1.gif)
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: killsaly on June 01, 2015, 05:32:21 pm
I did not see the last posts on page 5, carry on.

(http://38.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxvallZbMe1qfd2iuo1_400.gif)
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: i am gay and i like cats on June 01, 2015, 05:42:59 pm
I think, what you meant to say, was that you were too lazy to look at the, previous page.

(http://ak-hdl.buzzfed.com/static/2013-10/enhanced/webdr06/24/13/anigif_enhanced-buzz-4517-1382636374-31.gif)
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Yada on March 01, 2016, 05:31:39 pm
May or may not be work friendly, depending on where you work...

A nice walk down memory lane.

http://imgur.com/a/Uxug4

Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: vansmack on March 01, 2016, 06:06:00 pm
I don't have the time right now to go through all of them, but I'm sure there's one or two I wouldn't hit.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Yada on March 01, 2016, 06:07:10 pm
I don't have the time right now to go through all of them, but I'm sure there's one or two I wouldn't hit.

pretty great history in the evolution of pubic hair styles as well.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Yada on February 07, 2017, 11:00:02 am
(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/02/07/02/3CE88F3F00000578-0-image-a-92_1486434877660.jpg)
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: hutch on February 07, 2017, 12:42:47 pm
middle
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: sweetcell on February 07, 2017, 01:31:15 pm
smackie, what's the rule for max age?  twice yours minus 17?
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: Space Freely on February 07, 2017, 01:33:27 pm
The best thing about being as old as I am is there are no rules. Except the ones you make together with your wife.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: hutch on February 07, 2017, 03:59:28 pm
The best thing about being as old as I am is there are no rules. Except the ones you make together with your wife.

that is a pretty big rule dude..
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: vansmack on February 07, 2017, 04:01:52 pm
smackie, what's the rule for max age?  twice yours minus 17?

That's a mom (63) and her two daughters (18, 31).  There's no rule on the planet that would keep Smackie away from that.
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: hutch on February 07, 2017, 04:02:33 pm
let me guess that is that loser alcoholic Billy Joel's ugly daughter?

Low ratings for this SI cover..very low..
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: ggw on February 07, 2017, 04:48:51 pm
(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/02/07/02/3CE88F3F00000578-0-image-a-92_1486434877660.jpg)

Christie Brinkley is Jesus?
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: ye-ole-hatch ıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llıl on February 07, 2017, 11:10:44 pm

Christie Brinkley is Jesus?

Seriously, that all I could think about looking at that photo
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: hutch on February 07, 2017, 11:14:19 pm

Christie Brinkley is Jesus?

Seriously, that all I could think about looking at that photo


if that is all you think about you got a serious problem hombre...
Title: Re: Would you hit it: part 2?
Post by: DeathFromAbove1979 on February 08, 2017, 12:11:02 pm

Christie Brinkley is Jesus?

Seriously, that all I could think about looking at that photo

I couldn't stop staring