Author Topic: o.a.r.??  (Read 4564 times)

tiffson

  • Guest
Re: o.a.r.??
« Reply #15 on: December 02, 2004, 06:44:00 pm »
this is my first post on this board, but i just wanted to say how funny you guys are.
 
 now about OAR..im taking my friend to see them, but after reading all this drunken DMB type follwers im not so sure i want to leave smelling like frat boys.
 
 tiffany

freshwill04

  • Guest
Re: o.a.r.??
« Reply #16 on: December 02, 2004, 07:21:00 pm »
Hey, first time posting... I definitely enjoy the wit on this board.
 
 I had a brief exchange with a friend that I think sums up O.A.R. quite nicely.  I said, "But they write the same song dozens of times and give that song a new name every time!"
 
 She said, "I don't care, I like that song!"

Sir HC

  • Member
  • Posts: 4059
Re: o.a.r.??
« Reply #17 on: December 02, 2004, 07:43:00 pm »
They are better than that one jam band (I forget the name) whose solos consist of the same 3 note run up and down the neck of the guitar.  Dee-dull-dee dee-dull-dee dee-dull-dee.  That gets old real quick.

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8545
Re: o.a.r.??
« Reply #18 on: December 03, 2004, 11:16:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Sir HC:
  They are better than that one jam band (I forget the name) whose solos consist of the same 3 note run up and down the neck of the guitar.  Dee-dull-dee dee-dull-dee dee-dull-dee.  That gets old real quick.
If you ask me, that's Dave Matthews.  Saw a short set from him for the first time recently, and I was pretty surprised at how simple the structure of his songs is.

Guiny

  • Guest
Re: o.a.r.??
« Reply #19 on: December 03, 2004, 11:41:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Bags:
 If you ask me, that's Dave Matthews.  Saw a short set from him for the first time recently, and I was pretty surprised at how simple the structure of his songs is. [/QB]
If it's so simple, how come in the last forty years noone else thought to do it and make the big bucks? I know the obvious response is its shiite. But if you can make that much money off of it, surely someone out there before him woulda done it.
 
 I guess I've just never understood the term simple when it comes to music. I know its simple after the fact when someone has already made it up. But its probably not so simple to make up. Or maybe I'm just rambling.

HoyaSaxa03

  • Member
  • Posts: 7053
Re: o.a.r.??
« Reply #20 on: December 03, 2004, 02:27:00 pm »
OAR is the purest form of frat-rock around right now.
 
 It's kind of third-wave ska mixed with PMB / american trad rock stylings, and whoever said that thing about them having one only song is completely right.
 
 Expect a lot of "weathered" baseball hats.
(o|o)

HoyaSaxa03

  • Member
  • Posts: 7053
Re: o.a.r.??
« Reply #21 on: December 03, 2004, 02:31:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Bags:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Sir HC:
  They are better than that one jam band (I forget the name) whose solos consist of the same 3 note run up and down the neck of the guitar.  Dee-dull-dee dee-dull-dee dee-dull-dee.  That gets old real quick.
If you ask me, that's Dave Matthews.  Saw a short set from him for the first time recently, and I was pretty surprised at how simple the structure of his songs is. [/b]
Dave Matthews writes really simple songs, plays a passable rhythm guitar, is a childish lyricist and has an incredibly annoying voice.
 
 His band, however, and especially the drummer Carter, are really top-notch musicians.  They throw in all sorts of innovative poly-afro beats and have good "structured" jams.
(o|o)

Sir HC

  • Member
  • Posts: 4059
Re: o.a.r.??
« Reply #22 on: December 03, 2004, 03:30:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Bags:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Sir HC:
  They are better than that one jam band (I forget the name) whose solos consist of the same 3 note run up and down the neck of the guitar.  Dee-dull-dee dee-dull-dee dee-dull-dee.  That gets old real quick.
If you ask me, that's Dave Matthews.  Saw a short set from him for the first time recently, and I was pretty surprised at how simple the structure of his songs is. [/b]
God Street Wine, I think that is who I was thinking of.

TheWaz

  • Guest
Re: o.a.r.??
« Reply #23 on: December 03, 2004, 03:45:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Sir HC:
  They are better than that one jam band (I forget the name) whose solos consist of the same 3 note run up and down the neck of the guitar.  Dee-dull-dee dee-dull-dee dee-dull-dee.  That gets old real quick.
i used to have to endure a couple hours of jam band music everyday in art class, and you are absolutely right.  now bluegrass takes talent, and sounds good.. but jam bands are just a cheap ripoff version with less talent.

azaghal1981

  • Member
  • Posts: 12034
Re: o.a.r.??
« Reply #24 on: December 04, 2004, 05:05:00 am »
The "same song over and over" statement is definitely dead on. Tiffany, if you go, prepare to leave smelling like fratboys and chances are you'll probably get hit on by 1 or 100. In terms of jambands, older ones definitely over do it when it comes to guitar wanking but newer bands that improvise, imo, are very different and keep the repeating jams to a minimum. Umphrey's McGee and Brothers Past (12/11 at the 9:30) are two perfect examples of younger "jambands" that greatly differ. Umphrey's are very progressive rock-influenced while BP's music is centered around jams with a huge drum 'n bass emphasis. Both of these bands have rediculously talented members and I haven't been this siked for a show in a long time.  :D
احمد