Author Topic: Die, Pitchfork, Die!  (Read 1057 times)

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8545
Die, Pitchfork, Die!
« on: November 29, 2006, 07:01:00 pm »
From Slate
 Full article available  here
 
 music box
 Die, Pitchfork, Die!
 The indie music site that everyone loves to hate.
 By Matthew Shaer
 Posted Tuesday, Nov. 28, 2006, at 7:26 AM ET
 
 
 In July of this year, Bill Baird, a musician for an Austin outfit called Sound Team, drove out to a park near his home, slapped a sign with his band's name onto the chest of a life-size dummy, and stabbed the thing with a giant pitchfork. Then, as a friend filmed the action, Baird threw the dummy off a giant cliff. Later, he set it on fire. The next day, he posted the 51-second clip on YouTube. The impetus for the whole stunt was a 3.7 out of 10 review from online music magazine Pitchfork Media, which had described Sound Team's major-label debut as having "a shortage of, like, actual songs."
 
 Pitchfork is often compared to Rolling Stone in its prime: a music journal that is single-handedly revolutionizing music journalism. That's a stretch, but Pitchfork does resemble its glossy ancestor in one particular way: attracting haters in astonishing numbers. Some people despise Pitchfork because it's too verbose, or too brutal, or they just don't like how the site dismisses established artists because it can. The Web contains large-scale Pitchfork parodies, statistical studies of Pitchfork's review history, and an eloquent, oft-quoted post from writer Daniel Taylor titled "Pitchfork Media Can Suck My Cock." Even venerable indie record label Sub Pop took their shot.
 
 The Pitchfork haters, of course, only help their enemy. Pitchfork's founder, Ryan Schreiber, and his fellow editors can post album and track reviews earlier than most publications and at a greater velocity. They accumulate an incredible amount of wordage each week. But non-Pitchfork bloggers are the real engines of the site's influence. Pitchfork's traffic is modestâ??around 1.5 million unique visitors a monthâ??and it needs help to spread its gospel. Grand critical gestures, therefore, become essential. So does eliciting responses from people like the members of Sound Team. If a review is provocative enough, music geeks will pick up on it. By the time, say, a record-store owner gets around to weighing in on a band, a summary judgment has already been passed online. The phenomenon has a name: the Pitchfork Effect.
 
 [See article for rest of article]

thingsfallapart

  • Member
  • Posts: 340
Re: Die, Pitchfork, Die!
« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2006, 07:56:00 pm »
This was a really great article.  Nearly every point they make is spot on.

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14974
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Die, Pitchfork, Die!
« Reply #2 on: November 30, 2006, 12:28:00 pm »
Having seen the Cold War Children and walking out on them 15 minutes later because I was bored, there is probably justification for the review that got.  Talk about over-hyped, it's spastic music white people can get "funky" too..
T.Rex

bellenseb

  • Member
  • Posts: 1879
Re: Die, Pitchfork, Die!
« Reply #3 on: November 30, 2006, 12:31:00 pm »
How dare Pitchfork not love the Dandy Warhols ...