Author Topic: aaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh.......  (Read 14768 times)

  • Guest
Re: aaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh.......
« Reply #90 on: January 21, 2004, 06:56:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by mankie:
  PHEW! That's okay then.
 
 Do you also realize that most British deaths in Iraq have been Doodle on Brit?
<img src="http://homepage.ntlworld.com/otis.marsden/images/TA.jpg" alt=" - " />

mankie

  • Guest
Re: aaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh.......
« Reply #91 on: January 21, 2004, 06:58:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Dupek Chopra:
   
Quote
Originally posted by mankie:
  ... was wishing everyone happy "orange" day.
Happy orange day to you, too!
     <img src="http://www.phyde.plus.com/gerry_adams_orange.jpg" alt=" - " />     <img src="http://members.the-bronze.me.uk/Harribo/b3ta_posts/dick.jpg" alt=" - " /> [/b]
The one on the left....now there's a terrorist for you. He could teach Osama a thing or two.
 
 Well he's on the left on yours, he's on top on this one....he likes it on top according to his Maze prison pals.

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: aaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh.......
« Reply #92 on: January 21, 2004, 07:22:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
   
Quote
Originally posted by sonickteam2:
  whatever helps you sleep at night.
TRANSLATION:  "Why do I want to be bothered by facts and analysis when it's easier to just rehash the same tired old liberal shibboleth." [/b]
TRANSLATION: i dont believe everything i read.

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8545
Re: aaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh.......
« Reply #93 on: January 21, 2004, 07:23:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
   
Quote
Originally posted by sonickteam2:
 but doesnt it bother you that the US didnt REALLY attack Iraq because of 9/11??
A lot has been made of this Niger thing.  Perhaps that was an overstatement.  Perhaps it was an outright falsehood.  It's such a small part of the larger case that it is inconsequential.  The case for Iraq possessing a WMD program was built on much more than that single item.
 
 It may turn out that the intelligence was all wrong. [/b]
If the "overstatement" had occurred during the Clinton administration, the Republicans would have impeached him again.
 
 Hey, I give the Reps cred on that -- they're relentless and the Dems are too disorganized to do any good with the Administration's weaknesses.

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8545
Re: aaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh.......
« Reply #94 on: January 21, 2004, 07:27:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
   
Quote
Originally posted by sonickteam2:
  whatever helps you sleep at night.
TRANSLATION:  "Why do I want to be bothered by facts and analysis when it's easier to just rehash the same tired old liberal shibboleth." [/b]
GREAT use of the word shibboleth.

walkman

  • Guest
Re: aaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh.......
« Reply #95 on: January 21, 2004, 08:04:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Bags:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Dupek Chopra:
     
Quote
Originally posted by Bags:
 [qb] He's a stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid FUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
 qb]
Hey Samsonite, take a chill pill. [/b]
Hey Samsonite -- that's great!
 
 Can't help my ranting.  I care. [/b]
I'm with you, bags.  However, I prefer to unleash my emotions the old fashioned way...by pissing on the white house, and then running.

Re: aaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh.......
« Reply #96 on: January 22, 2004, 01:00:00 pm »
the real State of the Union Address
 
 http://www.whitehouse.org/news/2004/012004-SOTU.asp

mankie

  • Guest
Re: aaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh.......
« Reply #97 on: January 22, 2004, 01:08:00 pm »
Why do politicians, of any party, insist on wearing ill-fitting suits and really bad haircuts?

Re: aaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh.......
« Reply #98 on: January 22, 2004, 01:13:00 pm »
because they're straight American males and that's the norm for straight American males...complete disregard for fashion
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by mankie:
  Why do politicians, of any party, insist on wearing ill-fitting suits and really bad haircuts?

  • Guest
Re: aaaaaaahhhhhhhhhh.......
« Reply #99 on: January 23, 2004, 12:41:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Mr. Unctuous:
  because they're straight American males and that's the norm for straight American males...complete disregard for fashion
 
   
Rather Henry David Thoreau, don't you think?  Jeffersonian, even.