Author Topic: Surrogate Bands on a wave  (Read 1511 times)

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8545
Surrogate Bands on a wave
« on: August 04, 2005, 02:29:00 pm »
Cool for copy cats
 
 Dave Simpson on why now is such a fertile time for the 'surrogate band'
 
 Friday July 22, 2005
  The Guardian
 
 So far, 2005 has been an exceptional year for Coldplay, with their album X&Y achieving 29 number ones around the world. But it's been a very good 12 months for bands who sound like them as well. Keane have gone from the backrooms of pubs to shifting 4.5m albums. Coldplay soundalikes Athlete (who used to sound like Steely Dan and were nowhere near as successful) have sold half a million copies of their Coldplay-lite album Tourist.
 
 Keane and Athlete are what might be called surrogate bands, who sound and sometimes look similar to another, already much more successful, group. A surrogate band is signed by a label seeking a copy of something with a proven market. Right now, there are so many it can seem as if we're approaching a doomsday scenario where everyone is remaking the same handful of similar-sounding records.
 
 There are numerous morose, David Gray-type songwriters (Damien Rice, Johnathan Rice, James Blunt, Tom Baxter). There are the spiky, shambolic Libertines-type bands (the Rakes, new Virgin signings Kooks, the Others, the Cazals). Hordes of bands owe a bigger-than-healthy debt to Franz Ferdinand, including the Brakes, the Editors, VHS to Beta, the Departure and We Are Scientists. Much of the time, Razorlight are an eerie facsimile of the Strokes. Other spin-offs include the bands being signed because they sound a lot like the Killers, as well as the boy bands because they're from the same management stable as a McFly or Busted. Athlete and Keane are just the famous ones in a fog of bands producing endless permutations of Coldplay's sound.
 
 "Sometimes I think the industry wants - and perhaps, financially, needs - a situation where a massive audience are buying exactly the same records," says Paul Weighell, a former A&R man. If they do want it, it's working. According to Amazon's "People who bought this also bought ..." facility, records by Coldplay, Keane, Athlete and Snow Patrol sell to the same people.
 
 "Usually, someone at a label will say, 'Have you seen how high X are in the charts? We need our own X!'" Weighell explains. He signed the Levellers in the 1990s - and watched as labels snapped up Levellers-sounding groups. "Old-timers used to say, 'We didn't do this in the 1960s and early 1970s', but that's rubbish," says Weighell. "They signed a slew of progressive bands, for example, because they knew there was a market who wanted 30-minute opuses about salads, surgery and brains!"
 
 There's nothing new about replication - it's been going on in pop since Cliff Richard curled his lip like Elvis, or the Beatles spawned the Monkees. The difference is degree. As the music market has got smaller, the cost of launching a new act (marketing, styling, videos, production) has soared, and losses hit harder. So labels play it safer more often by signing identikit acts with a supposedly proven market. It's a risky business, and some in the industry are warning against a meltdown.
 
 "A band like Franz Ferdinand are very interesting," says Andy Ross, Blur's Food Records boss in the 1990s, "but a band influenced by Franz Ferdinand are obviously going to be less interesting, and diminishing returns set in until you reach a point where pop music is over."
 
 The strategy can also backfire. Spiky metal types Feeder became the latest combo to undergo the Coldplay makeover - but their reception at the recent Download festival suggested they have alienated their core audience. If cloning pop is selling like beans, it seems there are only so many varieties the market will sustain.
 
 Generally, a surrogate works best when the original is not around. Keane and Athlete profited when Coldplay were slaving away on X&Y. The Alarm - who Joe Strummer once derided as "a pale imitation of a shadow of the Clash" - had a few hits when their mentors had imploded. A problem is that too many copies of something can damage the original. There was a time when every second band sounded like Oasis. Embrace used to be an Oasis surrogate to the point of adopting similar bravado during interviews. They prospered as the Gallaghers' distinctiveness and creativity wavered. Eventually, both became passe. Embrace now sound like Coldplay: their recent return was on the back of a song written by Chris Martin, who himself was once considered too heavily influenced by Jeff Buckley, who in turn was a surrogate of his father, 1960s singer Tim Buckley.
 
 "Sometimes it does feel like the whole industry is eating itself," says Ross. It could be just another sign of the times, in the same way that fashion designers are now used to seeing their work copied on the high street. But pop culture is supposed to be above this.
 
 Given that the music industry today is dominated by four multinational conglomerates, it's not surprising that much of their output comes down to the preferences of people at the top. One major label A&R man who prefers not to be named has noticed his bosses' obsessions with their own notions of "taste". He believes majors are run by people who don't actually like "rock'n'roll."
 
 "They'll happily say that Sting or the Police are their favourite acts," he whispers. "So someone like Chris Martin comes along, who writes intelligent songs with a bit of a political leaning, and they consider that to be 'quality'. So it becomes 'What we do at this company is provide quality', and the next thing they've signed a band who sound like Coldplay and it becomes this dreadful conveyor belt."
 
 To an extent, record companies will always respond to what's around. If kids like the Libertines, for instance, the chances are they'll pick up a guitar and sound like the Libertines, especially given that their ramshackle sound is easier for young musicians to appropriate. What Ross finds disturbing is the "altogether higher level of cynicism a band would need to transform themselves into something as musically sophisticated as Coldplay".
 
 At the heart of it is pop's obsession with genres. Weighell notices how we no longer ask people "What artists do you like?" but "What sort of music do you like?" A&R men still seem particularly preoccupied with pop's trends and scenes. In the 1990s, for example, it seemed like you just had to come from Manchester to get a record deal. One story had it that entire A&R departments were sent to the Rainy City and told not to come back without one of its bands (or, in the case of the Charlatans, a band that was in the Midlands but sounded "Madchester").
 
 "That story may sound apocryphal but I was there [as Factory Records' publicist] and it did actually happen," laughs Jeff Barrett, head of Heavenly Recordings, whose latest signings are the Magic Numbers. "They came up in coaches and signed those bands!" That's 808 State, Inspiral Carpets, My Jealous God, Mock Turtles, Northside, Intastella, the High, World of Twist, Rig and Paris Angels. Remember them all? Probably not, because usually, by the time the "next wave" or "clone" band have got their album out, the scene has moved on.
 
 "I don't know if the industry ever learns," says Ross, who knows of at least two A&R scouts permanently camped on Wearside trying to find a Futureheads. When Barrett came across something fresher in outsize hippyish folk-duo Magic Numbers, other A&R men asked him: "Are you sure?" "They thought they were 'out of time'," he says.
 
 By contrast, Barrett has first-hand experience of the kind of clamour that results when the industry is desperate for something with a proven market. In 1991, he came across Flowered Up in a London rehearsal room. They had a Shaun Ryder-ish singer in Liam Maher and a Bez-type dancer in Barry Mooncult, though even Bez at his most demented never went onstage dressed as a giant flower. Barrett's Heavenly had them - the major labels wanted them, badly.
 
 "Flowered Up had seen the Mondays and were inspired," Barrett admits. "I saw Liam in a club and I thought he was so now. I didn't think he was Shaun Ryder. But I knew that if I placed them in front of a journalist they would call them the 'London Happy Mondays'. I'm not a cynical person, but I was negotiating a deal with London Records and I'm sure they thought that, too." Flowered Up didn't make it much further than the High. But they did leave behind one unique record in the prophetic, drug-casualty-predicting hit Weekender.
 
 And this is the nub. Surrogates can and do develop. Grunge queen Alanis Morissette was once a talent-show-entering disco diva. Even David Bowie started off as a derided surrogate of cabaret singer Anthony Newley. Perhaps a climate of homogeneity will provoke more wayward talents into doing something different. And when they do, the industry can cope - EMI handled Radiohead's metamorphosis from indie rockers to experimental electronic boffins with Kid A.
 
 But perhaps the most intriguing question is whether an act could be really wily - get signed as a clone and use that platform to create something that's their own. It may have happened already. Few will remember that Blur were originally signed as a baggy band. Their first records in 1990 and 1991 had the much-copied indie-dance groove; Damon Albarn probably wouldn't broadcast this now, but he had a bowl cut and was less cool than the Mock Turtles. But almost immediately Blur reinvented themselves, from psychedelic popsters to Parklife Britpoppers to angular experimentalists - and Albarn's still doing it now with his latest creation, the multimedia Gorillaz.
 
 "Damon's a very intelligent character," says Ross. "I certainly wouldn't bet against him having planned it all along." And these days, Albarn even has his own almost-surrogate in the Blur-ish Kaiser Chiefs. Not bad for someone who began pop life as a copy of Ian Brown.

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8545
Re: Surrogate Bands on a wave
« Reply #1 on: August 04, 2005, 02:33:00 pm »
Look back in anger
 
 Justin Quirk wishes bands took a broader view of the past
 
 Saturday July 23, 2005
  The Guardian
   
 During the press campaign around Oasis's recent, lumpen album, Liam Gallagher slagged off most of the current crop of indie darlings. Sounding exactly like the thick has-been that he is, he derided Franz Ferdinand and Bloc Party, and castigated Pete Doherty and the Libertines for their drug use. The irony was that, with their average guitar music, appalling social climbing, tedious drug habits and slavish devotion to the past, the Libertines are simply Oasis moved forwards 10 years. Where the pub-rocking northerners were the sound of 1967 in 1994, the underwhelming Londoners were 1977 revisited in 2004.
 
 Bands that are weak facsimiles of the past are as stifling and dominant now as Blur and Oasis were in the 1990s. At this rate, in 2015 we can expect to be reading reviews of bands who sound like T'Pau and Climie Fisher. It's distinctly unhealthy when a music that is supposed to pride itself on being forward-looking and iconoclastic is so in hock to the style and values of the past.
 None of this prevents almost every music magazine from repeating the idiotic mantra that "it's a great time for British guitar music". For all that bands fetishise the Clash, few want to move their ideas forward by, say, borrowing from the production techniques of grime in the way that punks did at the time with reggae. The likes of Razorlight and the Bravery simply ape the sound of the past without appropriating any of the attitude.
 
 The bands just copying the past are particularly pointless because they way that they do it is so one-dimensional. Nostalgia doesn't just mean aping the past, but refers to a yearning for your home - ie one that you actually remember, rather than some strange idea you have of a time before you were born. It also has nothing to do with a quasi-nationalistic, idealised history. The few songwriters who get it right have grasped that your memories of a time and place are as bound up with the bad as the good, and that looking back is not necessarily a happy experience. This ambiguity was captured perfectly on odd occasions by Ray Davies (on Dead End Street, for example), Willy Mason's Live It Up and by much of Morrissey's output until he declined into being a passable Morrissey tribute act. Since his decline, the spirit of old England has been most consistently evoked by Luke Haines.
 
 Variously of the Auteurs, Black Box Recorder and Baader-Meinhof, Haines' entire back catalogue is steeped in memories of unsolved murders, 1970s terrorism, plane crashes, child brides and juvenile delinquency. In the new boxset of his work released this month, England generally emerges looking less like a heartwarming world of cricket and warm beer, and more like a terrifying cesspit of racists and paedophiles. Sadly for Haines, he's always been a marginal figure, his grumpy persona and propensity for releasing Christmas singles about kidnapped children ensuring that he's never going to trouble the mainstream. Perhaps that's how it should be. A culture that's always looking backwards is never going to go anywhere - other than straight to a reappraisal of T'Pau in 10 years' time. And no one wants that on their conscience.

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Surrogate Bands on a wave
« Reply #2 on: August 04, 2005, 02:47:00 pm »
Fearful Rock
 
 After the non-talk talk about "indie music" this week, I've been thinking about what people mean most of the time today when they use the term, converting it from economic category into genre, this new loose genre that encompasses the likes of Arcade Fire, Death Cab, the Shins, Iron & Wine, etc.
 
 Often what unites them is a fearfulness, a sense of vulnerability, preciousness, fragility - but also a kind of open, eager curiosity, at their best (and emo suckiness at their worst). And then I suppose there's the escapist indie-kids-dancing complement to that, along with the internal art-noise opposition.
 
 It's all very different than the skeptical anger of the last alternative-goes-mainstream crop a decade ago, aka grunge, and I do think you can use these things as cultural mood rings - their shading can indicate something about what the population that's listening to the music (educated white kids) is feeling, what they generally hear as an accurate self portrait. I can't actually think of any time in rock history where fearfulness was so part of the music - paranoia channelled into aggression, sure, but not this shrinking-violet affect, with its isolationist overtones and so on. (For instance there's a claim that the generation coming of age right now is super-confident and assertive, so self-deprecation and a sense of encroaching doom may serve as the usual kind of peer-group dissent/outlet. And of course there's the new-millennial terror/losing-side-of-the-culture-war element.)
 
 I'm not eager to praise or condemn it tonight, just chalking its outlines on the board, wondering where it intersects the rest of the diagram.

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Surrogate Bands on a wave
« Reply #3 on: August 04, 2005, 02:51:00 pm »
Boys in the Corner
 
 Jonathan Safran Foer, Wes Anderson, Conor Oberst, and the new male infantilism
 
 by Matthew Wilder
 June 22, 2005
 
 Time was, everyone who wanted to wear the Artist Hero's wreath of flowers had to step into the ring. Norman Mailer cemented this routine by decamping from Harvard to combat in the South Pacific, returning to write the jaundiced great American war novel at the salty age of 24. He perpetuated this model by sussing out his literary rivals' weak spots in the cruel, clear-eyed essay "Evaluations: Quick and Expensive Comments on the Talent in the Room" (a model for harsh literary criticism ever since). After Norman and his spiritual godfather Papa Hemingway, every American artist had to play, to some extent, the hard-hearted paterfamilias. Even the epicene Gore Vidal, who lived in a Roman villa, made his bones by getting into near-head-butting matches on TV with Mailer and William F. Buckley. By the '70s, female artists who wanted to share the glory had to strap on fatherly postures and grip brass knuckles. The filmmaker Lina Wertmüller, turning the Holocaust into a coarse porno cartoon; Patti Smith, donning the sweat-stained wifebeater of her forefathers; Erica Jong bracing her hips against the airplane's bathroom sink--all of them had to get their bad-ass ticket punched before they could take center stage.
 
 Where a Scotch-sozzled Big Bruiser once ran onto the fire escape with a roar, rolling up his or her sleeves to challenge the whole U.S. of A. to step outside, now a smallish fellow in a knit cap and woolen sweater sits in the corner with a box of chocolate milk, giggling at his own inadvertent burps. Where Pops built skyscraper-sized mirrors to reflect a metastasizing society, Junior lives in a world we might call Mini-Micro-Narcissus. Son of Big Bruiser, I name you LittleBlue SmurfBoyâ?¢--after the fetish of your patron saint, Donnie Darko, the most sensitive and martyred of your kind. I take this moment to examine the markings of your race, as evinced by your most applauded manifestations: novelist Jonathan Safran Foer, filmmaker Wes Anderson, and musician Conor Oberst.
 
 Of all the celebrated SmurfBoys of the moment, 24-year-old Oberst is for sure the most little and most blue. I can't recall a single live performance that filled me with as much rage as Oberst's unsmiling warm-up for Belle & Sebastian at the Greek Theatre in Los Angeles, in which an anti-Iraq war variation on his current song "Road to Joy" climaxed with Oberst closing his bright eyes and rendering the mock-ecstatic windup--"Let's fuck it up, boys, let's make some noise"--as a literally shivering paean to his own too-raw nerve endings. "Let's fffffuckitup, boys!" Oberst shuddered, his plosive F a talisman of his too-sensitive-to-live fragility. (Even serenading Leno with "When the President Talks to God" can't redeem that long evening.) On his early 2005 album I'm Wide Awake, It's Morning, Oberst the composer devises variations on Robbie Robertson's shambling antebellum melodies that have a crawling-kudzu creepiness, like Matthew Brady photos of carpetbaggers staring shell-shocked into space. But damned if every song isn't shellacked by Oberst's penchant for teen-drama-queen melodrama. No lyric clink of image-shards or exhausted wheeze of Jon Brionesque hurdy-gurdy is permitted to stand its own ground. No, all must be subjugated to the sniffly one's deluge of sensations, impressions, and feelings. (Maybe that's why the title suggests the first, early a.m. words of a demonically overprecocious child.)
 
 Wes Anderson is perhaps the dean of the LittleBlue SmurfBoysâ?¢, having plied his middle-schooler wares for the past decade. Of this trinity of Smurfs, Young Master Wes seems to show the most promise as, if not a Big Bruiser, surely a Soigné Uptown Sophisticate. Where a stunted self-regarder like Oberst seems condemned to an incommunicative trance, the 36-year-old Anderson is aware enough of the lineage of movie auteurs as lion-taming showmen to, some day, escape his autistic fugue state.
 
 In his bizarrely engineless recent effort, The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou, Anderson left the Broadway aspirations of The Royal Tenenbaums to plunge headlong into a silo stuffed with a haut-bourgeois 12-year-old kid's fetish objects. No longer concerned with suspense or surprise, or even story or character, Anderson gives himself a consolation massage as the screen widens with little red ski caps, zany matching Nike tracksuits, Hottentots out of Master Wes's moth-eaten National Geographics, and a series of nautical vehicles that recall the playthings of bath time. Never mastering the rhythm or even the plastic elements of a satisfying tale, Anderson contents his hipster audience by asking, "Wasn't it cool when you were 12 and you really loved [ A Wrinkle in Time/the wallpaper in the Plaza/old New Yorker cartoons/brown Izod shirts on girls...etc. etc.]?" Still, the winning noblesse oblige of Anderson's audio commentaries on the Criterion DVDs of Rushmore and Tenenbaums leave me thinking that the director might one day possess the character traits of a functioning adult.
 
 Anderson has much in common with the 28-year-old novelist Jonathan Safran Foer: a fondness for lovable winking proletarians who help the Little Lord Fauntleroy hero; a fascination for the photos seen in an adolescent's Time-Life Library circa 1981 (anguished tennis players, Jacques Cousteau boats, strolling cavemen); and above all, an almost sexual obsession with the awestruck reactions of an advanced child to the big, bad world. But where Anderson's Cornell-box compositions have a painstaking, madcap charm, Foer's greeting-cards-to-self remind me of critic A.O. Scott's memorably withering words about Tenenbaums: "Yes, yes, you're charming, you're brilliant. Now say good night and go to bed."
 
 In the loudly acclaimed and suddenly backlashed Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, Oskar Schell, the nine-year-old son of a dad immolated in the Twin Towers (a Big Bruisee, like most Foer parents), imagines that it might be neat to invent a sign that families could flash at an ambulance carrying their loved one away, maybe forever: "Goodbye! I love you! Goodbye! I love you!" As he toddles around an Eloise-ish (read: Tenenbaum-ish) Manhattan with a key from his late dad, to open a mysterious lock, Oskar concocts a gizmo that will gather all the tears of New York in a reservoir. For all its borrowed experimental-fiction gimcrackery (illegible pages, blank pages, even Berlitz pages--"I'm sorry, this is the smallest I've got"), Extremely is old-timey yiddishkeit tear-jerking in hipster garments--it's Tuesdays with Morrie for the yellow Converse set.
 
 Like most creative-writing-class escapees, Foer writes in patterns of dreamy-fantastical list-making ("Oskar Schell-- Inventor, Jewelry Designer, Jewelry Fabricator, Amateur Entomologist, Francophile, Vegan, Origamist...") that here constitute the most pathological version yet of the salient LittleBlue SmurfBoyâ?¢ trait--the endless running of fingertips over Stuff I Really Really Like. Foer's infantilism might be as harmlessly engaging as Anderson's if only his when-you-wish-upon-a-star monkeyshines didn't alight on the World Trade Center. Using Ground Zero as a locus for SmurfBoy's first toddle toward naptime without Mom--oof! Queasy-making.
 
 Why are these boy-men ascending all at once? I can only quote one of the brightest LBSB's I know, an aspiring screenwriter and pushing-30 dweller in Mom's guest room, who casually dismissed Raging Bull by sniffing, "That movie doesn't matter, because masculinity isn't like that any more!" He's right, it isn't. (To gauge whether I'm right: Utter the words "Clive Owen" to a heterosexual woman and watch the pupil dilation.) Also: Especially in the world of blue-state liberal-arts grads, and most especially in the world of movie/book/music criticism, there ain't a lot of Big Bruising going on. In this Blue Smurfy climate, the outsized obsessions, red-hot rhetoric, and violent argument of the Bruisers would give the tastemaking class a panic attack. And to be painfully blunt, LBSB art makes critics and editors feel...relaxed, the way '80s decadents like David Salle and Jay McInerney once made them feel rich and hip. In our Age of Terror, educated art consumers and taste arbiters want nothing more than for Mom to make them a grilled cheese with some Swiss Miss Instant Cocoa on the side. The hand-carvings of the sensitive son--sexless, multi-allergic, bubble dwelling--represent a return to comfort, to nonresponsibility, to sleep.
 
 I can only pray some hibernating Bruiser--Don DeLillo, say, or Robert Rauschenberg--will spring from his cave, tear LBSB's Saint-Exupéry scarf off his pencil neck, and show him how it's really done: art-making revealed as high-wire act, fire-eating contest, bare-knuckle barroom brawl.

falconetti

  • Member
  • Posts: 22
Re: Surrogate Bands on a wave
« Reply #4 on: August 04, 2005, 03:34:00 pm »
Bags, thanks for posting these articles.  I was very pleased to learn of the Luke Haines boxset.  Cheers.