Author Topic: DC Police To Monitor District via 5,000 Cameras  (Read 3275 times)

manimtired

  • Member
  • Posts: 1432
Re: DC Police To Monitor District via 5,000 Cameras
« Reply #15 on: April 09, 2008, 04:42:00 pm »
ok...you too seem very "centrist"..good day to you sir.

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: DC Police To Monitor District via 5,000 Cameras
« Reply #16 on: April 09, 2008, 04:57:00 pm »
good thread
o/\o

you be betty

  • Member
  • Posts: 1920
    • flickr.com/photos/youbebetty
Re: DC Police To Monitor District via 5,000 Cameras
« Reply #17 on: April 09, 2008, 04:58:00 pm »
but really, what you all fail to recognize is
 how sweet/mildly annoying of a name
 Darrell Darnell is

Julian, Alleged Computer F**kface

  • Member
  • Posts: 5970
  • JULIAN'S AMERICA - It makes my taco pop!
Re: DC Police To Monitor District via 5,000 Cameras
« Reply #18 on: April 09, 2008, 05:05:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by miss pretentious:
 
 using quotes around the term "gay marriage" as if it is an imaginary thing would be a bit of a slant.
There is no such thing as gay marriage in America. It is, in fact, imaginary. What am I missing?

HoyaSaxa03

  • Member
  • Posts: 7053
Re: DC Police To Monitor District via 5,000 Cameras
« Reply #19 on: April 09, 2008, 11:26:00 pm »
the Times under John Solomon is undergoing some drastic changes (although probably not on their editorial board), and he's a great journalist
 
 I'd give Solomon a few months to shake things up and then give them another chance
 
 And despite their bias they've always been a must-read paper for inside-DC types
(o|o)

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: DC Police To Monitor District via 5,000 Cameras
« Reply #20 on: April 10, 2008, 03:16:00 pm »
Surveillance is one thing, but it's not nearly as powerful without Face Recognition.
27>34

Frank Gallagher

  • Member
  • Posts: 4792
Re: DC Police To Monitor District via 5,000 Cameras
« Reply #21 on: April 10, 2008, 06:26:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by miss pretentious:
  i think i'm more startled that you read the washington times than the article itself.
I think I'm more startled that people read newspapers these days.

flawd101

  • Guest
Re: DC Police To Monitor District via 5,000 Cameras
« Reply #22 on: April 13, 2008, 08:03:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
   
Quote
Originally posted by miss pretentious:
  i think i'm more startled that you read the washington times than the article itself.
I think I'm more startled that people read newspapers these days. [/b]
tru dat

Herr Professor Doktor Doom

  • Member
  • Posts: 3745
    • my blog
Re: DC Police To Monitor District via 5,000 Cameras
« Reply #23 on: April 13, 2008, 01:14:00 pm »
It is hard to respect a newspaper that is owned, heavily staffed, and otherwise dominated by the cult known as the Unification Church (Moonies).  While the Post may have its biases, as all sources do, at least it's not run by agenda-driven cultists.
_\|/_

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: DC Police To Monitor District via 5,000 Cameras
« Reply #24 on: April 14, 2008, 12:09:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by They call me Doctor Doom.:
  It is hard to respect a newspaper that is owned, heavily staffed, and otherwise dominated by the cult known as the Unification Church (Moonies).  While the Post may have its biases, as all sources do, at least it's not run by agenda-driven cultists.
Profit-driven shareholders are the new agenda-driven cultists.

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21759
  • I don't belong here.
Re: DC Police To Monitor District via 5,000 Cameras
« Reply #25 on: April 14, 2008, 09:34:00 am »
profit-driven shareholders aren't new.
<sig>