99.9% are contrived.
I think I may have seen two or three uncontrived ones in my lifetime.
^ Agreed.
I'm with Atomicfront, I like encores though some are obviously contrived. It gives the band a chance to pee and freshen up for a last blowout.
Although, sometimes I have to laugh, or even feel a bit sad for the band, when they quickly turn around and come back to play their planned encore set for fear the crowd will leave without cheering them on for one.
the only way an encore can anything other than contrived is if the band sincerely had no intention of continuing and the audience demands it. Otherwise it's just a dumb ritual, which kind of proves that most rock fans are idiots.
Once or twice over many years, I've seen some local band with a small repertoire finish their set, and people want them to keep playing, and they have to make something up and or play something they haven't really practiced, and it sounds like shit. That's the only time it's actually something special.
Exactly.
The most memorable uncontrived one I saw (the only one I remember off hand, honestly) was the first night of Devo at the club last year. The crowd would not leave for a good 15 minutes and they came out in street clothes and did "Beautiful World." That was a lot of fun.
It was also after a BS contrived encore, though.
Swans treatment of the ritual last year was amusing. They came back, played a bunch of noise for less than a minute then Gira did a solo vocal rendition of "Little Mouth." Anyone ever see a band do a "encore" at Velvet? How could anybody deny the goofiness of that?