people have to spend their money on something.
Huh? Since when? Guess by this statement, we all have too much money sitting around that we must unload. If that were the case, Killsaly and I would have gladly made those purchases. This is about basic economics and having to forfeit something we want and supporting those we prefer over setteling for something else because 'we have to spend our money on something.'
My point was that, ultimately, the small independent supplier and artist will suffer. You blew this off and sidewinded it into something else.
Fuck Wal-Mart! They have plenty of money to work out bulk deals and are very much in bed with China. Besides, I haven't found too many Chinese bands yet I want music from. Besides, Wal-Mart is too busy limiting their music stock to what the big labels want them to push which usually does not coincide with my taste. I prefer to pick and choose my own music rather than have some biggie select it for me.
Both the article and my post would indicate that we do agree with you about a way around will develop but Wal-Mart (at least, I hope!) will not be the solution. Preferably, this will give a little guy a chance to get ahead of this crumbling economy.
I don't have the books for the USPS, nor do you, so I don't have a solution to their problems and if you bothered to notice, I did say that I don't think going back to the old rates was it. I also am not fully convinced that all the woes are due to their pensions either. That's a line that I tend to believe is more about a certain agenda trying to gut any and everyone's pensions, especially if they work for the government in some aspect.
The point is that these increases are going to greatly hurt a lot of little lables and bands who have an international fan base who would love to support them and want the tangibles but won't be able to justify doing so. Very same thing for many other non-music related companies trying to eek out a living by selling products overseas.