Author Topic: The National  (Read 4978 times)

ratioci nation

  • Member
  • Posts: 4463
Re: The National
« Reply #15 on: April 06, 2005, 10:27:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by HoyaSaxa03:
 i'm confused here ... someone on this board is in the national??  or are you just typing into space ...
you are not the one confused here, well not on this matter

grotty

  • Guest
Re: The National
« Reply #16 on: April 06, 2005, 10:33:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Miss MaRpIe:
  I have not get Cherry Tree. Does anyone know if it is good?
 
 Sad songs for dirty lovers is great.
Cherry tree is excellent. Too short though, as it's only an EP.
 
 The self-titled is arguably as good as Sad Songs.
 Though they keep the angst in check more.
 
 Cherry Tree serves as an effective sampler of The National's contrasting handiwork. While the band is at its most powerful when they are in an introspective and moody mode they do make infrequent ventures into a noisier realm where the louder bits are made all the more effective by their restrained usage. Like the best suspense, The National proves that anticipation and suggestion can be just as effective as overwhelming force. The band also does a magnificent job of utilizing their secret weapon - Berninger's pleading and gravelly singing. A voice that he often wields like a weapon - an emotional bludgeon.
 
 Cherry Tree contains one repeat song from Sad Songs For Dirty Lovers - a live rendering of "Murder Me Rachel." It is one of the songs from the record that received a smattering of airplay on indie and internet radio. Ironically, it's also the one song that does the poorest job of representing The National. It's hard indie pop that is not at all indicative of the depth and soul typically found throughout The National's catalog.
 
 Throughout the remainder of Cherry Tree however, you'll find a handful of outstanding songs that complement their best work to date: "Wasp Nest", "All The Wine" and "About Today."
 
 If there is a fault to be found on Cherry Tree it's that it is too short at less than 30 minutes. But it was never intended to be more than a place holder as the band is currently preparing a batch of new songs for unveiling on their third full-length record (their first on the Beggars Banquet label) during Spring 2005.
 
 Let the countdown begin for one of next year's most anticipated releases.

HoyaSaxa03

  • Member
  • Posts: 7053
Re: The National
« Reply #17 on: April 06, 2005, 10:36:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by pollardteam2:
   
Quote
Originally posted by HoyaSaxa03:
 i'm confused here ... someone on this board is in the national??  or are you just typing into space ...
you are not the one confused here, well not on this matter [/b]
now i'm even more confused.
(o|o)

brennser

  • Member
  • Posts: 3758
Re: The National
« Reply #18 on: April 06, 2005, 11:33:00 am »
its good but not as good as sad songs - would be happy to provide burnage markie
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by Miss MaRpIe:
  I have not get Cherry Tree. Does anyone know if it is good?
 
 Sad songs for dirty lovers is great.

sonickteam

  • Member
  • Posts: 293
Re: The National
« Reply #19 on: April 06, 2005, 11:47:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by HoyaSaxa03:
   
Quote
Originally posted by pollardteam2:
   
Quote
Originally posted by HoyaSaxa03:
 i'm confused here ... someone on this board is in the national??  or are you just typing into space ...
you are not the one confused here, well not on this matter [/b]
now i'm even more confused. [/b]
the one who is confused is the one who you are confused about, even though they do not know they are confused.

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: The National
« Reply #20 on: April 06, 2005, 11:51:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by brennser:
   would be happy to provide burnage markie
 
   
[/QB][/QUOTE]
 
 Thanks for the offer, I have heard most of the songs off of it via Woxy.... I think I'll just pick it up at their next local show.

  • Guest
Re: The National
« Reply #21 on: April 06, 2005, 02:55:00 pm »
<img src="http://mlb.imageg.net/graphics/product_images/pMLB2-1778398reg.jpg" alt=" - " />

Re: The National
« Reply #22 on: April 06, 2005, 03:03:00 pm »
I saw a local FOX report after the Nationals played the Mets in an exhibition game, and all five of the players they interviewed after the game were white. What are the odds of that happening randomly?

brennser

  • Member
  • Posts: 3758
Re: The National
« Reply #23 on: April 06, 2005, 03:06:00 pm »
you're the statistician....you tell us

HoyaSaxa03

  • Member
  • Posts: 7053
Re: The National
« Reply #24 on: April 06, 2005, 03:13:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer:
  I saw a local FOX report after the Nationals played the Mets in an exhibition game, and all five of the players they interviewed after the game were white. What are the odds of that happening randomly?
by white, do you mean english-speaking american?  if you include "white" hispanics, it wouldn't be that random for all the players interviewed to be "white" ...
 
 if you're referring to americans, well, news services usually try to get interviews with people who speak english well, not a racial/ethnic bias, but there just aren't that many african-americans on the nationals
 
 i read a really good article a while back encouraging sammy sosa to only give interviews in spanish because his broken english made him easily mockable and made him sound un-intelligent ... i thought the writer had a very good point ...
(o|o)

Re: The National
« Reply #25 on: April 06, 2005, 03:17:00 pm »
I had the sound off, so didn't actually hear what they said, but the five that were interviewed were:
 
 Day, Eischhen, Schneider, Wilkerson, and Church.
 
 I used to listen to a number of post-game Oriole interviews on the radio, and they certainly never limited themselves to those who spoke perfect English.

  • Guest
Re: The National
« Reply #26 on: April 06, 2005, 03:27:00 pm »
<img src="http://www.sportsspin.com/categories/Preview/Sosa.140.jpg" alt=" - " />
  Me talk good !