Author Topic: Forget Fox, fine the parents!  (Read 2706 times)

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Forget Fox, fine the parents!
« on: October 13, 2004, 01:02:00 pm »
FCC Proposes Indecency Fine Against Fox TV
 Agency Continues Its Crackdown on Airwaves
 
 By Frank Ahrens and Lisa de Moraes
 Washington Post Staff Writers
 Wednesday, October 13, 2004; Page A01
 
 The Federal Communications Commission yesterday proposed a record-setting $1.2 million fine against 169 Fox television stations for an April 2003 broadcast of "Married by America" that featured whipped-cream-covered strippers and digitally obscured nudity.
 
 It is the agency's most recent ruling in its stepped-up effort to police radio and television. Complaints to the FCC are at an all-time high as viewers and lawmakers object to the increasing raunchiness of over-the-air radio and television, and broadcasters compete to keep pace with edgier cable programming.
 
 Yesterday's action against Fox and its affiliates was the largest for indecency on television. It was the first of several expected indecency rulings, including what is likely to be a multimillion-dollar agreement with Viacom Inc.'s radio stations to settle violations by Howard Stern and others.
 
 The FCC regulates radio and television broadcasts that transmit over the free public airwaves, but it has no authority over cable and satellite programming that viewers pay for. Last week, Stern announced that he would move to satellite radio when his contract is up, in part to escape FCC scrutiny.
 
 Since October 2003, the FCC has proposed $3.8 million in fines against radio and television broadcasters for violations of the agency's indecency rules, which state that programming relating to sexual or excretory functions may not be broadcast between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., when children are most likely to be in the audience.
 
 For all of 2002, the FCC proposed only $99,400 in indecency fines; in 2001, $91,000. Before that, the largest indecency settlement was a $1.7 million deal in 1995 to settle indecency charges prompted by Stern.
 
 Within weeks, the agency plans to announce a settlement of $2 million to $5 million with Viacom's Infinity Broadcasting radio stations, FCC sources said. The settlement would cover nearly $500,000 in already-proposed fines and several potential violations under investigation. The settlement would be separate from September's $550,000 proposed fine against Viacom-owned CBS television stations for singer Janet Jackson's breast-baring incident during the Super Bowl halftime show.
 
 The Viacom radio settlement would exceed the $1.7 million paid by radio giant Clear Channel Communications Corp. in June in a similar agreement, said the FCC sources, who would not speak for attribution because the settlement is not final. Viacom declined to comment.
 
 The flurry of television rulings is prompted by a license-renewal process that began Oct. 1. The FCC is trying to settle or clear as many television indecency cases as possible so they will not hold up license-renewal applications. For example, the FCC is preparing to rule that some shows viewers complained about, such as NBC's "Coupling," did not violate indecency standards.
 
 Unlike the Super Bowl fines -- which were levied against CBS's 20 owned stations and not the more than 200 affiliate stations that also broadcast the show -- the fines for airing the episode of the short-lived series "Married by America" are proposed against all of Fox's 35 owned and 134 affiliate stations.
 
 The FCC ruled that CBS affiliates had no role in planning the live halftime show and could not have known what might happen. In contrast, the agency said, none of the Fox stations declined to broadcast the taped episode and were therefore culpable. The episode was watched by an estimated 388,000 children age 11 and younger, according to Nielsen Media Research.
 
 Yesterday, the FCC said that even though "Married by America" digitally obscured, or "pixelated" exposed breasts, the pixelation "does little to obscure the overtly sexual and gratuitous nature of the bachelor/bachelorette party scenes," the FCC wrote.
 
 The FCC said the six-minute segment included a variety of sexual activities, including a man in his underwear on all fours being spanked by two topless strippers.
 
 Although the nudity was pixelated, "even a child would have known that the strippers were topless and that sexual activity was being shown," the FCC wrote.
 
 Fox took issue with the FCC's characterization of the episode. "We disagree with the FCC's decision and believe the content was not indecent," Fox spokesman Scott Grogin said last night. Fox still has to decide whether to pay the fine or appeal the ruling.
 
 The FCC limited the Fox fine to $7,000 per station, far less than the $32,500 the law allows. Even though the "Married by America" episode was considered tasteless, the FCC sources said, the indecency judgment was less clear-cut in this case than in others that received higher fines.
 
 One Hollywood executive who works in reality television and agreed to talk only anonymously said viewers have more power to shield their children from scheduled television shows than they do from unexpected commercials for R-rated movies or promotions for local news shows that tout "20 dead, five raped, coming up at 11."
 
 "The FCC is wasting time, and they should recognize that as adults we can be responsible for our children. They should monitor things we don't have control over," the executive said. "It's a Fox show, and people should know what they're getting themselves into."
 
 The agency said it received 159 viewer complaints about "Married by America." In 2003, the FCC said it received 240,000 complaints about 390 television shows.
 
 Â© 2004 The Washington Post Company
27>34

hitman

  • Member
  • Posts: 632
Re: Forget Fox, fine the parents!
« Reply #1 on: October 13, 2004, 01:10:00 pm »
This is just a bunch of shit.  Can stations get fined for just airing shit, like what is on most of broadcast TV?

thirsty moore

  • Member
  • Posts: 6131
Re: Forget Fox, fine the parents!
« Reply #2 on: October 13, 2004, 01:13:00 pm »
Wouldn't that be getting pretty close to censorship hitman?
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by hitman:
  This is just a bunch of shit.  Can stations get fined for just airing shit, like what is on most of broadcast TV?

bellenseb

  • Member
  • Posts: 1883
Re: Forget Fox, fine the parents!
« Reply #3 on: October 13, 2004, 01:16:00 pm »
Does this mean that if everyone on this board complained, we could get a station fined millions?!
 
 159 people is crazy.

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 15336
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Forget Fox, fine the parents!
« Reply #4 on: October 13, 2004, 01:24:00 pm »
in ye good olde days prior to email, all it took was one crank and a typewriter to complain about a show to have the fcc take action.
T.Rex

keithstg

  • Member
  • Posts: 402
Re: Forget Fox, fine the parents!
« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2004, 01:25:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by bellenseb:
 159 people is crazy.
You're right, especially when Oprah got thousands of complaints based on a discussion that ocurred on her show a while ago. Of course, Howard Stern asked people to write in and complain, but still.

hitman

  • Member
  • Posts: 632
Re: Forget Fox, fine the parents!
« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2004, 01:36:00 pm »
It's called sarcasm...  :eek:  
 
 And basically that is all the FCC has been doing since the Jackson incident is censorship.
 
   
Quote
Originally posted by econo:
  Wouldn't that be getting pretty close to censorship hitman?
 
   
Quote
Originally posted by hitman:
  This is just a bunch of shit.  Can stations get fined for just airing shit, like what is on most of broadcast TV?
[/b]

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Forget Fox, fine the parents!
« Reply #7 on: October 13, 2004, 02:02:00 pm »
How about anal fisting?
 
 If they refuse to show anal fisting on ABC Primetime, isn't that censorship?
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by hitman:
  It's called sarcasm...   :eek:  
 
 And basically that is all the FCC has been doing since the Jackson incident is censorship.
 
   
Quote
Originally posted by econo:
  Wouldn't that be getting pretty close to censorship hitman?
 
     
Quote
Originally posted by hitman:
  This is just a bunch of shit.  Can stations get fined for just airing shit, like what is on most of broadcast TV?
[/b]
[/b]

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Forget Fox, fine the parents!
« Reply #8 on: October 13, 2004, 02:08:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  How about anal fisting?
 
 
You just can't put the thumb in.  4 Fingers is acceptable.
 
 Now, if the thumb goes in too....I don't even want to think about the reprecussions.
27>34

thirsty moore

  • Member
  • Posts: 6131
Re: Forget Fox, fine the parents!
« Reply #9 on: October 13, 2004, 02:09:00 pm »
There was a time, in 1977, where this argument was used.  Courts, elementary schools, ice cream parlors, etc.  It fell by the wayside and grew some moss, but GGW came back, dusted it off and has sparked a rennaisance!
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  How about anal fisting?
 
 If they refuse to show anal fisting on ABC Primetime, isn't that censorship?

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Forget Fox, fine the parents!
« Reply #10 on: October 13, 2004, 02:20:00 pm »
I'm all about this "retro" thing.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by econo:
  There was a time, in 1977, where this argument was used.  Courts, elementary schools, ice cream parlors, etc.  It fell by the wayside and grew some moss, but GGW came back, dusted it off and has sparked a rennaisance!
 

RonniStar

  • Member
  • Posts: 364
Re: Forget Fox, fine the parents!
« Reply #11 on: October 13, 2004, 04:55:00 pm »
:eek:  Who lets their kids watch crap like Married By America? I thought parents knew better than to let their kids watch innappropiate shows!

Sir HC

  • Member
  • Posts: 4059
Re: Forget Fox, fine the parents!
« Reply #12 on: October 13, 2004, 04:56:00 pm »
I like the term "proposed fines".  Can the networks say no to these proposals?
 
 What of those pixelated ads with the naked man.  What of all the other times you see pixelated nudity?  This is just the tip of that iceberg.  F**k Powell Junior.

flawd101

  • Guest
Re: Forget Fox, fine the parents!
« Reply #13 on: October 13, 2004, 09:26:00 pm »
i know most kids hated the pixels.  its just people with too much spare time.  i remember trying to see around pixels and using my imagination.  
 
 how many ppl actually watched the show.  i think they should base it on a percentage of complaints to viewers...
 
 we should all complain about the news and get those lyng fuckers fined, for fucking with the countries heads...i'm offended by these stupid fucking TV shows that get on the air.  do they really think we all want to watch full house a saved by the bell all day.  they must realize these shows don't last unlike people like them.  majority rule is should be applied over a bunch of bitches...etc......

hitman

  • Member
  • Posts: 632
Re: Forget Fox, fine the parents!
« Reply #14 on: October 14, 2004, 12:48:00 am »
Well if I have to endure anymore ads from Viagra, Levitra or Cialis about having a stiffy for four hours, then I should at least be able to enjoy viewing at least a little female anal penetration.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  How about anal fisting?
 
 If they refuse to show anal fisting on ABC Primetime, isn't that censorship?
 
   
Quote
Originally posted by hitman:
  It's called sarcasm...    :eek:    
 
 And basically that is all the FCC has been doing since the Jackson incident is censorship.
 
     
Quote
Originally posted by econo:
  Wouldn't that be getting pretty close to censorship hitman?
 
     
Quote
Originally posted by hitman:
  This is just a bunch of shit.  Can stations get fined for just airing shit, like what is on most of broadcast TV?
[/b]
[/b]
[/b]