Author Topic: Chemists are not scientists?  (Read 5823 times)

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Chemists are not scientists?
« Reply #15 on: September 08, 2003, 01:29:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Anton Newcombe:
  I saw a new maserati convertible in Georgetown last week. I was hoping it was going to be you driving it, but it was some middle aged guy, balding with a big paunch and a small willy. His bird was ugly too.......
So it was Mankie?
 
 
 Oh....that was too easy.

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: Chemists are not scientists?
« Reply #16 on: September 08, 2003, 01:31:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
 
 
 Oh....that was too easy.
I knew someone would be able to work with it.
 
 Hey Mankie how many dark metallic blue convertible mazzers have you sold/are there in the country?

mankie

  • Guest
Re: Chemists are not scientists?
« Reply #17 on: September 08, 2003, 01:43:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Anton Newcombe:
  I saw a new maserati convertible in Georgetown last week. I was hoping it was going to be you driving it, but it was some middle aged guy, balding with a big paunch and a small willy. His bird was ugly too.......
So it was Mankie?
 
 
 Oh....that was too easy. [/b]
Middle aged - getting there!
 Balding - NOPE
 Big paunch - GONE!
 Small willy - I'll never say...how did you know?
 Ugly bird - Never in my company.
 
 Mind you, with that description are you sure it wasn't a Porsche?

mankie

  • Guest
Re: Chemists are not scientists?
« Reply #18 on: September 08, 2003, 01:46:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Anton Newcombe:
   
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
 
 
 Oh....that was too easy.
I knew someone would be able to work with it.
 
 Hey Mankie how many dark metallic blue convertible mazzers have you sold/are there in the country? [/b]
Dark blue is Maserati's traditional color so tends to be one of the more popular ones, if I had to guess there's probably about 300 in the country. The US only gets 1,100 cars per year total, so there's not many mazzers at all.
 
 Beautiful cars though aren't they markie? Did you manage to see the interior? I'm guessing you did seeing that you saw the drivers willy.

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: Chemists are not scientists?
« Reply #19 on: September 08, 2003, 01:46:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by mankie:
 Mind you, with that description are you sure it wasn't a Porsche?
yes, maybe a good description of an average porsche driver.
 
 The corvette hits the same demographic, but the guys are always single and you can see their chest wigs.

mankie

  • Guest
Re: Chemists are not scientists?
« Reply #20 on: September 08, 2003, 01:48:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Anton Newcombe:
 
Quote

 
 The corvette hits the same demographic, but the guys are always single and you can see their chest wigs. [/b]
That's not a chest wig, that's their toupe that they shove down their shirt so it doesn't blow away.

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: Chemists are not scientists?
« Reply #21 on: September 08, 2003, 01:50:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by mankie:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Anton Newcombe:
   
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
 [qb]
 
 Oh....that was too easy. [/b]
Beautiful cars though aren't they markie? [/b]
It wasnt as pretty as I imagined. but convertibles with their top up often look a little ungainly. I think it would have looked better with the old boomerang lights. I didnt see inside. It was driving by, albeit slowly.
 
 In looks terms I think the big jag is prettier, but not in gold. I hate gold colured cars.

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 15174
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Chemists are not scientists?
« Reply #22 on: September 08, 2003, 01:50:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by mankie:
 Small willy - I'll never say...how did you know?
 
well at least you've had a song written about you, "little willy" - sweet", which is more than markie can say for himself
T.Rex

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: Chemists are not scientists?
« Reply #23 on: September 08, 2003, 01:51:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by mankie:
 
 The corvette hits the same demographic, but the guys are always single and you can see their chest wigs.
That's not a chest wig, that's their toupe that they shove down their shirt so it doesn't blow away. [/QB][/QUOTE]
 
 ahh, thanks mankie, I will be stealing that line.....
 
 Why are corvette drivers always lone?

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: Chemists are not scientists?
« Reply #24 on: September 08, 2003, 01:53:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by kosmo vinyl:
   "little willy" - sweet"
there will be, no flowers for willy. <<<Television>>>

mankie

  • Guest
Re: Chemists are not scientists?
« Reply #25 on: September 08, 2003, 02:02:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Anton Newcombe:
 
Quote
Why are corvette drivers always lone? [/b]
Because the only other people who would actually get into a Corvette are out driving their own?

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: Chemists are not scientists?
« Reply #26 on: September 08, 2003, 02:02:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Anton Newcombe:
   
Quote
Originally posted by kosmo vinyl:
   "little willy" - sweet"
there will be, no glamour for willy. <<<Television>>> [/b]

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: Chemists are not scientists?
« Reply #27 on: September 08, 2003, 02:06:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by mankie:
  [/qb]
Because the only other people who would actually get into a Corvette are out driving their own? [/QB][/QUOTE]
 
 I dunno I have never been in one. The mustang I drove was  a hoot though. It had a live rear axle........
 
 It was probably the worst car I have ever driven, worse even than the 80s fiesta with big rust holes.

mankie

  • Guest
Re: Chemists are not scientists?
« Reply #28 on: September 08, 2003, 02:12:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Anton Newcombe:
   
Quote
Originally posted by mankie:
  [/b]
Because the only other people who would actually get into a Corvette are out driving their own? [/QB]
I dunno I have never been in one. The mustang I drove was  a hoot though. It had a live rear axle........
 
 It was probably the worst car I have ever driven, worse even than the 80s fiesta with big rust holes. [/QB][/QUOTE]
 
 The problem with yank *ahem* "performance" cars is that the engineers put all their efforts into horsepower and seem to forget that we turn corners once in a while so don't bother with minor shit like handling and stuff...Vipers, Corvettes, Mustangs...all the same. Even the Shelby Series 1 we have here has crap handling.

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: Chemists are not scientists?
« Reply #29 on: September 08, 2003, 02:19:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by mankie:
   Even the Shelby Series 1 we have here has crap handling.
how bad is it? It should be good..... Its not too heavy, is it?  Which is a lot of the other cars problems.