Author Topic: Things Smackie Thinks You Need to Know...  (Read 2090448 times)

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Things Smackie Thinks You Need to Know...
« Reply #105 on: December 03, 2007, 12:59:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
  This was the original thread.
 
 
 ODIHR unable to observe Russian Duma elections -Press release
 
 
 Russian Police Detain Kasparov[/url]
 By AP/MANSUR MIROVALEV
 
         
 The rewriting of history
Russia's election
 
 How it was rigged
 
 Dec 3rd 2007 | MOSCOW
 From Economist.com
 
 A farce of a poll, but Vladimir Putin looks stronger
 
 IT WAS never in doubt that Vladimir Putinâ??s United Russia party would get a sweeping victory in the parliamentary elections on Sunday December 2nd. The entire government machine, the court system, the prosecution service, the police, the state media and even the central commission itself were deployed to produce a landslide victory. The result was programmed months ago: United Russia got its 64%; just three other partiesâ??the Communists, the ultra-nationalist and obedient Liberal Democratic Party and Just Russia, a Kremlin satelliteâ??passed a 7% threshold.
 
 Nor was there any doubt that the poll was rigged.
27>34

HoyaSaxa03

  • Member
  • Posts: 7053
Re: Things Smackie Thinks You Need to Know...
« Reply #106 on: December 03, 2007, 01:14:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
  ESPN is having a contest for the greatest Sportscenter Commercial of all time
my roommate in college was the georgetown bulldog mascot
 
 he almost killed himself at the ESPN the Magazine "Mascot Picnic" ... remember those 2-min ads that ran non-stop on ESPNNEWS for a while?  he inexplicably jumped off a picnic table onto an enormous bouncy ball, almost snapped his neck in half
 
 he was also in a pretty good one where he steals some nascar driver's car and does doughnuts in the parking lot
(o|o)

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
27>34

ratioci nation

  • Member
  • Posts: 4463
Re: Things Smackie Thinks You Need to Know...
« Reply #108 on: December 03, 2007, 02:43:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
  Vansmack and Venerable want you to know that:
 
 (1) The Top 4 are automatically eligible
 
 (2) The Top 14 teams have priority
 
 (3) No more than two teams from each divsion of the SEC, ACC, Big 10, Big 10, Pac 10 or Big East can qualify
 
 (4) Any non "Big Division" team in the top 12 must be picked (Hawaii is currently down by 21)
 
 (5) Rose Bowl gets first pick if (when) one of their teams is picked
 
 Therefore, Illinois and ASU stand to benefit, while Florida and either Mizzou or Kansas stand to lose out despite being in the top 10 in the BCS.
 
 We assume the C in BCS stands for clusterfuck.  We are therefore, sympathetic to two things:
 
 (1) Conference Championship corollary (or the Mizzou Rule) - if you make the conference championship, you deserve priority over another divison team who didn't make the conference championship if you're in the top 14 [but we can be swayed to top 10 instead fo 14].
 
 (2) The old bowl format with a "Plus One" Game
 
 This is worse than 2001, but not as bad as 2004.
Why should anyone bother watching college football until this shit is cleared up. The orange bowl and rose bowl can go fuck themselves.

Re: Things Smackie Thinks You Need to Know...
« Reply #109 on: December 03, 2007, 02:45:00 pm »
Hey Smackie, when are you going over to Russia to help them get things straightened out?

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: Things Smackie Thinks You Need to Know...
« Reply #110 on: December 03, 2007, 02:47:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by pdx pollard:
 Why should anyone bother watching college football until this shit is cleared up. The orange bowl and rose bowl can go fuck themselves.
i dont know about anyone else but i only watch my team (penn state) and even then not every week. might watch the championship game too
o/\o

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Things Smackie Thinks You Need to Know...
« Reply #111 on: December 03, 2007, 02:57:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by pdx pollard:
  Why should anyone bother watching college football until this shit is cleared up. The orange bowl and rose bowl can go fuck themselves.
I am definitely boycotting the Orange Bowl.  There's no way I'm watching that.  
 
 I will, however, watch the Rose Bowl because they have been consistently against the BCS from the beginning and this is just another show by them as to why the BCS is not the proper solution.  I kind of like that they kept tradition and picked an eligible Big 10 team.
27>34

ratioci nation

  • Member
  • Posts: 4463
Re: Things Smackie Thinks You Need to Know...
« Reply #112 on: December 03, 2007, 02:59:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
 I am definitely boycotting the Orange Bowl.  There's no way I'm watching that.  
 
 I will, however, watch the Rose Bowl because they have been consistently against the BCS from the beginning and this is just another show by them as to why the BCS is not the proper solution.  I kind of like that they kept tradition and picked an eligible Big 10 team.
a 3 loss big 10 team that Missouri beat on a neutral field, its bs no matter how you slice it

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Things Smackie Thinks You Need to Know...
« Reply #113 on: December 03, 2007, 03:08:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
  Hey Smackie, when are you going over to Russia to help them get things straightened out?
Been there, done that.  I'm retired from the International Develoment world, especially in the NIS (and under this administration).  There are plenty of young people out there with more enrgy than me who can still make a difference though.
 
 I would like to point this out however:  disagree with Chavez all you want, but he put his socialist reforms for Venezuela up for referendum and lost.  He was even gracious in defeat.  It might not have been a completely fair election by international parlance, but it was 1000 times more fair than Russia.
 
 Both of these votes illustrate, however, that as long as these rulers enjoy huge revenues from gas/oil to buy the peoples vote, people will support them.
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Things Smackie Thinks You Need to Know...
« Reply #114 on: December 03, 2007, 03:14:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by pdx pollard:
 a 3 loss big 10 team that Missouri beat on a neutral field, its bs no matter how you slice it
I'm not saying it was the best pick, but it at least can be explained by tradition, which was the Rose Bowl's fight with the BCS from the very beginning.  They've been consistent.
 
 The Orange Bowl has absolutely no excuse for not picking Mizzou.  I can't even imagine it was better for revenues.
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Things Smackie Thinks You Need to Know...
« Reply #115 on: December 03, 2007, 03:24:00 pm »
BTW - I'll be running a Bowl Pool this year as soon as it's available.  I don't think Yahoo has ever done one, so I've been using CBS for the past few years.  You pick every game (no spreads) and then rank them based on your confidence in the winner (1-33).  
 
 I'm up for suggestions if anyone has any better ideas for a college bowl pool.
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Things Smackie Thinks You Need to Know...
« Reply #116 on: December 03, 2007, 03:44:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
  There's really never going to be much progress in the Islamic World until there can be better understanding of Shar'ia Law and it's inability to adapt to modern basic freedoms:
 
 British Teacher Sentenced to 15 Days in Sudan Prison
 
 
It really is going to take brave Muslim leaders in free countries to do more of this to help with all of the disagreements:
 
 Sudan's President pardoned the British School teacher after meeting with two Muslim members of Britain's House of Lords, Nazir Ahmed and Sayeeda Warsi, who had traveled to the predominantly Muslim African nation to lobby for her release.
 
 Kudos to them.
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Things Smackie Thinks You Need to Know...
« Reply #117 on: December 03, 2007, 08:44:00 pm »
Law Professor Estimates His Copyright Liability in the Billions
 
 To make the point that copyright law is wildly out of sync with people's behavior and expectations, a law professor at the University of Utah has published an article describing how he would be liable for an estimated $4.5-billion in damages a year if copyright holders assiduously enforced their rights. The professor, John Tehranian, says he starts the day infringing when he responds to e-mail messages. His responses automatically include copies of the messages on which he is commenting. Within an hour he has replied to and forwarded 20 e-mail messages, making him liable for $3-million in statutory damages, Mr. Tehranian writes in the Utah Law Review. Later, he violates the Copyright Act when he distributes to his students copies of three Internet articles analyzing a Supreme Court decision handed down an hour earlier. And when he bares his chest to go swimming he reveals a Captain Caveman tattoo on his right shoulder.
 
 The professor acknowledges he is assuming a narrow interpretation of fair use and a reading of case law that favors copyright holders. Still, his point is that the law needs fixing. "One must either irrationally conclude that John is a criminal infringer--a veritable grand larcenist--or blithely surmise that copyright law must not mean what it appears to say," he writes. "Something is clearly amiss."--Andrea L. Foster
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Things Smackie Thinks You Need to Know...
« Reply #118 on: December 04, 2007, 01:57:00 pm »
I woke up this morning with the feeling there was going to be an early Christmas present like the year I found out the Angels signed Vlad.  Well, there wasn't anything yet, but I did read this from the BirdMart section (the clearance store for cheap MLB players):
 
 The Orioles and Dodgers met last night and discussed Miguel Tejada, according to two baseball sources. But according to one source, the match between the two teams did not appear to be there. Tejada has let it be known that he is only willing to move to third base if he goes to a contending team.
 
 All of my Dodger fan friends loved that.
27>34

godsshoeshine

  • Member
  • Posts: 4826
Re: Things Smackie Thinks You Need to Know...
« Reply #119 on: December 04, 2007, 02:13:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
  I woke up this morning with the feeling there was going to be an early Christmas present like the year I found out the Angels signed Vlad.  
or last year with larrson
o/\o