I generally don't measure the diversity of my friendships based on what type of music they prefer.
And if music taste asctually did matter when it comes to friendships...Perhaps 1% of the general population is into punk rock. I live a sheltered life because none of my friends are punk rock lovers?
I guess my whole point is that if you consider the whole population of the world as music lovers (and really, who doesn't like music to some extent?), then punk rock is just a small blip on the radar screen. Huge blip for music writers living in big American and British cities, but to the general population of the world...no, I just don't think so.
And as for punks influence on the world at large...just a minor blip.
Sorry I don't tow the party line on this one.
Originally posted by Arlette:
Originally posted by Etan de Balzac, Footie Ball Player:
So basically you're saying punk matters now because Green Day sells 10 milion albums?
I'll give you that punk mattered to the thousands of Americans that were listened to it.
However, other than those thousands, it didn't really matter to anybody. Punk circa 1980 matters to many more people today than it did then. So it would be incorrect to say "punk back when it did matter" because to only small numbers of people did it matter.
And even today, I'd wager that punk matters to nobody I know outside of this chatboard. Then again, my family and friend set lacks aging hipsters and 15 year olds. Sorry.
So it doesn't matter to people you know, ergo, it doesn't matter. Nice thinking pattern there, you're a regular logician.
Maybe you don't have a lot of diverse friendships. One of my best friends LOVES bluegrass, I can't stand it. Another friend is into opera, again I couldn't care less. But I love the differences because it exposes me to different things.
If you can use your circle of friends and family as the barometer of what matters, and exclude punk from that, well, then you live a sheltered life. [/b]