tis tis Jay Reatard..pretty punk rock dude

[Frank Gallagher]

Originally posted by HoyaSaxa03:
   

Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
  These *ahem* rockstars are super tough punching out at fans when they have the likes of "THATGUY" protecting them should the fan fight back.

you're a moron
 
 reatard's whole complaint was that the club didn't provide any security to stop an over-sold (and apparently over-served) crowd from destroying his gear ... no one was going to "protect him should the fan fight back"
 
 way to get the story straight before you spout off [/b]

Pot - kettle
 
 Why add fuel to the fire by punching one of the overzealous fans, or kicking one off the stage if your concern is lack of security?
 
 Not to smart huh? Mr. Drysdale....

[HoyaSaxa03]

Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
 Why add fuel to the fire by punching one of the overzealous fans, or kicking one off the stage if your concern is lack of security?

while i'm obviously not inside his head, jay made it pretty clear that his concern about the lack of security was for his gear, not his person ... and at that point it seems as though his gear was already destroyed, so it didn't really matter much
 
 and that doesn't change the fact that, as usual, you completely missed the point of this before you went off on some bizarre rant

[ggw]

Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
 Not to smart huh?

Sometimes the jokes write themselves...

[Frank Gallagher]

Originally posted by HoyaSaxa03:
   

Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
 Why add fuel to the fire by punching one of the overzealous fans, or kicking one off the stage if your concern is lack of security?

while i'm obviously not inside his head, jay made it pretty clear that his concern about the lack of security was for his gear, not his person ... and at that point it seems as though his gear was already destroyed, so it didn't really matter much
 
 and that doesn't change the fact that, as usual, you completely missed the point of this before you went off on some bizarre rant [/b]

A real punk smashes his own gear....
 
 BTW....when did I 'rant'?

[Frank Gallagher]

Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
   

Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
 Not to smart huh?

Sometimes the jokes write themselves... [/b]

...or sometimes just go way over peoples heads...

[Charlie Nakatestes, Japanese Golfer]

Why does this guy call himself a reatard anyway? Isn't that a tad inappropriate?

[nkotb]

It flows better than Jay Porky Midget.
 
 

Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
  Why does this guy call himself a reatard anyway? Isn't that a tad inappropriate?

[ggw]

Keith Richards -- pretty punk rock dude.

[ggw]

Jeff Tweedy -- pretty punk rock dude.

[Epstein]

Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
   

Originally posted by HoyaSaxa03:
     

Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
 Why add fuel to the fire by punching one of the overzealous fans, or kicking one off the stage if your concern is lack of security?

while i'm obviously not inside his head, jay made it pretty clear that his concern about the lack of security was for his gear, not his person ... and at that point it seems as though his gear was already destroyed, so it didn't really matter much
 
 and that doesn't change the fact that, as usual, you completely missed the point of this before you went off on some bizarre rant [/b]

A real punk smashes his own gear....
 
 BTW....when did I 'rant'? [/b]

a real punk tries to keep their gear to play another show...

[Frank Gallagher]

Originally posted by Epstein:
   

Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
   

Originally posted by HoyaSaxa03:
     

Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
 Why add fuel to the fire by punching one of the overzealous fans, or kicking one off the stage if your concern is lack of security?

while i'm obviously not inside his head, jay made it pretty clear that his concern about the lack of security was for his gear, not his person ... and at that point it seems as though his gear was already destroyed, so it didn't really matter much
 
 and that doesn't change the fact that, as usual, you completely missed the point of this before you went off on some bizarre rant [/b]

A real punk smashes his own gear....
 
 BTW....when did I 'rant'? [/b]

a real punk tries to keep their gear to play another show... [/b]

No they don't...they just live for the 'now'. Well the real punks back in the 70's and early 80's did anyway.

[BookerT]

dude, you realize the sex pistols were the 1970s UK version of a boy band, right? i mean, maybe they spat at people and did drugs, but they were the creation of a guy who sold overpriced bondage gear and named the band basically as an advertisement for his store. they made a great album and left their footprint on the music world and it's better for that, but to hold them up as some bastion of punk holiness is just laughable. they were just a bunch of blokes who took good advantage of opportunities, for about a year or so.

[Epstein]

Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
   

Originally posted by Epstein:
   

Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
     

Originally posted by HoyaSaxa03:
       

Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
 Why add fuel to the fire by punching one of the overzealous fans, or kicking one off the stage if your concern is lack of security?

while i'm obviously not inside his head, jay made it pretty clear that his concern about the lack of security was for his gear, not his person ... and at that point it seems as though his gear was already destroyed, so it didn't really matter much
 
 and that doesn't change the fact that, as usual, you completely missed the point of this before you went off on some bizarre rant [/b]

A real punk smashes his own gear....
 
 BTW....when did I 'rant'? [/b]

a real punk tries to keep their gear to play another show... [/b]

No they don't...they just live for the 'now'. Well the real punks back in the 70's and early 80's did anyway. [/b]

ask greg ginn that...pretty sure the first 4 years wasnt the only out put he want black flag to see

[ggw]

Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
   

Originally posted by Epstein:
   

Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
     

Originally posted by HoyaSaxa03:
       

Originally posted by 47 YEAR OLD VIRGIN:
 Why add fuel to the fire by punching one of the overzealous fans, or kicking one off the stage if your concern is lack of security?

while i'm obviously not inside his head, jay made it pretty clear that his concern about the lack of security was for his gear, not his person ... and at that point it seems as though his gear was already destroyed, so it didn't really matter much
 
 and that doesn't change the fact that, as usual, you completely missed the point of this before you went off on some bizarre rant [/b]

A real punk smashes his own gear....
 
 BTW....when did I 'rant'? [/b]

a real punk tries to keep their gear to play another show... [/b]

No they don't...they just live for the 'now'. Well the real punks back in the 70's and early 80's did anyway. [/b]

So did the hippies, dude.

[snailhook]

No they don't...they just live for the 'now'. Well the real punks back in the 70's and early 80's did anyway.[/b]

man, you're fucking clueless. way to break down an ambiguous and complex term into the most predictable cliche. you think wire and gang of four and the pop group had that attitude? robert quine of the voidoids or paul strummer would've booted some bitchass off the stage for stomping on their gear.
 
 besides, who's calling jay reatard punk anyway? even sloppy garage-rock musicians need their space to do their thing.