Author Topic: Music on YouTube  (Read 24849 times)

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Music on YouTube
« Reply #60 on: August 30, 2006, 03:02:00 pm »
The Mountain Goats
 "Woke Up New"
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bSdRizGYb0
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Music on YouTube
« Reply #61 on: September 01, 2006, 02:28:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Relaxer:
  This headline is an example of people forgetting what happened to the dot.coms in 2000/2001....
 
 Thus far there is no credible business plan for making it profitable.  
The trouble with YouTube
 
 Aug 31st 2006 | SAN FRANCISCO
 From The Economist print edition
 
 It attracts a lot of viewers, but can ??user-generated? video make money?
 
 ??STARBUCKS has comfy chairs, but they don't charge people for sitting in them,? says Tom McInerney, the boss and co-founder of Guba, an internet-video company. Instead, he explains, Starbucks provides a comfortable environment, at considerable expense, so that people will buy overpriced coffee. That, in essence, is the business model being pursued by websites that host ??user-generated content? such as personal blogs, photographs and today's craze, amateur videos, which can be uploaded and watched on sites such as YouTube, Google Video, MySpace, Guba, Veoh and Metacafe. By offering a setting for free interaction, such sites provide the online equivalent of comfy chairs. The trouble is that, so far, there is no equivalent of the overpriced coffee that brings in the money and pays the bills.
 
 That is why people like Chad Hurley and Steven Chen (pictured), the co-founders of YouTube, the clear leader of the pack by audience size, are casting around for a business model. Aware that inserting advertisements at the beginning of video clips, as some sites do, is annoying and risks driving away YouTube's users, Mr Hurley and Mr Chen have announced two experiments with advertising, with the promise of more to come. One idea is for ??brand channels? in which corporate customers create pages for their own promotional clips. Warner Brothers Records, a music label, led the way, setting up a page to promote a new album by Paris Hilton. The second experiment is ??participatory video ads?, whereby advertisements can be uploaded and then rated, shared and tagged just like amateur clips. This ??encourages engagement and participation,? the company declares.
 
 Even as advertisers evaluate these new ideas, however, YouTube and the other video-sharing sites face other difficulties. For one thing, they are in a no-man's land of copyright law: they promise to pull pirated content from their sites when asked to do so, but it is only a matter of time before one of them is hit with a big lawsuit. Then there are the costs of running such a site??video requires a lot of bandwidth and storage. A rival estimates that YouTube is losing more than $500,000 a month.
 
 Putting paid-for advertisements alongside amateur video clips, perhaps based on keywords or tags, poses another problem. ??How do you know the guy in a video doesn't make a racial slur?? asks Mr McInerney. Many firms will be cautious about letting an automatic system??such as, say, Google's AdSense??place their ads next to user-generated clips of unknown provenance and with potentially embarrassing contents. (Even so, Guba is testing AdSense for Video, which has not yet been officially launched.)
 
 For its part, Guba is betting on a combination of advertising plus the sale and rental of commercial video material. Its site offers both free amateur videos and paid-for content, including films from Sony and Warner Brothers. When Guba cut its prices last week, allowing new films to be downloaded for $9.99 and older ones for $4.99, its sales jumped tenfold. Google Video also allows content owners to charge for video. This suggests that internet-video sites are on a collision course with DVD-rental outfits, such as Netflix, which are moving towards the delivery of films via the internet, rather than as discs sent through the post.
 
 That, in turn, highlights another business model for the 200-odd internet-video sites. During the previous internet bubble, they would have rushed to list their shares as fast as they could; this time around, many will try to be bought by media conglomerates instead. Last week Sony, which has a large film studio and lots of video to promote, bought Grouper, a small video-sharing site, for $65m. And News Corporation, Rupert Murdoch's media conglomerate, is turning MySpace, its popular social-networking site, into a challenger to YouTube. Little wonder then that the founders of YouTube, Guba and other independent video sites go to great lengths to be quoted saying respectful things about other media moguls.
27>34

  • Guest
Re: Music on YouTube
« Reply #62 on: September 06, 2006, 06:22:00 pm »
POLYSICS - BlackOutFallOut
 
 ...check out that finger

SPARX

  • Member
  • Posts: 2070
Re: Music on YouTube
« Reply #63 on: September 07, 2006, 07:26:00 pm »
Anybody playing with this yet?
 http://www.singingfool.com/

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Music on YouTube
« Reply #64 on: September 13, 2006, 05:53:00 pm »
Looking forward to this video:
 
 Sixteen: old enough to be on MySpace, but not in this music video
 Posted by Denise Howell @ 10:11 am
 
 The Los Angeles Times reports that serveral music industry organizations, including Warner Music Group and Atlantic Records, are being sued by a sixteen-year-old girl who responded to a MySpace ad touting the opportunity to appear as an extra in a Buckcherry video.  According to the plaintiff, she was not carded but was given alcohol before her ensuing Girls Gone Wild-esque behavior was captured for posterity.  According to the band, she had to have presented a fake i.d. and falsified a release in order to participate.  According to the Los Angeles Times, "The Buckcherry situation is just the latest incident demonstrating how the Internet is erasing lines that once separated the private and the public."
 
 It's interesting that the role of MySpace is being underscored here, in what would appear to be an effort to leverage the negative press and fear surrounding minors' involvement with the site.  Presumably the same ad on the band's Web site or in local print publications would have achieved similar results, if not perhaps reaching as broad an audience.
 
 Meanwhile, the defendants' lawyers must be busy channeling Roy Scheider's Brody from Jaws:  You're gonna need a much better bouncer.
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Music on YouTube
« Reply #65 on: September 13, 2006, 06:20:00 pm »
Duh.
 
 MySpace may create rival for YouTube
 Silicon Valley/San Jose Business Journal - 10:35 AM PDT Wednesday
 
 On Tuesday, News Corp. Chief Operating Officer Peter Chernin told investors at the Merrill Lynch Media & Entertainment Conference in Pasadena that the company might create a rival for video Web site YouTube through News Corp.'s popular social networking site MySpace.com, according to media reports.
 
 Chernin told the group that he estimates that between 60 percent and 70 percent of San Mateo-based YouTube Inc.'s traffic comes through MySpace, and that any forays into video by MySpace would be in an effort to keep that traffic internal.
 
 Chernin also added that News Corp. will experimenting with offering some of its studio content on the Web via MySpace.
 
 "You're going to see us starting to play more aggressively on the entertainment side of that site," he told the group.
 
 MySpace.com is based in Santa Monica. It became part of the News Corp. (NYSE: NWS) conglomerate when the company bought MySpace's parent company, Los Angeles' Intermix Media, for $580 million.
27>34

Venerable Bede

  • Member
  • Posts: 3863
Re: Music on YouTube
« Reply #66 on: September 13, 2006, 07:06:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by vansmack:
  Looking forward to this video:
 
 Sixteen: old enough to be on MySpace, but not in this music video
 Posted by Denise Howell @ 10:11 am
 
i'm looking forward to the inevitable lonelygirl15 sex video.
OU812

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Music on YouTube
« Reply #67 on: September 13, 2006, 07:22:00 pm »
That TV on the Radio bit from Letterman made me think of another great Letterman appearance:
 
 At The Drive-In

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Music on YouTube
« Reply #68 on: September 14, 2006, 10:58:00 am »

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: Music on YouTube
« Reply #69 on: October 06, 2006, 05:41:00 pm »
Christy Mihos, an independent for Governor of Massachusetts.  You really need to see his first commercial:
 
 http://www.christy2006.com/pages/multimedia.cfm
27>34

terry

  • Member
  • Posts: 255
Re: Music on YouTube
« Reply #70 on: October 06, 2006, 06:30:00 pm »

SPARX

  • Member
  • Posts: 2070
Re: Music on YouTube
« Reply #71 on: October 06, 2006, 07:02:00 pm »

brennser

  • Member
  • Posts: 3758
Re: Music on YouTube
« Reply #72 on: October 10, 2006, 11:01:00 am »
the undertones in the studio recording teenage kicks
 
 fantastic stuff
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYg5c9EL7s0

SPARX

  • Member
  • Posts: 2070
Re: Music on YouTube
« Reply #73 on: October 10, 2006, 02:45:00 pm »

Relaxer

  • Member
  • Posts: 5409
Re: Music on YouTube
« Reply #74 on: October 13, 2006, 10:25:00 am »
oword