Author Topic: Garfunkel keeping hair on end...  (Read 8516 times)

walkman

  • Guest
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end...
« Reply #15 on: February 12, 2004, 07:55:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Rutherford J. Balls:
  I dunno, the AIDS epidemic tells me a few people have died from anal sex...
 
   
Quote
Originally posted by walkie hearts you all:
  have to agree with bags on both counts (pot and sodomy!)  truth is, we should work our asses off to get a little more like our neighbo(u)rs to the north.  They seem to understand that sex and drugs are none of the government's damn business, as long as no one gets hurt (and will someone please tell me when the last time someone died from a pot overdose, or a drinking and smoking accident?  let alone anal sex...)
[/b]
I somehow doubt that the actual act of anal intercourse has ever been responsible for a single death.  point is, unprotected sex with multiple partners, and the right to engage in homosexual expressions of love, are two entirely different things.

poorlulu

  • Guest
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end...
« Reply #16 on: February 12, 2004, 08:07:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by walkie hearts you all:
   someone died from a pot overdose
http://news.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/01/20/ncann20.xml
 
 The first confirmed pot death wasn't long ago......

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end...
« Reply #17 on: February 12, 2004, 08:19:00 pm »
http://www.oldfart.com/ftp/nachosstats/ctf/ctfweboutput/public_html/players/EBucknuts.html
 
 Apparently you are as likely to get killed by anal sex as you are by Elmer Fudd.

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8545
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end...
« Reply #18 on: February 12, 2004, 10:11:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by poorlulu:
   
Quote
Originally posted by walkie hearts you all:
   someone died from a pot overdose
http://news.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/01/20/ncann20.xml
 
 The first confirmed pot death wasn't long ago...... [/b]
"A man of 36 is believed to have become the first person in Britain to die directly from cannabis poisoning.
 
 Lee Maisey smoked six cannabis cigarettes a day for 11 years, an inquest heard. His death, which was registered as having been caused by cannabis toxicity, led to new warnings about the drug, which is due to be reclassified this month as a less dangerous one.
 
 "This type of death is extremely rare," Prof John Henry, a toxicologist at Imperial College, London, said after the inquest at Haverfordwest, west Wales."
 
 Yeah, but come on, you can probably die from Mentos if you have too many for too long.....

poorlulu

  • Guest
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end...
« Reply #19 on: February 12, 2004, 10:20:00 pm »
mmmmmmmm mentos......
 
 i'm not addicted...........i can quit anytime............
 
 sook,sook........crunch

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8545
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end...
« Reply #20 on: February 12, 2004, 11:01:00 pm »
Mentos are the BOMB.  They sell them in a box at Giant, and it's 70% more mentos than are in the roll, but take up about the same space in your purse.  Oh....yes....I think I need one now.

poorlulu

  • Guest
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end...
« Reply #21 on: February 12, 2004, 11:03:00 pm »
actually i'd sooner have the marijuana...............

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8545
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end...
« Reply #22 on: February 12, 2004, 11:48:00 pm »
except that it's illegal....    :p

paige

  • Guest
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end...
« Reply #23 on: February 13, 2004, 12:14:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by Bags:
  Mentos are the BOMB.  They sell them in a box at Giant, and it's 70% more mentos than are in the roll, but take up about the same space in your purse.  Oh....yes....I think I need one now.
mmmm mentos. fresh goes better.
 
 i agree with you bags. being passive can be just as bad as being too active. if someone doesn't like law, don't be a baby and sit around whining about it. at least try to make some headway. then if you fail you have a right to sit around and whine. while smoking/etc marijuana is illegal, it doesn't stop the large numbers of people who still smoke or sell it every single day. people have the right to do what they want to their own bodies. however, those scary anti drug commercials that say every time you buy weed you are supporting hairy guerrilla fighters in random countries makes me think about "the bigger picture," if there is such a thing...

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end...
« Reply #24 on: February 13, 2004, 12:16:00 am »
Why is pot illegal?
 
 Perhaps its because it is difficult to test if someone is under the influence whilst driving?

thirsty moore

  • Member
  • Posts: 6131
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end...
« Reply #25 on: February 13, 2004, 11:41:00 am »
We live in a very random world, don't we Paige.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by i do not heart winter:supporting hairy guerrilla fighters in random countries makes me think about "the bigger picture," if there is such a thing...

mankie

  • Guest
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end...
« Reply #26 on: February 13, 2004, 12:29:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Bags:
   
Quote
Originally posted by mankie:
     
Quote
Originally posted by Rob_Gee_a.k.a _Guiny:
 
Quote
If she cant blow whats the sense in having her?  [/b]
think it's a stupid law that you drive on the right side of the road over here, but do I go round driving on the left? [/b]
But, if it's important to you, you could work to get the law changed.  And there's nothing wrong with that... [/b]
Er, You were complaining because he was in court for doing something illegal....not for trying to change a law. I have no problem with trying to change laws, but while they are laws don't do it or expect to get prosecuted if you do and get caught.

mankie

  • Guest
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end...
« Reply #27 on: February 13, 2004, 12:32:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by poorlulu:
 
 
 sook,sook........crunch
You sook well darling  ;)  ...a bit iffie on the "crunch" at the end though!  :eek:

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8545
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end...
« Reply #28 on: February 13, 2004, 12:35:00 pm »
I was complaining because I think it's a stupid law, emphasized by the arrest of a guy in the back seat of a limo just hanging out doing nothing to no one no how...(since it's Garfunkel, I'm thinking it was really a Town Car...).
 
 I also hewed and cried over sentencing Tommy Chong to so much time for selling pot-related paraphenalia.  He wasn't changing the law, but how retarded is that law?!?
 
 [I'm not a NORML member or pot activist, but often these arrests strike me as so misguided and inane, with all that goes on in the world...it's just a distraction, or worse, a tool for deflection...]
 
  Free Tommy Chong!

mankie

  • Guest
Re: Garfunkel keeping hair on end...
« Reply #29 on: February 13, 2004, 01:00:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Bags:
  I was complaining because I think it's a stupid law, emphasized by the arrest of a guy in the back seat of a limo just hanging out doing nothing to no one no how...(since it's Garfunkel, I'm thinking it was really a Town Car...).
 
 I also hewed and cried over sentencing Tommy Chong to so much time for selling pot-related paraphenalia.  He wasn't changing the law, but how retarded is that law?!?
 
 [I'm not a NORML member or pot activist, but often these arrests strike me as so misguided and inane, with all that goes on in the world...it's just a distraction, or worse, a tool for deflection...]
 
  Free Tommy Chong!
I was just responding to your comment about me changing the law, when your original post was not about changing the law, it was about a "stupid law".
 
 I disagree with you though, drugs and selling them should be illegal, and those who commit these crimes should be in the pokie.
 
 HOWEVER! I'd rather guns be illegal than pot, but evidently it's okay to have a product in your possession who's SOLE PURPOSE is for injuring or killing, but not for okay for some stoner to smoke dis shit.