Originally posted by J'Mal:
this is a disaster and an embarrasment for DC.
Sorry, pouring tax payer money into more government kofi-annan type DC programs is not going to reinvigorate that or any other neighborhood.
Luring **business** to the District, and actual consumers who spend money that can then be taxed, THAT is the only way to fix what is wrong with the city.
This was going to be funded by a gross receipts tax on the largest businesses in DC. It doesn't come out of general revenue or anything else. It's not as though, without baseball, that money is available to be spent on something else.
Fact is, baseball wants to sell the expos/nationals, and they cannot do that if Linda Cropp adds $300 million to the team's price tag.
This was a win-win for the city and for baseball. Baseball could unload the expos. The city gets it money back, and more, because suddenly there are 20, 30, 40 thousand people from the burbs coming to ANACOSTIA for crissakes to spend money at least 80 times a year.
Baseball will now take its team to a city that understands simple concepts like investment and capitalism. The neighborhood where the stadium and all of its attendant social benefits would have gone, will remain a socialist shithole, congratulating cropp for sticking it to "fat cats" and whitey. The city is a joke.
ok. . i don't understand anything you said. . .first off, every dc-govt. run project is gonna be an embarrassment, and i agree. . .if there's a private financier who wants to build a team, great. however, the team will be sold, along with the stadium. . .if there's no stadium, then there's no way baseball can sell the team.
secondly. . how do you propose getting business to move to anacostia without a baseball stadium? with a stadium in anacostia, you have at least 1/2 of the people in attendence coming from outside of d.c., and d.c. finally gets to tax them.
d.c. general revenue is a sham. . all the lottery proceeds goes to d.c.'s general revenue fund, and not specially allocated education funds. . .wanna harp on d.c. not doing enough for schools, start there, not the stadium.
as for where the expos can go now? well, there are no other cities that have come up with a private financing option, and d.c. was the only one to even come up with anything remotely viable for construction of a stadium, public or privately financed. baseball cannot sell the expos without a) a home and b) a stadium.
so, i'm sorry j'mal, but each of your statements contradict each other. .you might wanna clarify what you are talking about, because i can't understand if you are for or against the stadium.