Now you guys are rubbing salt….
Well might as well pile on, right?
I'm not one to pay hundreds of dollars for any show....since to me there are enough good $30 and under shows to never bother with shows that cost hundreds. Hence, I've never seen the Who. And I'm ok with that. I'm not a completist when it comes to having to see every great band ever.
But when I checked Stubhub at 7:10 and saw that I could get a ticket for $16.45, fees lncluded, I figured, "Why not?" So I quit my planned cooking and ate a tv dinner and jumped into the car and I was in my seat five minutes before showtime.
So I've never seen The Who, so don't have any past Who shows to compare it to. I've also never seem the Beatlles of the Stones, so cant' compare to that either. I did once see the Ramones, but that was 30 years ago and I don't remember much of it. And I did once see Ray Davies solo doing some Kinks songs at a festival. Well, this was better than that.
But was it any better than Arlo Parks ($15) at Union Stage? Or Sierra Ferrell ($15) at Union Stage? Or Old 97's ($35) at Hamilton? Or Spoon ($45) at the Club? Not really? It was probably better than Haim ($21) at Anthem.
I haven't seen other Who shows, so can't compare it to other Who shows. But I bet it wasn't better than this show.
https://www.setlist.fm/setlist/the-who/1989/glens-falls-civic-center-glens-falls-ny-63d4367f.htmlApparently, the Who played my little (capacity 4800) hometown hockey arena in 1989 as a warmup for a tour with much larger venues on the schedule. 41 songs. I wonder how many hours that translates to? Anyway, I missed it, because I was living in London, bumping into Nick Cave at his booksigning and seeing the Cure, the Pixies, the Butthole Surfers, a bunch of great ska shows, and hanging out at the Fridge in Brixton.