So we recently watched Love and Mercy, and my wife couldn't stop commenting on how badly punk rock sucks when compared to real musicians like Brian Wilson.
Me, I'm sort of neutral regarding punk. I went to hardcore shows in the late 80's more for the scene than the music. I have the Sex Pistols and Dead Kennedys on my ipod but never listen to them anymore.
Does anybody have a musicological defense of punk based on musical merit alone?
I really loved that movie, but alas I am a major Beach Boys nerd and 60's nerd in general. I'm struck by how multi-talented many bands were back then...ie so many bands seemed to have multiple members that could really play and really sing. Not sure we see that as much any more.
But.
I'm still love punk rock through and through. I went to tons of show mid 80's through late 80s too...to me that music is all aobut the guts and the aggro. Some holds up better than others of course, but I still rock the Misfits, Germs, Discharge, Bad Brains, Clash, etc etc etc on the regular.