Author Topic: Musicological banter  (Read 1189806 times)


Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3181 on: June 10, 2023, 08:38:50 am »
Fuck…but sounds like he caught it early


Mike Ness of Social Distortion diagnosed with stage one cancer
slack

Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3182 on: June 18, 2023, 01:42:20 pm »
never heard this story, but love that Patti Smith punched the Nudge for making a homophobic comment 45 years ago

45 Years Ago: Patti Smith Punches Ted Nugent on Live Radio

 https://ultimateclassicrock.com/ted-nugent-patti-smith-fight
slack

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 15250
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3183 on: June 21, 2023, 10:22:24 am »
Gotta a spare cool million laying about?  then you too could own the RARESET Van Halen CD EVER

Van Halen RAREST CD EVER ONLY KNOWN COPY ONE OF A KIND FACTORY ERROR MISPRINT

"After in-depth Inquiries, research and communication with multiple music collecting sources, it’s been determined that this may indeed be one of the rarest rock collectibles to be made available to the public."

https://www.ebay.com/itm/324938955762?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-127632-2357-0&ssspo=vchpmPVxSUi&sssrc=2047675&ssuid=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY

because never in the course of CD manufacturing has a disc not had the label printed on it   ::)
T.Rex

hutch

  • Member
  • Posts: 3677
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3184 on: June 21, 2023, 10:48:28 am »
Hilarious. Obviously someone having a laugh

Justin Tonation

  • Member
  • Posts: 5388
  • Did you ever wonder?
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3185 on: June 21, 2023, 02:16:55 pm »
Happy 75th Birthday to the LP, the invention that elevated 33 1/3 to The Pantheon of Famous Numbers That Are Not Integers.
😐 🎶

Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3186 on: June 21, 2023, 05:23:39 pm »
never knew this was Jason's origin story

Then, at the age of 22, his moment arrived. A member of the Drive-By Truckers, a band that had returned to its home in the Shoals to play a breakthrough house concert for Spin magazine, failed to show up for the gig. As a result, Isbell got a rapid field promotion onto the stage. He joined the band for the show and then departed on tour with the band for the next six years.


https://www.npr.org/2023/06/21/1183194069/jason-isbell-weathervanes-profile
slack

Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3187 on: July 03, 2023, 08:19:54 pm »
Somehow in 2023 I just learned that Tony Visconti produced TRex's  albums

then (and performed on) the man who sold the world (this I knew)
Oddly though did NOT produce Ziggy and that's the most Bolan record Bowie did

Tony may have had a lot more to do with glam rock fuzz than I'd previously thought.

« Last Edit: July 03, 2023, 08:23:03 pm by SideH@tchıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llıl »
slack

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 15250
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3188 on: July 11, 2023, 09:49:31 am »
I guess this goes to show the power of a great pop/rock song...

I own no Elton John albums, never seen him in concert and yet I know far more of his hits then one would expect.  So only exposure would be 70s/80s radio, TV and probably movies. 
T.Rex

hutch

  • Member
  • Posts: 3677
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3189 on: July 11, 2023, 10:08:08 am »
It shows the power of a popular song when rock was king. They were in the air back then….


grateful

  • Member
  • Posts: 10338
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3190 on: July 11, 2023, 10:23:34 am »
It shows the power of a popular song when rock was young. They were in the air back then….



FTFY

hutch

  • Member
  • Posts: 3677
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3191 on: July 11, 2023, 10:28:33 am »
I don’t agree with that….popular music just had a different role in daily life back then….very unifying…now popular music is just not that popular…it’s audience is very fragmented…

Curiously, live music has never been more popular

grateful

  • Member
  • Posts: 10338
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3192 on: July 11, 2023, 10:39:29 am »
It shows the power of a popular song when rock was young. They were in the air back then….



FTFY

It was funny because its a reference to an Elton John song.

hutch

  • Member
  • Posts: 3677
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3193 on: July 11, 2023, 10:44:59 am »
Oh ok

Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28970
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: Musicological banter
« Reply #3194 on: July 11, 2023, 10:52:49 am »
I own no Elton John albums, never seen him in concert and yet I know far more of his hits then one would expect.  So only exposure would be 70s/80s radio, TV and probably movies.
Grocery stores, man. Elton John is a top-3 grocery store artist all-time. Arguably #2 behind just Mariah Carey.
LVMH