Author Topic: The MLB Thread  (Read 703948 times)

i am gay and i like cats

  • Guest
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1140 on: April 06, 2015, 09:07:37 pm »
mister shit,lord . . .  are you, normal, in this thread?

Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28932
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1141 on: April 06, 2015, 09:09:35 pm »
mister shit,lord . . .  are you, normal, in this thread?
What do you mean by "normal"? Are you asking if I'm a regular contributor to this thread or something else?
LVMH

stevewizzle

  • Guest
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1142 on: April 07, 2015, 12:08:04 pm »
Mike Trout is on pace for 546 strikeouts this season, poised to crush the previous record of 223 set by Mark Reynolds.

stevewizzle

  • Guest
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1143 on: April 08, 2015, 10:43:44 am »
Red Sox extend Porcello.  4 years, $82.5m.

 
$20mil+ per year? That seems... high.

i don't have an opinion on this yet.  it seems way too high and nothing in his stats suggest he deserves it.  am i missing something?

Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28932
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1144 on: April 08, 2015, 10:58:35 am »
i don't have an opinion on this yet.  it seems way too high and nothing in his stats suggest he deserves it.  am i missing something?
I sort of feel I'm missing something too. I really like Porcello, but he's a #2/3 guy, he's not a staff's ace. His pitching is highly dependent on groundballs and having competent infield defense. That's worth 20million per? Am I just that out of it as far as what the market is going for for a #2/3 pitcher?

To the deal's credit, he's only 26 so it's not like he's going to age out of this 4 year deal and be far out of his prime in year 3 and 4.
LVMH

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1145 on: April 08, 2015, 12:22:26 pm »
You don't think Rick Porcello deserves to be the highest paid pitcher in Red Sox history?

Me neither, and I love the guy.  I've been hoping Anaheim would trade for him or he'd be in Anaheim by next season.  But if that's the going rate for less years/more money deals (they offered less money per year in his 4 year deal), then I'm happy with Heaney, Tropeano and Skaggs.  It does make me wonder what Richards is going to cost though...
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1146 on: April 08, 2015, 12:27:30 pm »
Nice to see small market teams holding on to their guys.

Pirates extend Josh Harrison 4 years,  $27.5m with two club options for 2019-20.
27>34

Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28932
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1147 on: April 08, 2015, 12:28:15 pm »
You don't think Rick Porcello deserves to be the highest paid pitcher in Red Sox history?
HOT SPORTS TAKE
LVMH

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1148 on: April 08, 2015, 12:33:23 pm »
HOT SPORTS TAKE

I was going for hyperbole. but yeah.
27>34

hutch

  • Guest
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1149 on: April 08, 2015, 01:06:33 pm »
last night. turning on the dodgers game on MLB Network.....the mellifluous tones of Vin Scully swam over me.......ahhhhhhhhhhhh...peace...

too bad i only made it three innings

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1150 on: April 08, 2015, 01:27:20 pm »
Last night Vinnie Gem: "I'm absolutely amazed about the beards. I can remember when the No. 1 sponsor for the World Series was Gillette."
27>34

Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28932
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1151 on: April 08, 2015, 04:47:51 pm »
Tigers are on-pace for their pitching staff to throw 162 combined shutouts this season. Would be a record.
LVMH

stevewizzle

  • Guest
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1152 on: April 08, 2015, 06:17:03 pm »
Last night Vinnie Gem: "I'm absolutely amazed about the beards. I can remember when the No. 1 sponsor for the World Series was Gillette."

there was also that moment when (i think) joc pederson struck out, and his remark was something along the lines of "joc pederson, who led the team in batting in spring training which we all know means nothing, goes down swinging".

stevewizzle

  • Guest
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1153 on: April 08, 2015, 06:19:25 pm »
i don't have an opinion on this yet.  it seems way too high and nothing in his stats suggest he deserves it.  am i missing something?
I sort of feel I'm missing something too. I really like Porcello, but he's a #2/3 guy, he's not a staff's ace. His pitching is highly dependent on groundballs and having competent infield defense. That's worth 20million per? Am I just that out of it as far as what the market is going for for a #2/3 pitcher?

To the deal's credit, he's only 26 so it's not like he's going to age out of this 4 year deal and be far out of his prime in year 3 and 4.

friends traded about 15 emails this morning trying to make sense of it.  the best we could come up with is better to lock someone down from 26-30, rather than sign someone to the same deal, same money at 29.  we also sent around the phillies roster and owed salaries for 2015, so that made us feel better.

stevewizzle

  • Guest
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #1154 on: April 08, 2015, 06:20:48 pm »
You don't think Rick Porcello deserves to be the highest paid pitcher in Red Sox history?

Me neither, and I love the guy.  I've been hoping Anaheim would trade for him or he'd be in Anaheim by next season.  But if that's the going rate for less years/more money deals (they offered less money per year in his 4 year deal), then I'm happy with Heaney, Tropeano and Skaggs.  It does make me wonder what Richards is going to cost though...

don't you have like 4 years and another tommy john surgery before you have to worry about that?

also, come to seattle for a game and say hi.  we can go to a wine bar or something.