Author Topic: The MLB Thread  (Read 705278 times)


hutch

  • Guest
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #2146 on: March 01, 2019, 12:25:18 pm »
This is actually not really that stupid of a contract by the Phillies. What's the tax going to be in 2030? 22mil is going to be, like, 14 mil today.

I think it’s a stupid contract by Harper

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #2147 on: March 01, 2019, 01:36:47 pm »
Hey.  Bonilla getting paid past Harper

The Nats offer had deferred money of up to $100m.  They would have been paying Harper until he was 60....
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #2148 on: March 01, 2019, 01:39:19 pm »

I think there will be a DH in the NL by the time Harper is 30.


Been hearing this since I was a kid.  Really don't think it happens unless there is a strike and it's the isuue that breaks the deadlock.  Don't think there is enough player support for that.
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #2149 on: March 02, 2019, 04:03:45 pm »
Harper opts not to wear 34 as a Phillie - says Halladay should be the last to wear 34.  First classy thing I've seen the kid do.
27>34

hutch

  • Guest
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #2150 on: March 02, 2019, 09:22:59 pm »
Maybe the team told him he should not wear 34

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3332
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #2151 on: March 03, 2019, 11:19:19 am »
While the Giants offer was easy to walk away from (12 years, $310m) the Dodgers offer was not:

4 years, $180m.  I probably would have taken that, but Boras probably wouldn't let him.

I can't believe he passed on the Dodgers offer just to get the largest overall contract.  Plus 13 years in Philly.

hutch

  • Guest
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #2152 on: March 03, 2019, 11:37:04 am »
Hell despite higher taxes I would have thought being in San Francisco would have ensured a much higher quality of life.....so near his hometown, spring training in Az etc



vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #2153 on: March 03, 2019, 12:49:05 pm »
I can't believe he passed on the Dodgers offer just to get the largest overall contract.  Plus 13 years in Philly.

Neither can I.  Trout is likely to beat that $330m number in  2 years, hopefully sooner for Angels fans, but no one is going to touch $45m AAV for a VERY long time.
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #2154 on: March 19, 2019, 10:28:00 am »
Angels extend Trout, 4 years, $430m
27>34

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3332
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #2155 on: March 19, 2019, 10:48:04 am »
Angels extend Trout, 4 years, $430m


You meant 12 years.

Julian, Bespoke SEXPERT

  • Member
  • Posts: 28932
  • 11x MVP, 1st Posts, HoF, Certified Weblebrity
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #2156 on: March 19, 2019, 11:00:19 am »
Angels extend Trout, 4 years, $430m


You meant 12 years.
Still a wild contract. Wowza.
LVMH

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #2157 on: March 19, 2019, 11:27:10 am »
Angels extend Trout, 4 years, $430m


You meant 12 years.

Sorry, yes.  Was in a hurry to get out the door.
27>34

shemptiness

  • Member
  • Posts: 3332
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #2158 on: March 19, 2019, 11:58:39 am »
Angels extend Trout, 4 years, $430m


You meant 12 years.

Sorry, yes.  Was in a hurry to get out the door.
So 27 > 34 still

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: The MLB Thread
« Reply #2159 on: March 19, 2019, 12:02:03 pm »
So 27 > 34 still

Always.

And 27 > 3 now too. 
27>34