Author Topic: Paul Westerberg  (Read 9656 times)

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8540
Re: Paul Westerberg
« Reply #30 on: May 02, 2005, 12:43:00 pm »
Though, it was a 2.5 hour show, so there will still lots of Paul highlights to make for a great show.   ;)

Bartelby

  • Member
  • Posts: 712
Re: Paul Westerberg
« Reply #31 on: May 02, 2005, 01:42:00 pm »
Bags, that was a very nice review - and I agree with the cover songs...only the lyrics gave 'em away - certainly not the melodies.  It WAS a considerate, friendly crowd - and VERY FEW SMOKERS!!! Even 930 staff commented on the relatively clean air!

twangirl

  • Member
  • Posts: 689
Re: Paul Westerberg
« Reply #32 on: May 02, 2005, 02:53:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Mobius:
   Definitely time for a reunion w/ Tommy Stinson . . . although I liked the bassist he's with now.
 
It's Jim Boquist, who played with Son Volt. It sure was great to see him up onstage again, and his harmony vocals were always top-notch.
 
 I was also disappointed that Paul let "Andrew" sing two of what would have been major highlights in the set, but at the same time it was so typical of Paul to pull something like that, it really took me back to Replacements shows I saw at the old 9:30 where they were literally falling down drunk and playing all covers instead of their own songs. So the "Andrew incident" was just in the spirit of the old days to me.

mtruslow

  • Member
  • Posts: 1
Re: Paul Westerberg
« Reply #33 on: November 13, 2005, 04:33:00 am »
Thank you!!!!  Someone who "gets it".......a brilliant train wreck....loved the show and found it on Dime two days later in fantastic quality.  Mark T.

  • Guest
Re: Paul Westerberg
« Reply #34 on: November 13, 2005, 11:28:00 am »
<img src="http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y25/team_dupek/51178e3e.jpg" alt=" - " />