I guess my question is, then why does something like Coachella (not cheap) draw people from all over the place? Lollapalooza had a pretty phenomenal line-up...not as big as Coachella, but hey, I thought it was pretty decent. It was hard to say no to Lolla's ticket price. I know that some of us are getting older, but it really makes me question then, what are the people who listened to Pearl Jam and Nirvana listening to now? Are they listening to music at all? I actually know a lot of people that are just not as into music now compared to when they were younger, but it makes me question if they were ever passionate about it to begin with. It's tough to keep up sometimes with a lot of the newer bands, it takes work. I dunno. I scratch my head because clearly there is an audience out there. When you have 50,000 people singing along to the Pixies, and 12 years ago you would have NEVER have gotten that number, I guess it makes me question Seth's comments a little bit. A band like Radiohead, which sells out 20,000 seat arenas in the U.S. is hardly accessible. So there is an audience there. I would venture to guess that the average Radiohead fan owns at least one record by the Smiths, Sonic Youth, PJ Harvey, or the Flaming Lips...and a very good chance they own a lot more. Anyway, I guess I have a lot of unanswered questions. There is more to the Lolla thing than people just not being into alternative music anymore...maybe we're just getting older and we've already seen those bands enough (I've seen Morrissey twice, Sonic Youth about 8 times, and PJ Harvey 3 times), and the thought of an all-day outdoor venue isn't conducive to bands like Sonic Youth and PJ Harvey. Perhaps we'd rather see them in a more intimate venue where we can drink our beers, smoke and view them in the kind of setting we're happier in. Who knows.