Author Topic: We need a baseball thread dont we?  (Read 38603 times)

Guiny

  • Guest
Re: We need a baseball thread dont we?
« Reply #60 on: October 11, 2005, 12:57:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by [username edited by p.c. moderator]:
 Well then you should be accusing the Anaheim Angels and Chicago White Sox of rampant homosexuality since unlike your precious overpaid pieces o' shite, they're still playing. [/QB]
Why should I be doing that? The better teams won, I even gave congrats to Vansmack and not calling his teams players gay because they were better. Why not call Beltran gay? He's overpaid also along with probably 100 other guys in the league.

Julian, Alleged Computer F**kface

  • Member
  • Posts: 5970
  • JULIAN'S AMERICA - It makes my taco pop!
Re: We need a baseball thread dont we?
« Reply #61 on: October 11, 2005, 12:59:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Rob_Gee:
  Why not call Beltran gay?  
Well the fact that he's not a nancy boy who runs like he's holding a purse has alot to do with it.

Guiny

  • Guest
Re: We need a baseball thread dont we?
« Reply #62 on: October 11, 2005, 01:02:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by [username edited by p.c. moderator]:
 Well the fact that he's not a nancy boy who runs like he's holding a purse has alot to do with it. [/QB]
Did he even run the bases enough times to determine that fact?

Sage 703

  • Member
  • Posts: 1710
Re: We need a baseball thread dont we?
« Reply #63 on: October 11, 2005, 01:18:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Xavier Bush, Power Forward:
  Nice job by Sonick. 0 for 4 in the first round. Meanwhile, I was 4 for 4, thanks very much.
 
   
Quote
Originally posted by sonickteam, forum nice guy:
  i am going to pick too
 
  Red Sox in 3
  Yankees in 4
  Padres in 5
  Braves in 4
 
  Red Sox in 6
  Braves in 7
 
  Braves in 6
 
  MVP - Andruw Jones
[/b]
I was 3 of 4.  Go White Sox.

Venerable Bede

  • Member
  • Posts: 3863
Re: We need a baseball thread dont we?
« Reply #64 on: October 11, 2005, 01:19:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Rob_Gee:
   
Quote
Originally posted by [username edited by p.c. moderator]:
 Well the fact that he's not a nancy boy who runs like he's holding a purse has alot to do with it. [/b]
Did he even run the bases enough times to determine that fact? [/QB]
like i read somewhere, a-rod is the most dangerous hitter in baseball when his team is up by 5 runs.
OU812

Guiny

  • Guest
Re: We need a baseball thread dont we?
« Reply #65 on: October 11, 2005, 02:33:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Venerable Bede:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Rob_Gee:
   
Quote
Originally posted by [username edited by p.c. moderator]:
 Well the fact that he's not a nancy boy who runs like he's holding a purse has alot to do with it. [/b]
Did he even run the bases enough times to determine that fact? [/b]
like i read somewhere, a-rod is the most dangerous hitter in baseball when his team is up by 5 runs. [/QB]
Actually, there was an article out there that was talking about how that is so last year. He was a very good clutch hitter this year. I knew I should have saved it. I mean he was no David Ortiz when it came to clutch, but he was a billion times better than he was last year.

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: We need a baseball thread dont we?
« Reply #66 on: October 11, 2005, 02:48:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Rob_Gee:
  I mean he was no David Ortiz
exactly.
 
  but lets see who get that MVP award.....

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: We need a baseball thread dont we?
« Reply #67 on: October 11, 2005, 02:54:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Rob_Gee:
   Why not call Beltran gay?  
cause it doesnt get anyone all upset...thats why  ;)

Guiny

  • Guest
Re: We need a baseball thread dont we?
« Reply #68 on: October 11, 2005, 03:09:00 pm »
A-Rod will get it because the Yank's won the division even though they had the same record, he is a positioned player and I believe (but not positive) he led in more offensive catagories. At least we know Bonds will not win it in the NL, that is a good thing.

muschi

  • Guest
Re: We need a baseball thread dont we?
« Reply #69 on: October 12, 2005, 08:52:00 am »

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: We need a baseball thread dont we?
« Reply #70 on: October 12, 2005, 11:37:00 pm »
Complete bullshit.  So many things were wrong with that play, starting with the umpire calling him out, then lying about it.
 
 We were wronged.
 
 Fortunately for all of you, I will have nothing more to say.
27>34

vansmack

  • Member
  • Posts: 19722
Re: We need a baseball thread dont we?
« Reply #71 on: October 13, 2005, 02:03:00 am »
Having now watched the entire game over charting the umpires patterns for calling a strike out:
 
 Nearly every strike out was called with the unpires right arm sticking out first, then the pumped fist signaling the out sign. Only Carl Everett's strike out in the 6th and Q's strikeout in the 7th were called differently.
 
 Five other third strikes hit the dirt prior to the ninth inning.  In the four times the batter was out (GA in the second was called a foul tip), the umpire did not make the last fist pump signifying an out until after the catcher tagged the batter with the ball.  Even two batters prior to Pierzynski, Aaron Rowand swung at a ball in the dirt and the umpire did not pump his fist until after the catcher tagged the batter.  
 
 This is in stark contrast to how the umpire handled the last out in the ninth, where he pumped his fist as did for every other strike out that did not hit the dirt.  
 
 If the umpire thought the ball hit the ground, he wouldn't (or shouldn't) have made the out call until Josh Paul tagged the runner, as he did every other dropped third strike in the game.        
 
 Amazing.
 
 You can watch for yourself:
 
 Garrett Anderson in the second
 Bengie Mo in the 6th
 Konerko in the 6th
 Konerko in the 8th
 Rowand in the 9th
27>34

Guiny

  • Guest
Re: We need a baseball thread dont we?
« Reply #72 on: October 13, 2005, 08:26:00 am »
I feel for you Vansmack, that was definetely one of those plays you never expected to see. I personally thought he caught the ball. But even if he didn't, an out call was made. Of course, their will be people on here that say bad calls happen all the time so deal with it.......But that one just hurt for you I know.

sonickteam2

  • Guest
Re: We need a baseball thread dont we?
« Reply #73 on: October 13, 2005, 10:13:00 am »
at least you werent playing the Yankees...

Venerable Bede

  • Member
  • Posts: 3863
Re: We need a baseball thread dont we?
« Reply #74 on: October 13, 2005, 10:44:00 am »
paging don denkinger. . .
OU812