Author Topic: naming the band  (Read 5947 times)

chaz

  • Member
  • Posts: 5111
  • este lugar es una mierda
Re: naming the band
« Reply #30 on: September 29, 2008, 02:00:00 pm »
At this particular moment....you.   :D  
 
 OK, make that 40%.
 
 Actually I hate all band names right now.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
 
 
  So you like 2.5 of them? Is it "Clubs" or "Bells" that is bothering you?
 
   
Quote
Originally posted by chaz:
  Names we're considering so far:
 
 Clubs and Bells
 Rx
 The Prescriptions (though i'm sure this has been used)
 The Downy Sins (or Downy Sins)
 The Sevens
 
 personally, i like about 1/2 this list.
[/b]

thirsty moore

  • Member
  • Posts: 6131
Re: naming the band
« Reply #31 on: September 29, 2008, 02:01:00 pm »
I vote for Downy Sins.

Bombay Chutney

  • Member
  • Posts: 3956
Re: naming the band
« Reply #32 on: September 29, 2008, 02:08:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by chaz:
 
 The Sevens
 
Taken

chaz

  • Member
  • Posts: 5111
  • este lugar es una mierda
Re: naming the band
« Reply #33 on: September 29, 2008, 02:11:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Bombay Chutney:
   
Quote
Originally posted by chaz:
 
 The Sevens
 
Taken [/b]
I've never even heard of those guys...
 This name was pretty much out of the running anyway, it' also the name of some Boston based celtic band.
 
 So much for my tribute to arthur lee...

Re: naming the band
« Reply #34 on: September 29, 2008, 02:19:00 pm »
You could go with "Arsonist" or "Girlfriend Beater".
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by chaz:
 
 
 So much for my tribute to arthur lee...

chaz

  • Member
  • Posts: 5111
  • este lugar es una mierda
Re: naming the band
« Reply #35 on: September 29, 2008, 02:25:00 pm »
Or I could always go with "The Porky Midgets".
 
 Or maybe "The Breastfeeding Six Year Olds"
 
 Those are both sounding really nice...
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
  You could go with "Arsonist" or "Girlfriend Beater".
 
   
Quote
Originally posted by chaz:
 
 
 So much for my tribute to arthur lee...
[/b]

Re: naming the band
« Reply #36 on: September 29, 2008, 02:37:00 pm »
Nice!
 
 I really like the first one, I wish I had thought of it.
 
 The second one, well that's probably a couple of years beyond what is average for the world.
 
 http://parenting.families.com/blog/breastfeeding-how-long-is-too-long
 
 
 You've probably laughed at the humorous jabs in movies and sitcoms aimed at the idea of breastfeeding "older" children. But if you are enjoying a breastfeeding relationship with your infant, at some point you will start to consider whether or when you should wean your child.
 
 You might be surprised to learn that the worldwide average length of breastfeeding each child is about 4 years. This is because many societies encourage children to continue breastfeeding until they wean themselves. For many nations, this is an economical and nutritional lifesaver for the family as water is often polluted, formula is way beyond what a family can afford and refrigeration is scarce. But what about in more industrialized societies?
 
 
 In the last century, a trend existed that equated wealth with baby formula - or more aptly - poverty with breastfeeding. Because of this trend, parents used to aspire to formula-feed their babies for higher social stature. In the last few decades, however, scientists have learned that breast milk is far superior to anything man can make to imitate it and that, besides its nutritional benefits, the act of breastfeeding itself provides benefits to the child and health benefits to the mother. Now, it seems, the pendulum has swung back in favor of Mother Nature! Breast is best. Lower percentages of breastfed infants are now considered to be a national and global problem in urgent need of resolution! But is there such a thing as too much of a good thing?
 
 
 The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that all babies be breastfed exclusively - that is without pacifiers, formula, solid foods or other liquids - for the first six months of life and that, after solid food is introduced, breastfeeding should continue for a minimum of the first 12 months of life and, thereafter as long as is mutually beneficial to Mother and Child. They also suggest that "there is no upper limit to the duration of breastfeeding and no evidence of psychological or developmental harm from breastfeeding into the third year of life or longer" (AAP 2005).
 
 The American Academy of Family Physicians issued a position statement on breastfeeding which recommends: "Breastfeeding beyond the first year offers considerable benefits to both mother and child, and should continue as long as mutually desired." They also note that "If the child is younger than two years of age, the child is at increased risk of illness if weaned." (AAFP 2001)
 
 The World Health Organization also recommends "exclusive breastfeeding for six months as a global public health recommendation, taking into account the findings of the WHO expert consultation on optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding, and to provide safe and appropriate complementary foods, with continued breastfeeding for up to two years of age or beyond, exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life with continued breastfeeding for at least 2 years" (WHO 2002)
 
 2004 Health Canada Recommendation on Exclusive Breastfeeding Duration says "Exclusive breastfeeding is recommended for the first six months of life for healthy term infants, as breast milk is the best food for optimal growth. Infants should be introduced to nutrient-rich, solid foods with particular attention to iron at six months with continued breastfeeding for up to two years and beyond."
 
 These are just some of the well respected leaders in the area of health and wellness who all agree that breastfeeding for as long as both Mother and Baby find beneficial is exactly the right amount of time.
 
 The answer, then, is no. There is no such thing as too much of a good thing when it comes to the healthy extended breastfeeding relationship between Mother and Child.
 
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by chaz:
  Or I could always go with "The Porky Midgets".
 
 Or maybe "The Breastfeeding Six Year Olds"
 
 Those are both sounding really nice...
 
   
Quote
Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
  You could go with "Arsonist" or "Girlfriend Beater".
 
   
Quote
Originally posted by chaz:
 
 
 So much for my tribute to arthur lee...
[/b]
[/b]

chaz

  • Member
  • Posts: 5111
  • este lugar es una mierda
Re: naming the band
« Reply #37 on: September 29, 2008, 03:01:00 pm »
Just the link would have been fine, thanks.
 
 And didn't you post that manifesto in another thread already?
 
 If everyone just gave birth to their kids underwater in birthing tubs we wouldn't have these sorts of problems.

Re: naming the band
« Reply #38 on: September 29, 2008, 03:07:00 pm »
I don't think I posted that one. That's actually the first time I've read about a worldwide average of four years.
 
 I'm not sure of the effectiveness of birthing tubs. However, if everyone with a low risk pregnancy gave birth at home or in birthing centers, the rate of unneccessary c-sections would be drastically reduced.

chaz

  • Member
  • Posts: 5111
  • este lugar es una mierda
Re: naming the band
« Reply #39 on: September 29, 2008, 03:09:00 pm »
We did birthing tubs and both my kids could swim at 8 weeks.  
 
 CASE CLOSED.

Arthwys

  • Member
  • Posts: 623
Re: naming the band
« Reply #40 on: September 29, 2008, 07:52:00 pm »
I always liked the sound of..
 
 When Vegans Turn Cannibal!
Emrys

thirsty moore

  • Member
  • Posts: 6131
Re: naming the band
« Reply #41 on: October 07, 2008, 10:42:00 am »
Did you decide on a band name?

Re: naming the band
« Reply #42 on: October 07, 2008, 10:46:00 am »
I'll bet they went with When Vegans Turn Cannibal!  
Quote
Originally posted by econo:
  Did you decide on a band name?

chaz

  • Member
  • Posts: 5111
  • este lugar es una mierda
Re: naming the band
« Reply #43 on: October 07, 2008, 11:13:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by econo:
  Did you decide on a band name?
Funny not yet..we got together last night and still no name, hopefully the lightning bolt will strike...
 
 We may just call ourselves The Worries, which was the first name we came up with that we all liked, but somehow got swept aside.

chaz

  • Member
  • Posts: 5111
  • este lugar es una mierda
Re: naming the band
« Reply #44 on: October 07, 2008, 12:27:00 pm »
And the new name of the day is....
 
 The Graves
 
 Been used by some small time bands i found on myspace but they've been inactive for a few years now.
 
 But I think I like The Worries better.