Author Topic: Old 97's roll call  (Read 10249 times)

Re: Old 97's roll call
« Reply #15 on: July 09, 2004, 02:17:00 pm »
yes. will be the best 5 bucks you spend this month.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by MET:
  Never heard of these guys before.  Is it worth going?

Sailor Ripley

  • Guest
Re: Old 97's roll call
« Reply #16 on: July 09, 2004, 02:34:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by MET:
  Never heard of these guys before.  Is it worth going?
This might help you decide:
 
 
Quote
A critical reputation so stellar that even Bruce Springsteen called them one of his favorite bands.

Guiny

  • Guest
Re: Old 97's roll call
« Reply #17 on: July 09, 2004, 03:33:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by MET:
  Never heard of these guys before.  Is it worth going?
Eve6, yes,
 Old 97's, no

Re: Old 97's roll call
« Reply #18 on: July 09, 2004, 03:42:00 pm »
Eve who?
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by Rob_Gee_a.k.a _Guiny:
   
Quote
Originally posted by MET:
  Never heard of these guys before.  Is it worth going?
Eve6, yes,
 Old 97's, no [/b]

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8545
Re: Old 97's roll call
« Reply #19 on: July 12, 2004, 01:48:00 pm »
So was this a good show?

Re: Old 97's roll call
« Reply #20 on: July 12, 2004, 02:00:00 pm »
We saw the second band, a local band called the Speaks. The lead singer sang like he was trying to take a dump during the whole set. They did a new order cover that sounded like stp covering new order, and that's not a good thing. The crowd cheered more that they were finished than for any of their songs. You can sample just how bad they are by going to their website. www.thespeaks.com
 
 Old 97's played a good mix of a total of 16 songs for 62 minutes. No doubt they'll play much longer at the 9:30 in Sept. Two new songs were in the mix. Ken's guitar was turned down way too low, and Murry's mike wasn't loud enough. But I can't really complain, I watched for free outside the gates.
 
 We left after the Old 97's, as did quite a few others. Not sure why Eve 6 was the headliner. I had never even heard of them. Old 97's sold out the 9:30 last time they were here.

chaz

  • Member
  • Posts: 5111
  • este lugar es una mierda
Re: Old 97's roll call
« Reply #21 on: July 12, 2004, 02:06:00 pm »
Rhett-
 Which Old 97's record would you reckon is a good place to start?

Re: Old 97's roll call
« Reply #22 on: July 12, 2004, 02:13:00 pm »
My favorite is their third, Too Far to Care. I think the allmusic review sums it up best (below). The first two are more countryish, the 4th and 5th are more pop-rockish, this one split the gap perfectly.
 
 Serving as the ideal apex between the Old 97's Texas twang and smart pop fascinations, Too Far to Care is instantly catchy and endearing; heartbreaking desert soul and punk-fueled swagger all at the same time. Chief songwriter Rhett Miller turns a phrase like a doorknob and opens doors to dusty barrooms and tattered bedrooms, both containing the same boozy characters in various states of emotional undress. The initial blast of "Timebomb" carries through the first three songs, relenting finally in the breathy croon of "Salome," accented warmly by bassist Murry Hammond's light harmonies and guitarist Ken Bethea's airy tremolo-heavy guitar. Other highlights include the high-speed chase of "Melt Show," the reckless surge of "House That Used to Be," and their confident re-recording of "Big Brown Eyes" (originally appearing on their 1995 album Wreck Your Life). Throughout the album, Miller's swooning howl aches with too many miles on the road and too many lonely nights, familiar topics to be sure but he still manages to tackle them like he invented heartache. The curse of Old 97's may be that country fans consider it too rock & roll, and rock fans can't get past the twang, but for those who dip both feet into these streams, it really doesn't get any better than this band and this album.
 
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by chaz:
  Rhett-
 Which Old 97's record would you reckon is a good place to start?

edbert

  • Member
  • Posts: 586
Re: Old 97's roll call
« Reply #23 on: July 12, 2004, 04:22:00 pm »
Quote
I watched for free outside the gates.
Was it set up the same as last year, with no place to sit except the hot pavement and no hiding from the sun until it completely sets?  I remember paying to get into Everclear last year, just to end up watching from a shaded bench outside the fenced perimiter

Re: Old 97's roll call
« Reply #24 on: July 12, 2004, 04:25:00 pm »
I believe it was. We watched the show from outside, on the right, on the sidewalk adjacent to the National Gallery.
 
 Last year, we watched GBV from outside ,left of the stage. That part was sealed off this year.
 
 I wouldn't have minded paying the 5 bucks to get in, but the sight lines were actually much better outside of the pay area.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by edbert:
   
Quote
I watched for free outside the gates.
Was it set up the same as last year, with no place to sit except the hot pavement and no hiding from the sun until it completely sets?  I remember paying to get into Everclear last year, just to end up watching from a shaded bench outside the fenced perimiter [/b]

Re: Old 97's roll call
« Reply #25 on: July 13, 2004, 08:41:00 am »
Old 97's will be on www.wfuv.org at 9 am thing morning.

eilo97

  • Member
  • Posts: 115
Re: Old 97's roll call
« Reply #26 on: July 13, 2004, 09:58:00 am »
anyone willing to post a setlist?

Re: Old 97's roll call
« Reply #27 on: July 13, 2004, 10:01:00 am »
From another chatboard
 
 Roller
 Barrier
 Lonely
 Smokers
 New Kid
 Designs
 Vict
 Line
 Doreen (great scream!)
 Worst
 King
 W. Tx
 Jag
 Big
 Murder
 Time

Re: Old 97's roll call
« Reply #28 on: July 13, 2004, 10:03:00 am »
pollstar is now listing the 97's for REcher on 9/25 and 9:30 club on 9/26. Opposite of their website.

eilo97

  • Member
  • Posts: 115
Re: Old 97's roll call
« Reply #29 on: July 13, 2004, 10:09:00 am »
thanks for the setlist   :) .  that is strange, about the mix up of dates.  if it's true, it makes things a lot less convenient for those of us who are planning to travel to baltimore for the recher show.