Author Topic: eiffel tower on fire  (Read 4839 times)

poorlulu

  • Guest
Re: eiffel tower on fire
« Reply #15 on: July 22, 2003, 03:10:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by mankie:
   
Quote
Originally posted by poorlulu:
 
Quote

 erm................no
 
 [/b]
That response is understandable coming from a native of the only country that has probably lost more wars (and sporting events for that matter) than France. [/b]
you wanna have a war mankie?
 
 we could have a war........if it makes you happy

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: eiffel tower on fire
« Reply #16 on: July 22, 2003, 03:13:00 pm »
Oh Mankie dont worry about Lulu, she is having a particularly bad time of the month.
 
 I am sure she will return to her non aggressive self in a couple of days.

poorlulu

  • Guest
Re: eiffel tower on fire
« Reply #17 on: July 22, 2003, 03:29:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by markie:
  Oh Mankie dont worry about Lulu, she is having a particularly bad time of the month.
 
 I am sure she will return to her non aggressive self in a couple of days.
and i'll take you on too f@ckface.................
 
 growl.........rowl................rrrrrrrrrrrr...............

paige

  • Guest
Re: eiffel tower on fire
« Reply #18 on: July 22, 2003, 03:34:00 pm »
this gives meaning to the Thursday song "Paris in Flames," doesn't it? hahaha..
 
 
 no.

  • Guest
Re: eiffel tower on fire
« Reply #19 on: July 22, 2003, 04:02:00 pm »
42

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: eiffel tower on fire
« Reply #20 on: July 22, 2003, 04:20:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by The Bombay Doors:
  "Great Britain, now a second-rate power who adopts the bitter moralistic tone of a loser who's been knocked down a few pegs in the pecking order."
 

 
   
Quote
Originally posted by mankie:
  Wouldn't it be sweet if some muslim in a plane crashed into it, then the Frogs want to go to war but we tell them to fuck off?
[/b]
Is that your girlfriend's blog?

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8545
Re: eiffel tower on fire
« Reply #21 on: July 22, 2003, 04:29:00 pm »
Look, Markie's Markie again!  Guess the incognito got stale....
 
 And you know, I forgot who Bob Pollard was initially?  Ah well, what does it matter.  It took me weeks to figure out that Rhett Miller is not the actual Rhett Miller.

Re: eiffel tower on fire
« Reply #22 on: July 22, 2003, 04:31:00 pm »
You mean to say it took you awhile to figure out that chatboard Rhett Miller is not the singer Rhett Miller?
 
 
 Because I've always been the same guy on the board. I never did any of that dual name shit that was going on on the board awhile back.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by bags:
  Look, Markie's Markie again!  Guess the incognito got stale....
 
 And you know, I forgot who Bob Pollard was initially?  Ah well, what does it matter.  It took me weeks to figure out that Rhett Miller is not the actual Rhett Miller.

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: eiffel tower on fire
« Reply #23 on: July 22, 2003, 04:34:00 pm »
I would go back to andrew wk, but once you have used an alias it becomes blocked forever.
 
 markie is a twat.

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8545
Re: eiffel tower on fire
« Reply #24 on: July 22, 2003, 04:35:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Rhett Miller:
  You mean to say it took you awhile to figure out that chatboard Rhett Miller is not the singer Rhett Miller?
 
 
 Because I've always been the same guy on the board. I never did any of that dual name shit that was going on on the board awhile back.
 
   
Quote
Originally posted by bags:
  Look, Markie's Markie again!  Guess the incognito got stale....
 
 And you know, I forgot who Bob Pollard was initially?  Ah well, what does it matter.  It took me weeks to figure out that Rhett Miller is not the actual Rhett Miller.
[/b]
Yup, it took me a while to figure out you weren't the Old 97s singer.  I know, you haven't changed your name.  Bless you.  Though I think I could pick you out pretty quickly if you did!
 
 I'd love to change my name -- bags is an old college nickname that I've used in the past (so it's easy to remember), but too late now.  I didn't know we could change 'em before I started posting pretty regularly.  Doesn't make sense to change now.

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: eiffel tower on fire
« Reply #25 on: July 22, 2003, 04:36:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by markie:
  I would go back to andrew wk, but once you have used an alias it becomes blocked forever.
 
So the scientist is dead?

jadetree

  • Member
  • Posts: 3161
Re: eiffel tower on fire
« Reply #26 on: July 22, 2003, 04:41:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by bags:
  I forgot who Bob Pollard was initially?
Fico

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: eiffel tower on fire
« Reply #27 on: July 22, 2003, 04:43:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggw:
 
 
So the scientist is dead? [/QB][/QUOTE]
 
 I guess so, its was good whilst it lasted.....
 
 Actually it was a shite name.
 
 I think I should be miserable git, or something like that instead. For now I think I will stick with Markie.
 
 I cant believe anyone thought Rhett was the real Rhett. Who has posted under about 20 different names. Bags you have much to learn.

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: eiffel tower on fire
« Reply #28 on: July 22, 2003, 04:45:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by markie:
  I think I should be miserable git, or something like that instead. For now I think I will stick with Markie.
 
six of one, half-dozen the other....

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: eiffel tower on fire
« Reply #29 on: July 22, 2003, 04:47:00 pm »
gee thanks,
 
 why no deviation from the GGW, afraid no one would recognise you?