Author Topic: A sad day for Bags....  (Read 5796 times)

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8540
Re: A sad day for Bags....
« Reply #15 on: February 26, 2004, 02:55:00 pm »
Mank, if you -- an employee of the company - beat the shit out of a customer, both you and the company should be vulnerable to litigation.
 
 If another customer beats the shit out of the annoying customer, no, the company should not be party to a suit.

mankie

  • Guest
Re: A sad day for Bags....
« Reply #16 on: February 26, 2004, 05:51:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Bags:
  Mank, if you -- an employee of the company - beat the shit out of a customer, both you and the company should be vulnerable to litigation.
 
 If another customer beats the shit out of the annoying customer, no, the company should not be party to a suit.
So if I ever want to beat the shit out of a customer I should drag him next door to Carmax first?
 
 And I'm sure there's some dirtbag lawyer who'd find a way to sue us for two customers duking it out on our property...and if any board members are lawyers (except smackie) YES! You're all fucking miserable lousy dirtbags, even lower than car salespeople.

Celeste

  • Guest
Re: A sad day for Bags....
« Reply #17 on: February 26, 2004, 06:15:00 pm »
What about sueing gun shops and manufacturers of guns used in crimes?

  • Guest
Re: A sad day for Bags....
« Reply #18 on: February 26, 2004, 06:17:00 pm »
There'd be no more gun worries, if responsible volk would all send their jugend here.

SPARX

  • Member
  • Posts: 2070
Re: A sad day for Bags....
« Reply #19 on: February 26, 2004, 06:18:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Harriet Balls:
  What about sueing gun shops and manufacturers of guns used in crimes?
Weren't they considering that in Washington state,somehow related to the sniper case?Thought i read that somewhere about a gun shop.

mankie

  • Guest
Re: A sad day for Bags....
« Reply #20 on: February 26, 2004, 06:31:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by SPARX:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Harriet Balls:
  What about sueing gun shops and manufacturers of guns used in crimes?
Weren't they considering that in Washington state,somehow related to the sniper case?Thought i read that somewhere about a gun shop. [/b]
I think they went after the gunshop in Washington state because the gunshop owner did not follow procedures before selling guns, and never kept records.
 
 DC has a law that gun manufactures can be held responsible for crimes committed with their products...which is Bo'o'o'o'ogus. That's like sueing Toyota if some Baw'heed has an accident in one of their cars.

Dr. Anton Phibes

  • Member
  • Posts: 1089
Re: A sad day for Bags....
« Reply #21 on: February 26, 2004, 07:34:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by mankie:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Bags:
  Mank, if you -- an employee of the company - beat the shit out of a customer, both you and the company should be vulnerable to litigation.
 
 If another customer beats the shit out of the annoying customer, no, the company should not be party to a suit.
So if I ever want to beat the shit out of a customer I should drag him next door to Carmax first?
 
 And I'm sure there's some dirtbag lawyer who'd find a way to sue us for two customers duking it out on our property...and if any board members are lawyers (except smackie) YES! You're all fucking miserable lousy dirtbags, even lower than car salespeople. [/b]
Wait a minute!.....Even lower than car salespeople??....I thought they were the sh*t that you scraped off your shoe??.......just wondering......

mankie

  • Guest
Re: A sad day for Bags....
« Reply #22 on: February 27, 2004, 11:50:00 am »
Quote
Originally posted by imrotten:
   
Quote
Originally posted by mankie:
   
Quote
Originally posted by Bags:
  Mank, if you -- an employee of the company - beat the shit out of a customer, both you and the company should be vulnerable to litigation.
 
 If another customer beats the shit out of the annoying customer, no, the company should not be party to a suit.
So if I ever want to beat the shit out of a customer I should drag him next door to Carmax first?
 
 And I'm sure there's some dirtbag lawyer who'd find a way to sue us for two customers duking it out on our property...and if any board members are lawyers (except smackie) YES! You're all fucking miserable lousy dirtbags, even lower than car salespeople. [/b]
Wait a minute!.....Even lower than car salespeople??....I thought they were the sh*t that you scraped off your shoe??.......just wondering...... [/b]
No, no, you are mistaken...we, the carsalesmen, are the stick you use to scrape the shit off the bottom of your shoe...lawyers are actually the shit.

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: A sad day for Bags....
« Reply #23 on: February 27, 2004, 01:08:00 pm »
I dunno I have heard some nightmare stories on the web about car dealers.......
 
 
 "!@#$ is a creep.. he gave me a bad feeling from day one and all I can say is Thank GOD I didn't give him any money and quietly wait for a car to arrive."
 
 
 The names have been removed to protect the guilty.

mankie

  • Guest
Re: A sad day for Bags....
« Reply #24 on: February 27, 2004, 01:14:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by mark e smith:
  I dunno I have heard some nightmare stories on the web about car dealers.......
 
 
 "!@#$ is a creep.. he gave me a bad feeling from day one and all I can say is Thank GOD I didn't give him any money and quietly wait for a car to arrive."
 
 
 The names have been removed to protect the guilty.
Hey! She was asking to be felt-up sitting there in her mini-skirt, no knickers and her tits hanging out...  ;)

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: A sad day for Bags....
« Reply #25 on: February 27, 2004, 01:20:00 pm »
I dunno, someone seemed to annoy a lot of people. Never returning calls and the like. Is that how people manage to devote so much time to the board?

  • Guest
Re: A sad day for Bags....
« Reply #26 on: February 28, 2004, 07:58:00 pm »
This snippet, transcript here, is what got Stern into deep dookie.
 
   <img src="http://www.unclemelon.com/teddy_or_bj.jpg" alt=" - " />