The article you are referring to was David Segal's usual crap in the Post.<BR> I saw Norah for free at the Kennedy Center a month before her big record came out, and later at the 9:30 when it was starting to take off. Age-wise, both audiences were a refreshing mix on 20, 30, 40, and gasp, 50somethings. A good mix of races, and couples of varying sexual orientations. Granted, someone in my party (not me) complained that the audience was full of yuppies, but hey this is DC.<P> I also disagreed with the aforementioned article in that it was claiming that Bruce Springsteen's core audience was younger than Norah Jones. Give me a break! Are there really that many people under the age of 30 who listen to Bruce Springsteen?<P> <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Arial, Veranda">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by BOOMERANG1313:<BR><B>I dunno how I feel about her. She doesn't really seem like she feels her lyrics. I don't enjoy music where artists don't give their whole heart into their singing. I just read that her core audience is mainly people pushin 50. The Grammy's sucked this year, mainly because their music was horrible except for a few acts, and partly because it was pretty much Norah walking up and accepting her awards.</B><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>