Author Topic: ggw's little punk rock brother  (Read 5218 times)

tinygee

  • Member
  • Posts: 189
Re: ggw's little punk rock brother
« Reply #30 on: October 13, 2004, 01:25:00 pm »
man i am that stupid if i cant get the quote deal right, disregard all of my opinion in this thread please.

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: ggw's little punk rock brother
« Reply #31 on: October 13, 2004, 01:25:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by tinygee:
  hahahahaha.......good one, no thats not what i mean, but the whole point is just that democrats seem more open minded thats all. hey im not saying at all i know what im talking about, ive only been paying attention to the presidency the past 4 years so what the fuck should i know.
 
Democrats were protesting Bush before he even took office. Is that your definition of "open-minded"?

Random Citizen

  • Guest
Re: ggw's little punk rock brother
« Reply #32 on: October 13, 2004, 01:26:00 pm »
See this graphic  :)

ratioci nation

  • Member
  • Posts: 4463
Re: ggw's little punk rock brother
« Reply #33 on: October 13, 2004, 01:28:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  Democrats were protesting Bush before he even took office. Is that your definition of "open-minded"?
you may remember his election was a bit different than most

tinygee

  • Member
  • Posts: 189
Re: ggw's little punk rock brother
« Reply #34 on: October 13, 2004, 01:29:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Random Citizen:
  See this graphic   :)  
thanks. yes pollard, exactly what i was going to say, they were protesting because of a ridiculously unfair election.

ratioci nation

  • Member
  • Posts: 4463
Re: ggw's little punk rock brother
« Reply #35 on: October 13, 2004, 01:34:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by tinygee:
  thanks. yes pollard, exactly what i was going to say, they were protesting because of a ridiculously unfair election.
well i left out the commentary, so not quite exactly what I said

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 15279
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: ggw's little punk rock brother
« Reply #36 on: October 13, 2004, 01:50:00 pm »
crap Social Distortion soldout and I have no ticket   :confused:
T.Rex

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: ggw's little punk rock brother
« Reply #37 on: October 13, 2004, 01:58:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by pollard:
   
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  Democrats were protesting Bush before he even took office. Is that your definition of "open-minded"?
you may remember his election was a bit different than most [/b]
A. Protests were not all about the elections.
 B. The assertion was that Democrats accept election results and support the President, whereas Republicans get mad and sulk. Close election or not, the results were the results.

Re: ggw's little punk rock brother
« Reply #38 on: October 13, 2004, 03:08:00 pm »
In a breakfast gathering in Davenport, Iowa, Cheney spoke to about 60 local Republicans. He took four questions from the audience that turned out to be testimonials praising the work of Bush. "Next to Jesus Christ, he probably took the greatest load on his shoulder of any individual," one attendee said.

LRHippo

  • Guest
Re: ggw's little punk rock brother
« Reply #39 on: October 13, 2004, 03:20:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by kosmo vinyl:
  crap Social Distortion soldout and I have no ticket    :confused:  
Wait one second...Social D is playing???? I completly missed that one!

ratioci nation

  • Member
  • Posts: 4463
Re: ggw's little punk rock brother
« Reply #40 on: October 13, 2004, 03:29:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  B. The assertion was that Democrats accept election results and support the President, whereas Republicans get mad and sulk. Close election or not, the results were the results.
unless you thought they were not the results, I don't agree with tinygee but I don't think the fact that people protested counters the assertion
 
 there is a big difference between not liking the incoming president but knowing that he won, and not liking the incoming president and feeling that he was not elected

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 15279
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: ggw's little punk rock brother
« Reply #41 on: October 13, 2004, 03:36:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by LRHippo:
   
Quote
Originally posted by kosmo vinyl:
  crap Social Distortion soldout and I have no ticket     :confused:  
Wait one second...Social D is playing???? I completly missed that one! [/b]
yeah they are playing at nation next monday, i was dragging my feet due to basically having to buy tickets via ticketmaster and the fact that it was at nation...
T.Rex

tinygee

  • Member
  • Posts: 189
Re: ggw's little punk rock brother
« Reply #42 on: October 13, 2004, 03:49:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by pollard:
   
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  B. The assertion was that Democrats accept election results and support the President, whereas Republicans get mad and sulk. Close election or not, the results were the results.
unless you thought they were not the results, I don't agree with tinygee but I don't think the fact that people protested counters the assertion
 
 there is a big difference between not liking the incoming president but knowing that he won, and not liking the incoming president and feeling that he was not elected [/b]
so you agree with me pollard if he did think in fact those were the results? you're double negatives are confusing.

ratioci nation

  • Member
  • Posts: 4463
Re: ggw's little punk rock brother
« Reply #43 on: October 13, 2004, 03:53:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by tinygee:
  so you agree with me pollard if he did think in fact those were the results? you're double negatives are confusing.
there are not no double negative in what I said

Random Citizen

  • Guest
Re: ggw's little punk rock brother
« Reply #44 on: October 13, 2004, 04:59:00 pm »
That guy is on the front page of the Post's website now. Slow news day, I 'spose.