Author Topic: Velvet Lounge set times?  (Read 14308 times)

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: Velvet Lounge set times?
« Reply #45 on: July 29, 2003, 03:22:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  Alright, so it'll be a Pollard-Jaguar-Thirsty tagteam match against The Mad Scientist.
 
 Sweet....
argghhghg, I'll take them all on, grrrrrrrrrrr
 
 whose corner are you going to be in GGW?

Jaguär

  • Guest
Re: Velvet Lounge set times?
« Reply #46 on: July 29, 2003, 03:24:00 pm »
Jesus Markie, get over it!   :roll:  
 
 If everyone reacted like you are now to some very innocent playing around with pictures posted here than you would have no friends on this board. Period! Many a time you have posted pictures that were much, much worse of others and alluded or even directly claimed that they were that person, thing or animal. Again, you can dish it out but you can't take it. I saw a picture that reminded me of the recent party and selected 3 people that it could remind me of. Thirsty looked a little like Thurston but the person, in his case, did have something to do with it. The other 2 were only 2 other people at the party, within our group whom I selected based only on the very slightest resemblances, and only visual ones. Even then, I selected based on my closer connections. The women themselves had absofuckinglutely nothing whatsoever to do with the selections.
 
 Markie, go home and get laid or beat off or something. You are too tense this week.

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Velvet Lounge set times?
« Reply #47 on: July 29, 2003, 03:26:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by markie:
   
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  Alright, so it'll be a Pollard-Jaguar-Thirsty tagteam match against The Mad Scientist.
 
 Sweet....
argghhghg, I'll take them all on, grrrrrrrrrrr
 
 whose corner are you going to be in GGW? [/b]
I'll be handling the promotion $$

Jaguär

  • Guest
Re: Velvet Lounge set times?
« Reply #48 on: July 29, 2003, 03:27:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  Alright, so it'll be a Pollard-Jaguar-Thirsty tagteam match against The Mad Scientist.
 
 Sweet....
I trust that you will promote this bash and maximize the profits.   ;)  
 
 Oh, and I think that Kosmo wants in on this fiasco.

thirsty moore

  • Member
  • Posts: 6131
Re: Velvet Lounge set times?
« Reply #49 on: July 29, 2003, 03:27:00 pm »
She did allude to three people on the board being the three people in the photograph.  One of them being Thurston Moore, and the other two being Monica Lewinsky and Kim Gordon.
 
 The only thing in common that any of us three have with that picture is that I use Thurston Moore's name on the board.  Jaguar never said that any of us looked like anyone in the picture.  It was name association only.

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: Velvet Lounge set times?
« Reply #50 on: July 29, 2003, 03:28:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Jaguär:
  Jesus Markie, get over it!    :roll:  
 
  The other 2 were only 2 other people at the party, within our group whom I selected based only on the very slightest resemblances, and only visual ones. Even then, I selected based on my closer connections. The women themselves had absofuckinglutely nothing whatsoever to do with the selections.
 
 
No I am fine, really. Oh, and your quote sounds like contradiction.

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 15213
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: Velvet Lounge set times?
« Reply #51 on: July 29, 2003, 03:29:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Jaguär:
   
Quote
Originally posted by ggw™:
  Alright, so it'll be a Pollard-Jaguar-Thirsty tagteam match against The Mad Scientist.
 
 Sweet....
I trust that you will promote this bash and maximize the profits.    ;)  
 
 Oh, and I think that Kosmo wants in on this fiasco. [/b]
only if i can dj... or say "LETS GET READY TO RUMBLE" the mic that drops down from the rafters is way deck....
T.Rex

thirsty moore

  • Member
  • Posts: 6131
Re: Velvet Lounge set times?
« Reply #52 on: July 29, 2003, 03:30:00 pm »
So constantly bringing up something equals fine?  I'd hate to hear you gripe about an injury.

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: Velvet Lounge set times?
« Reply #53 on: July 29, 2003, 03:31:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by thirsty moore:
  She did allude to THREE people on the board being the three people in the photograph.  
 
 It was name association only.
Only one person was name association.

Jaguär

  • Guest
Re: Velvet Lounge set times?
« Reply #54 on: July 29, 2003, 03:35:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by markie:
 
Oh, and your quote sounds like contradiction. [/b]
 
 In your mind only.   :roll:

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: Velvet Lounge set times?
« Reply #55 on: July 29, 2003, 03:35:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by thirsty moore:
  So constantly bringing up something equals fine?  I'd hate to hear you gripe about an injury.
yes really, I am fine. I brought it up because Jag implied that Lulu and her were going to gang up against me.
 
 I wouldnt have bothered if I knew it would all start again.
 
 I had hoped that someone would have apologised for making that association. Am I not allowed to defend Lulu?  Who took the comments the same way I did, as did another person from here.
 
 But as Fico says, its just arguing on the internet

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: Velvet Lounge set times?
« Reply #56 on: July 29, 2003, 03:38:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by Jaguär:
   
Quote
Originally posted by markie:
 
Oh, and your quote sounds like contradiction. [/b]
 
 In your mind only.    :roll:  [/b]
really,
 
 you say to paraphrase:
 
  slight visual resemblences,
 
 then the women chosen had nothing to do with it whatsoever.
 
 Which? That is contradiction.
 
 I am doing this now out of arguemnets sake.

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: Velvet Lounge set times?
« Reply #57 on: July 29, 2003, 03:40:00 pm »
Watch out.  It looks like Markie's been practicing:
 
 http://rope.92kqrs.com/waxy/Star_Wars_Kid.wmv

Jaguär

  • Guest
Re: Velvet Lounge set times?
« Reply #58 on: July 29, 2003, 03:49:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by markie:
 
Quote
Originally posted by thirsty moore:
  So constantly bringing up something equals fine?  I'd hate to hear you gripe about an injury.
yes really, I am fine. I brought it up because Jag implied that Lulu and her were going to gang up against me. [/b]
 
 Read what I wrote!:
 "Possibly, but there is one little thing missing. Poorlulu. All along it's been Markie trying to get his woman to to do his fighting for him. Hell, Poorlulu and I will just get together and have fun and let Markie stew it out with Pollard or whomever else he feels like picking on at the moment."
 
 Where in there do you get the idea that Lulu and I would "gang up against(you)"?
 
 My implication is that we wouldn't even bother.   :roll:  
 
 I wouldnt have bothered if I knew it would all start again.
 
 Somehow I doubt that. I'm sure that you've been dying to start it all over again.
 
 I had hoped that someone would have apologised for making that association. Am I not allowed to defend Lulu?  Who took the comments the same way I did, as did another person from here.
 
 I'm sorry that you are upset but I don't think that I did anything wrong. Nothing but the same games we play on here everyday. It was you who read much, much more into that post than was ever intended and I have no doubt that just about everyone else knew how little it meant. It was 3 people enjoying a party, and that's about all it was.

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: Velvet Lounge set times?
« Reply #59 on: July 29, 2003, 03:50:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  Watch out.  It looks like Markie's been practicing:
 
  http://rope.92kqrs.com/waxy/Star_Wars_Kid.wmv
[/qb][/QUOTE]I'll be handling the promotion $$ [/QB][/QUOTE]
 
 The earning potential from this venture must be almost unlimitless.