Originally posted by SPARX:
Originally posted by ggw™:
[/b]
I was in Tower over the weekend and the import of the new Dandy Warhol's album was $38.99. I thought it had to be a misprint, so I checked, and it wasn't a misprint. $38.99. unbelievable. Especially considering the US version was coming out two days later. [/b]
I'd love to meet the ones who paid that for the new one and thought it was worth it,well maybe not.It has some good songs but overall the weakest yet IMHO.I hear they are playing nearly 3 hour sets,not relying heavily on the new one.Looking forward to this show
[/QB]
The new Dandys isn't particularly good, but I got a free promo copy to review so I ain't complainin.
I think the Guardian is probably more right, which is funny cause it's the Brits who still actually buy singles. The fact that the article cited the sales of the American Idol singles with the death of the album is one of the funniest thing I've read in a long time. CLAY AND RUBIN DONT HAVE ALBUMS OUT. Of course people are gonna buy the singles if they want to hear them. I'm not really worried. The album is only as viable as acts make it. It's still the best way to package the music.
I think even 5 or 10 years from now, artists will still post "suggested tracklists" even if the album is only obtained online. Some bands write songs that work well together, others don't. Staind et al can just put songs on the internet whenever they feel like it, and Flaming Lips can still wait 3 years and come out with a full albums worth of songs.