930 Forums

=> GENERAL DISCUSSION => Topic started by: RatBastard on February 08, 2013, 09:27:16 pm

Title: He's at it again
Post by: RatBastard on February 08, 2013, 09:27:16 pm
Bammy is once again playing the fear card in an attempt to trounce on the constitution...


http://news.yahoo.com/state-union-feature-gun-violence-victims-001321625--abc-news-politics.html

What he ought to do is pass a law that make firearm training mandatory in order to get a high school diploma.  If any of these 'victims' had been armed and properly trained they would not have been victims.  I'm not saying what happened is their fault but I am saying if they had made that choice they would not be in the spot they are in now.  Then again the libtards would not have their dog and pony show to troy t out either.
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: i am gay and i like cats on February 08, 2013, 09:38:55 pm
you better like van halen . . . that's all i'm saying.
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: RatBastard on February 09, 2013, 12:11:46 am
you better like van halen . . . that's all i'm saying.


The band yes (not the VanHagar version that was too pop), the guitar player not so much.
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: chaz on February 11, 2013, 05:38:33 pm
'victims'

wtf
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: hutch on February 11, 2013, 05:41:23 pm
'victims'

wtf


seriously. when is this troll going to get banned.
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: atomicfront on February 11, 2013, 05:53:06 pm
'victims'

wtf


seriously. when is this troll going to get banned.

Banning people for having differing political views than yourself?
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: sweetcell on February 11, 2013, 05:59:38 pm
playing the fear card in an attempt to trounce on the constitution...

wait, are we back to bashing george w bush?  that shit is ooooooooold...
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: hutch on February 11, 2013, 06:48:09 pm
guess the children weren't victims hence 'victims'


disgusting. you need to get banned asshole. and pronto.
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: RatBastard on February 11, 2013, 06:51:32 pm
guess the children weren't victims hence 'victims'


disgusting. you need to get banned asshole. and pronto.

Thanks for the compliment!
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: i am gay and i like cats on February 11, 2013, 08:26:33 pm
this whole hutch vs ratbastard thing we got going on here, is awesome.
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: Justin Tonation on February 11, 2013, 09:13:34 pm
Arm the first-graders! What possibly could go wrong?
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: RatBastard on February 11, 2013, 09:56:22 pm
this whole hutch vs ratbastard thing we got going on here, is awesome.

You pull the stings and the puppet dances...
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: hutch on February 11, 2013, 10:48:43 pm
  I'm not saying what happened is their fault but I am saying if they had made that choice they would not be in the spot they are in now. 

so the kids made the wrong choice? it is not their fault they got mowed down by a psychopath but it was their mistake not to be armed and trained? is this what you're saying? it seems to be what you're saying but its so beyond ridiculous, so stupid, and so heinously callous that I have trouble even beginning to comprehend it.

tell me you simply don't know how to write.. tell me there was more to your thinking..throw me a bone brother! because otherwise i'd be forced to conclude you're the biggest sack of shit this side of the Mississippi..
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: RatBastard on February 11, 2013, 10:57:13 pm
  I'm not saying what happened is their fault but I am saying if they had made that choice they would not be in the spot they are in now. 

so the kids made the wrong choice? it is not their fault they got mowed down by a psychopath but it was their mistake not to be armed and trained? is this what you're saying? it seems to be what you're saying but its so beyond ridiculous, so stupid, and so heinously callous that I have trouble even beginning to comprehend it.

tell me you simply don't know how to write.. tell me there was more to your thinking..throw me a bone brother! because otherwise i'd be forced to conclude you're the biggest sack of shit this side of the Mississippi..

Perhaps you ought to go read the entire article before you post of of ignorance as to what it says and who the victims are who will be attending as the dog and pony show.  Also you ought to read and fully comprehend what I posted rather than rd it with bias and blindness.  Lastly, an observation, I hear the circus music playing as you puppet dance with every post you make.
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: hutch on February 11, 2013, 11:08:23 pm
  I'm not saying what happened is their fault but I am saying if they had made that choice they would not be in the spot they are in now. 

so the kids made the wrong choice? it is not their fault they got mowed down by a psychopath but it was their mistake not to be armed and trained? is this what you're saying? it seems to be what you're saying but its so beyond ridiculous, so stupid, and so heinously callous that I have trouble even beginning to comprehend it.

tell me you simply don't know how to write.. tell me there was more to your thinking..throw me a bone brother! because otherwise i'd be forced to conclude you're the biggest sack of shit this side of the Mississippi..

Perhaps you ought to go read the entire article before you post of of ignorance as to what it says and who the victims are who will be attending as the dog and pony show.  Also you ought to read and fully comprehend what I posted rather than rd it with bias and blindness.  Lastly, an observation, I hear the circus music playing as you puppet dance with every post you make.


exactly.

blah blah blah

you got nothing.

Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: kosmo vinyl on February 11, 2013, 11:13:17 pm
Can we please call a truce on the political arguments here? Buy each other virtual drinks and kick back with some favorite tunes. 
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: RatBastard on February 11, 2013, 11:18:13 pm
EDITED - Sorry Kos, looks like I was posting the original reply here while you were posting the truce offering above.  I have removed all of my post and I promise to do my best not to pull the puppet strings any more.
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: hutch on February 11, 2013, 11:21:43 pm
^There is your answer Kosmo.


I'm not arguing politics.. I just point out how incredibly horrible it is to say the young children died because they made the wrong choice.

Is that wrong of me, Kosmo, to point that out? Should I just let RatBastard keep trolling, politicizing tragedy, writing about dead young children in order to make his "points"?
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: RatBastard on February 12, 2013, 05:45:55 am
^There is your answer Kosmo.


I'm not arguing politics.. I just point out how incredibly horrible it is to say the young children died because they made the wrong choice.

Is that wrong of me, Kosmo, to point that out? Should I just let RatBastard keep trolling, politicizing tragedy, writing about dead young children in order to make his "points"?


Just an FYI, I did not say that.  All I am going to say to you about this at all.  If you want to have a discussion where you reply to what I actually say then fine we can do that.  If you want to sensationalize and run on with ad hominem irrelevant opinions well I'm done with it.  Your choice.  I am done with this thread.
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: i am gay and i like cats on February 12, 2013, 08:38:59 am
  I'm not saying what happened is their fault but I am saying if they had made that choice they would not be in the spot they are in now. 

so the kids made the wrong choice? it is not their fault they got mowed down by a psychopath but it was their mistake not to be armed and trained? is this what you're saying? it seems to be what you're saying but its so beyond ridiculous, so stupid, and so heinously callous that I have trouble even beginning to comprehend it.

tell me you simply don't know how to write.. tell me there was more to your thinking..throw me a bone brother! because otherwise i'd be forced to conclude you're the biggest sack of shit this side of the Mississippi..

Perhaps you ought to go read the entire article before you post of of ignorance as to what it says and who the victims are who will be attending as the dog and pony show.  Also you ought to read and fully comprehend what I posted rather than rd it with bias and blindness.  Lastly, an observation, I hear the circus music playing as you puppet dance with every post you make.


exactly.

blah blah blah

you got nothing.



i got something, fuckhead.  the original article was about kathy giffords . . . not the school shooting, fuckhead.  trying reading the original post and article.  you are the one who just assumed the he was talking about the victims as the school children.  i think he was referring the people at the giffords shooting, fuckhead.  so here's something, fuckhead . . . stop being a troll accusing everybody else of being a troll, fuckhead.
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: kosmo vinyl on February 12, 2013, 08:47:47 am
so much for the peace talks...
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: imbecile on February 12, 2013, 09:18:03 am
Wow, this thread devolved quite fast.  I read the article and then ensuing 'discussion.'  I'm still confused though.

Was this the point - In RatBastard-world it would be required, in order to not make yourself a 'victim' anytime you go to an elementary school or college (as a student or faculty), to a movie, or to a meet-and-greet with someone that you are required to carry a gun and that if you do not carry a gun and you are killed or maimed by someone with a gun then it's your own fault?

Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: hutch on February 12, 2013, 09:46:09 am
wow. nice walkie. nice.

the original article has a bunch of victims listed.. different people shot in different incidents.. what is ratbastard's point? its their fault? They made a mistake?

the original article is a matter of fact stating about who is attending...there is nothing to take issue with there. it doesn't say the president is using the fear card, trouncing the constitution, or that people should be armed to prevent being killed... or that people should have to know how to use guns to graduate high school.
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: atomicfront on February 12, 2013, 10:41:35 am
Hutch and Ratbastard should be banned from talking about politics.  They get too upset about it and become irrational. 
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: Jaguar on February 12, 2013, 10:56:46 am
We need more popcorn.

(https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSZSk0W-kUn9hK9qx-cRuggM-HUlz8rUfhp5v6O01ouOd9NL8XakA)
Title: Re: He's at it again
Post by: chaz on February 12, 2013, 11:10:50 am
In this article we have:

Multiple victims of shootings/mass shootings
1 person who is paralyzed in an accidental discharge of a policeman?s weapon
Multiple family members of shooting/mass shooting victims

Forget politics.  Referring to any of these people as 'victims' is among the most fuckheaded things I've read on this board.  Ratbastard fully lives up to his name in suggesting that these people are anything less than what they are - innocent victims of random acts of violence.  He can fuck off for that. 

ps - I'm not for banning anyone from this board.