Originally posted by HoyaSaxa03:
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
And all of this proves their commonality with punk in which way....?
yeah, my initial question was why the Crue were covering "Anarchy in the UK" when ....
i just always had the impression that early (76-77) punk bands like the sex pistols were out to kill glam rock and bombastic metal like queen and zep and had serious beef with big rock stars ... i guess the crue didn't come around until a bit later though ...
I'm not trying to call anyone out here, I'm just honestly curious as to why they'd cover that song when it seems like they're from completely different worlds and the Sex Pistols would hate Crue ... is there something i'm not seeing here? [/b]
ok, i have two things for that.
A) really, dont ever compare Motley Crue to Led Zeppelin.
B) by the time Motley Crue covered that song, heck, by the time Motley Crue FORMED , the Sex Pistols had already made thier one and only decent musical effort, and had been laid to rest, only to be worshipped for generations of fans who werent even alive when "Nevermind the Bullocks" was released, thinking they were one of the all-time great bands ever.
Why did Motley Crue cover Brownsville Station's "Smokin In The Boys Room"? Why did they cover "Helter Skelter"? i am sure the Beatles dont like em!
but in reality, Motley Crue made many many more records than the Sex Pistols, partied just as hard, and just because they didnt die or something doesnt make them not worthy to sing a crappier bands songs (which they are feeding thier families on the royalties now)
and dont pretend that if the Sex Pistols would've stayed around that they wouldn't have been on MTV cause you know they would've....
now you can all flame me (except Rob i suppose)