Author Topic: A rolling compendium of integers Commentary - 2016 Edition  (Read 60288 times)

grateful

  • Member
  • Posts: 10291
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?
Re: A rolling compendium of integers Commentary - 2016 Edition
« Reply #180 on: July 30, 2020, 10:43:49 am »
Lady and Gentlemen:

Hutch is currently sitting at 19,999 comments!  We anxiously await #20,000.

hutch

  • Guest
Re: A rolling compendium of integers Commentary - 2016 Edition
« Reply #181 on: July 30, 2020, 10:54:45 am »
Sorry to disappoint


I always mess up the big moments

grateful

  • Member
  • Posts: 10291
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?
Re: A rolling compendium of integers Commentary - 2016 Edition
« Reply #182 on: July 30, 2020, 11:02:02 am »
And here's the winning comment:

I wonder why he attended Tulsa Trump rally without mask given on June 11 Cain posted on his own website to wear a mask and take it seriously!?!? Probably peer pressure....May have cost him his life

They say he travelled a lot prior to catching it but he may have been wearing a mask if he heeded his own advice... I think that’s likely

grateful

  • Member
  • Posts: 10291
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?

Re: A rolling compendium of integers Commentary - 2016 Edition
« Reply #184 on: October 23, 2023, 05:52:32 pm »
Numbers 1-100 ranked, worst to best

https://twitter.com/greg16676935420/status/1715847710547321128?t=cDAVd1r65AaP0t7WgKQ__w&s=19
hmm, don't know if 39 is my least favorite, but it's a contender

funny that people are bookmarking it, ya know, for reference on this contentious topic
slack

grateful

  • Member
  • Posts: 10291
  • 👤 👩 👦 📷 📺
    • Wait, the entire rest of the internet exists and you CHOOSE to post here? Who hurt you?
Re: A rolling compendium of integers Commentary - 2016 Edition
« Reply #185 on: October 23, 2023, 06:52:45 pm »
I think their choices from #10 to #2 are solid, but I'm not even sure #1 belongs in the top 25!

#hottake

Re: A rolling compendium of integers Commentary - 2016 Edition
« Reply #186 on: October 23, 2023, 07:05:08 pm »
also, I'm not buying 8 would be ranked 97
there is no way any single digit makes it past the top 50
slack

hutch

  • Member
  • Posts: 3533
Re: A rolling compendium of integers Commentary - 2016 Edition
« Reply #187 on: October 23, 2023, 10:35:49 pm »
18 might be my favorite…it really has a lot going for it

sweetcell

  • Member
  • Posts: 21782
  • I don't belong here.
Re: A rolling compendium of integers Commentary - 2016 Edition
« Reply #188 on: October 23, 2023, 11:20:18 pm »
18 might be my favorite…it really has a lot going for it

Hutch's fav category is "barely legal"... Got it...
<sig>

hutch

  • Member
  • Posts: 3533
Re: A rolling compendium of integers Commentary - 2016 Edition
« Reply #189 on: October 23, 2023, 11:25:37 pm »
Lucky number for Jews and I was born on an 18th and so was my better half.
« Last Edit: October 24, 2023, 12:21:22 am by Hutch »

Re: A rolling compendium of integers Commentary - 2016 Edition
« Reply #190 on: October 24, 2023, 07:44:02 am »
18 might be my favorite…it really has a lot going for it
welp it ranked 69, so there is that
slack

nkotb

  • Member
  • Posts: 6173
Re: A rolling compendium of integers Commentary - 2016 Edition
« Reply #191 on: October 24, 2023, 08:40:08 am »
The future is female

Hutch's fav category is "barely legal"... Got it...