Originally posted by Charlie Nakatestes,Japanese Golfer:
I was looking at it from the point that he's disrespecting women in general (half his constituency) by paying for sex with a woman. I was simply looking at it from the perspective that he's a public figure, not from the persepctive that he's a husband.
In terms of disrespecting his wife, sure, an adulterous affair of an ongoing nature is worse than a one time anonymous thing (discounting the STD factore, which you can't).
ah, makes sense. agreed.
Originally posted by Brian Wallace:
...for only the millionth time. Actually, that should be your motto: "I'm speaking for a group that i'm not a member of."
Brian
request denied: too little basis in the truth. 99% of the time, i speak for a group that i do belong to: "me". yes, we are legion.
not being a member of group doesn't mean one can't have an opinion about it.
and this, from the person who claims to speak "for the younger generation". sheesh. wait... aren't you, like, not young yourself?