Author Topic: The Problem of Aging Rock Critics  (Read 5252 times)

thirsty moore

  • Member
  • Posts: 6131
Re: The Problem of Aging Rock Critics
« Reply #30 on: April 13, 2004, 03:57:00 pm »
It was a good argument up until the mudslinging.

Celeste

  • Guest
Re: The Problem of Aging Rock Critics
« Reply #31 on: April 13, 2004, 03:59:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggwâ?¢:
  I think the roll-eyes indicate Tammy's surprise that you hadn't figured out that I was referring to her man.
KLF is gonna rock ya

Bags

  • Member
  • Posts: 8545
Re: The Problem of Aging Rock Critics
« Reply #32 on: April 13, 2004, 04:00:00 pm »
I would think, rhett, that you'd slam someone for using a term like countrypolitan.
 
 "Countrypolitan" -
 245 gorgeous homes combining the warmth of the country with the amenities of today's most innovative designs.

thirsty moore

  • Member
  • Posts: 6131
Re: The Problem of Aging Rock Critics
« Reply #33 on: April 13, 2004, 04:02:00 pm »
Nice.
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by Ball Girl:
 KLF is gonna rock ya

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: The Problem of Aging Rock Critics
« Reply #34 on: April 13, 2004, 04:11:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by The Grimaceballs:
 [QB] I would have approached it as saying they are derived more from the countrypolitan sounds of Nashville circa 1970 than being associated with the current sound of mainstream Nashville.
 
    By only referencing the stereotype of modern country (of which Dolly Parton is NOT a part of, by the way), you ignore such current non-mainstream outlaws as Steve Earle, EmmyLou Harris, BR549, Lucinda Williams, etc. to which Lambchop may be aligned with, if not in sound, at least in spirit.
 
   
I was dreading writing the review and put it off many times. I really do have strong personal negative connotations with Nashville. But I dont know enough about it, but then I am not really interested in it.
 
 I have read a lot of other lambchop reviews and they have always had trouble aligning their sound to other bands. Right I am off to countrypolitan.com for some post event research, thanks.

markie

  • Member
  • Posts: 13178
Re: The Problem of Aging Rock Critics
« Reply #35 on: April 13, 2004, 04:16:00 pm »
<img src="http://members.ij.net/captbob2112/troll.jpg" alt=" - " />
 
 
 by trolling a troll, does not that make GGW a troll, too?
 
 Battle ye not with monsters, lest ye become a monster.

kosmo vinyl

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • Posts: 14975
    • Hi-Fi Pop
Re: The Problem of Aging Rock Critics
« Reply #36 on: April 13, 2004, 05:13:00 pm »
well the shazam hail from nashville and they certainly aren't part of the contemporary country scene... nashville has a well respected power pop scene
T.Rex

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: The Problem of Aging Rock Critics
« Reply #37 on: April 13, 2004, 06:03:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by mark e smith:
 by trolling a troll, does not that make GGW a troll, too?
No.  I'm not looking to stir up all the other posters, just the opposite.

  • Guest
Re: The Problem of Aging Rock Critics
« Reply #38 on: April 13, 2004, 06:39:00 pm »
Kurt Loder...do you think he was much of a load in his youth?

Celeste

  • Guest
Re: The Problem of Aging Rock Critics
« Reply #39 on: April 13, 2004, 09:51:00 pm »
Quote
Originally posted by ggw™:
  No.  I'm not looking to stir up all the other posters, just the opposite.
so your goal is to bore everybody, then?

ggw

  • Member
  • Posts: 14237
Re: The Problem of Aging Rock Critics
« Reply #40 on: April 13, 2004, 10:26:00 pm »
When you two are in bed, does he tell you your hair is stringy and your tits are too small, just so it won't be boring?
 
 
Quote
Originally posted by Ball Girl:
   
Quote
Originally posted by ggw™:
  No.  I'm not looking to stir up all the other posters, just the opposite.
so your goal is to bore everybody, then? [/b]

Celeste

  • Guest
Re: The Problem of Aging Rock Critics
« Reply #41 on: April 13, 2004, 10:38:00 pm »
Upon first read, I'd though maybe flawd hijacked your user name, but his comments are usually more clever...
 
 Still, I expect better comments from you.
 
 Any thinking person would know that stimulating a lively conversation by stating a differing opinion on subjects of entertainment is different from dissing someone while you're having sex with them. That's not even a good analogy for humourous purposes.
 
 Do you really want the board to be one big, bland lovefest? Where's the growth in that? Hell, where's the *enterainment* in that?